USA – -(Ammoland.com)- According to author Lenden Eakin : “The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly found that the Second Amendment protects civilian ownership of firearms for Militia purposes, but has not defined those purposes. Federal Courts of Appeal have upheld “Assault Weapons” bans without respecting Militia purposes as recently as last week (4th Circuit).
The President, as Commander in Chief of the Militia under the Constitution, has full authority to designate the arms for people to bear in order to achieve Militia purposes.”
Mr. Eakin has practiced law for over thirty years, has experience as a Militia officer (National Guard and State Defense Force) and wrote the book Showdown: The Looming Crisis Over Gun Control (Mascot Books).
He also says: “An Executive Order like this could have a significant impact on the litigation to challenge Assault Weapons Bans currently making its way through the Courts. It would help the challengers.”
What follows is and example of the proposed Executive Order:
By the authority vested in me as President and Commander in Chief of the Militia by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to ensure the ability of citizens of the United States to defend themselves, their communities and their States, as well as to ensure the safety and security of our Nation, I hereby order as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. Both individual and community safety are critically important to the national security of the United States. Terrorism, transnational criminal activity and potential acts of war by foreign nations present a significant threat to national security and our citizens, who have the right and the duty to defend themselves, their communities, their States and the Nation.
Section 2. Policy. It is the policy of the executive branch to:
(a) Support and defend the Constitution, including the Second Amendment right of citizens to keep and bear arms for Militia purposes, as well as self-defense.
(b) Encourage citizens to be prepared to act as members of the Militia to defend communities, States and the Nation, as part of the common defense contemplated by the Constitution of the United States.
(c) Discourage restrictions by States and political subdivisions on individual possession of firearms suitable for Militia purposes by citizens of the United States.Section 3. Definitions.
(a) “Militia” has the meaning given the term in Title 10, Section 311 of the United States Code to include the Unorganized Militia, as well as the meaning given to the term “Militia” under equivalent State statutes.
(b) “Self-Defense” shall mean the actions of citizens to defend themselves and their families from physical attack.
(c) “Communities” shall mean neighborhoods, towns, cities, counties and other political subdivisions of citizens who live in distinct geographic areas within a State.
(d) “State” shall mean one of the fifty States of the United States.
(e) “Militia Purposes” shall mean training, practice and preparedness which could improve the ability of a citizen to act, and to be armed in case of a need to act, as a current or future member of a local, State or National organization commanded by government officials and responsive to a physical threat. Appropriate organizations include those commanded by an elected county or city Sheriff; those commanded by the Governor of a State through officers of that State’s Defense Force as authorized by Title 30, Section 109 of the United States Code, or through officers of that State’s National Guard; and organizations commanded by the President through officers of the Active or Reserve components of U.S. Armed Forces.
(f) “Militia Rifles” shall mean the firearms designated in Section 4 that are made in America and suitable for use in self-defense, community defense, defense of States and defense of the Nation.Section 4. Designation of Militia Rifles. That the following firearms and accessories are authorized and appropriate for individual citizens to keep and bear for Militia purposes under the Constitution and the laws of the United States:
(a) The AR-15 and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs, magazines of up to thirty round capacities, M-7 bayonets, and ammunition in 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington, in all quantities.
(b) The M1A and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs, magazines of up to twenty round capacities, M-6 bayonets, and ammunition in 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester, in all quantities.
(c) The M1 Garand and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs, M-5 bayonets, and ammunition in .30-’06 Springfield, in all quantities.
(d) Bolt action rifles in the calibers of .30-’06 Springfield; 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester; 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington; or any substantially equivalent caliber, and ammunition appropriate for the rifles, in any quantity.
(This list could easily be expanded or replaced by a broad definition.)Section 5. Pre-emption. This Executive Order is intended to pre-empt the laws of States or political subdivisions that infringe upon the rights of citizens to keep and bear the arms designated in Section 4.
Section 6. Judicial Notice. That the judges of all State and Federal Courts are hereby given notice that possession of the designated Militia Rifles and accessories by citizens should not be restricted or infringed upon by State laws or the laws of a political subdivision of a State and any such law should be reviewed under the strict scrutiny standard to determine whether it is a violation of the Constitution of the United States after judicial consideration of this Order and the fact that it was issued by the Commander in Chief of the Militia.
Donald J. Trump
THE WHITE HOUSE
March __, 2017
Read more: http://www.ammoland.com/2017/02/proposed-executive-order-designates-militia-rifles-citizen-ownership/#ixzz4ZwQhXZDy
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
Man, those bar attorneys are either thick-headed or paid by the word for undermining our rights. They think they need to write a book on this:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
As I’m sure #1 knows, that EO is pure garbage. I posted the following reply on that site; let’s see if it makes it through moderation:
***
This proposed executive order is firmly rooted in the statist, authoritarian mentality. It misses the whole point of the Second Amendment, which is to ensure that citizens have the means to defend themselves against police officers, soldiers, and/or other government mercenaries who are attempting to rob citizens of their rights.
Anyone who doesn’t believe the above, doesn’t believe in the Second Amendment. There is no ambiguity. Read the writings of the Founders and understand their historical motivations for writing the Bill of Rights. They were keenly suspicious of excessive government power and didn’t even want a standing army to begin with. (So much for that, eh?)
No government, even an elected one, has an automatic “right to rule.” When a government refuses to recognize basic human rights and insists on forcibly violating those rights, We The People have the right to alter or abolish it. All political power is ultimately based in the physical power of weaponry. The Second Amendment serves as a reminder that such power was intended to remain in the hands of the governed.
Modern US citizens don’t need rifles to protect the country against foreign invasion. We have a huge Navy and Air Force and a massive nuclear deterrent — what country is going to launch a full-blown military attack against that? The US won’t even attack North Korea due to its handful of nukes. As for terrorism, that’s a manufactured crisis intended to get you to surrender your rights. Sadly, the “War on Terror” propaganda has worked extremely well to that end.
We should get rid of the standing army (all or nearly all ground forces, and all law enforcement except elected sheriffs), and maintain only the Navy and Air Force as well as the armed citizenry. That wouldn’t merely “make America great again”; it would make America AMERICA again.
On a final note: Donald Trump may be relatively friendly to guns, but he is an enemy of the Bill of Rights. He supports warrantless mass spying, the persecution of whistleblowers, unaccountable law enforcement, and numerous other violations of the same Constitution that he swore to uphold. And no, that doesn’t mean Hillary would have been any better.
***
WELL SAID BMF…………
Thanks, Koyote. It looks they published my comments after all, as well as a good one by Cal (another guy who posts here) and some others by people who appear to be on the same page.
Well done.
EVEN IF TRUMP COULD BE HEAD OF THE “MILITIA”, IN THIS CASE IT WOULD BE AN IMPOSSIBILITY, SINCE THAT ASSHOLE IS AN ILLEGAL PRESIDENT ANYWAY……………….