A few days when reporting that the Russian Pacific fleet had crossed the Suez canal for the first time in decades in order to form a Mediterranean task force parked in Cyprus for obvious symbolic reasons (in close proximity to Syria and the Israel-parked Kearsarge), some observed that while the submarine support was adequate, the actual warship fleet designated to support any potential escalation in Syria would be largely insufficient.
Perhaps the Russian Navy heard these complaints, and several hours ago RIA reported that two extra warships from the Russian Black Sea fleet had joined the Mediterranean task force, citing Capt. First Rank Vyacheslav Trukhachyov, has said. None of these recent deployment should come as a surprise: in March Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said a permanent naval task force in the Mediterranean was needed to defend Russia’s interests in the region. Read Syria, Cyrpus (where the task force will be on anchor indefinitely), and, of course, any and all western offensive involving Iran. And slowly but surely said task force is nearing completion.
“During a planned rotation, large landing ships Nikolai Filchenkov and Azov from Russia’s Black Sea Fleet have started performing their tasks in the Mediterranean,” Trukhachyov said.
The two ships in question:
the Azov:
and the Filchenkov:
The two ships will be added to a fleet that is becoming increasingly imposing in both numbers and capability: the task force currently includes vessels from the Pacific, Northern, Baltic and Black Sea fleets: the Admiral Panteleyev and Severomorsk destroyers, the Yaroslav Mudry frigate, the Peresvet and Admiral Nevelskoi amphibious warfare ships, the Fotiy Krylov, Altai and SB-921 salvage/rescue tugs, the PM-138 repair ship, the Pechenga, Lena and Dubna tankers. The task force may be enlarged to include nuclear submarines.
Admiral Vladimir Komoyedov, head of the parliamentary defense committee, previously told RIA Novosti that the Mediterranean task force should be comprised of 10 warships and support vessels as part of several tactical groups tasked with attack, antisubmarine warfare and minesweeping.
In other words, check to you America, we are ready.
And speaking of checking, just a month earlier it was the US that was deploying its own naval support in the area with the LHD-3 Kearsarge crossing the Suez canal, and now on anchor in Israel. Here is a 60 second timelapse video of what it looks like when a US naval ship cross the Suez Canal, direction escalation.
“…some observed that while the submarine support was adequate, the actual warship fleet designated to support any potential escalation in Syria would be largely insufficient.”
—-
Only a moron would make this statement as though it were 1918. Observe the above photo of the ‘Azov’. Notice any long barrels protruding from the ship? Of course not! That’s because its MISSILE CRUISER! Now look closely at the ‘white’ cigar shaped objects along the upper side of the ship. There are three of them (due to the angle of the photo, No.2 & No.3 seem to merge into one longer object). These six tubes (three per side) contain the Russian ‘Super Sunburn’ SS-N-26 ONYX missile. Each one capable of being equipped with a 400Kt nuclear warhead (20X the Japan bombs). These missiles have the further capability of achieving a speed of Mach 4 and flying at an altitude of a mere 60 feet! Launched, they would fly undetected right up the skirt of Israel’s ‘Iron Dome’ and transform each and every one of their vaginal cities and major military installations into heat and light on a quantum level.
‘Largely insufficient’? This is accurate only in pertaining to the ‘Iron Dome’ defense against these missiles and the ship that bases them.
These are the ships that were reported in the MSM 3 weeks ago as arriving in order to evacuate Russians in the face of the imminent defeat of Assad by the rebels, the same leaderless rebels who have been thoroughly routed and now almost entirely eradicated from the country – hence the West’s new found keenness for ‘talks’, which are a guise for providing diplomatic cover to an escalation and direct military intervention.
Gettin’ mighty crowded over in that neck of the woods.
Awaiting a ‘Bedford Incident’…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bedford_Incident
Wow! Never saw that one. Sounds pretty intense, judging from the bio.