Senate Torture Report Condemns C.I.A. Interrogation Program

New York Times – by Mark Mazzetti

WASHINGTON — A scathing report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday found that the Central Intelligence Agency routinely misled the White House and Congress about the information it obtained from the detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects, and that its methods were more brutal than the C.I.A. acknowledged either to Bush administration officials or to the public.

The long-delayed report, which took five years to produce and is based on more than six million internal agency documents, is a sweeping indictment of the C.I.A.’s operation and oversight of a program carried out by agency officials and contractors in secret prisons around the world in the years after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It also provides a macabre accounting of some of the grisliest techniques that the C.I.A. used to torture and imprison terrorism suspects.  

Detainees were deprived of sleep for as long as a week, and were sometimes told that they would be killed while in American custody. With the approval of the C.I.A.’s medical staff, some C.I.A. prisoners were subjected to medically unnecessary “rectal feeding” or “rectal hydration” — a technique that the C.I.A.’s chief of interrogations described as a way to exert “total control over the detainee.” C.I.A. medical staff members described the waterboarding of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the chief planner of the Sept. 11 attacks, as a “series of near drownings.”

The report also suggests that more prisoners were subjected to waterboarding than the three the C.I.A. has acknowledged in the past. The committee obtained a photograph of a waterboard surrounded by buckets of water at the prison in Afghanistan commonly known as the Salt Pit — a facility where the C.I.A. had claimed that waterboarding was never used. One clandestine officer described the prison as a “dungeon,” and another said that some prisoners there “literally looked like a dog that had been kenneled.”

During his administration, President George W. Bush repeatedly said that the detention and interrogation program, which President Obama dismantled when he succeeded him, was humane and legal. The intelligence gleaned during interrogations, he said, was instrumental both in thwarting terrorism plots and in capturing senior figures of Al Qaeda.

Mr. Bush, former Vice President Dick Cheney and a number of former C.I.A. officials have said more recently that the program was essential for ultimately finding Osama bin Laden, who was killed by members of the Navy SEALs in May 2011 in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

The Intelligence Committee’s report tries to refute each of these claims, using the C.I.A.’s internal records to present 20 case studies that bolster its conclusion that the most extreme interrogation methods played no role in disrupting terrorism plots, capturing terrorist leaders — even finding Bin Laden.

Read the rest: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/10/world/senate-intelligence-committee-cia-torture-report.html

Read the full report here: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/12/09/world/cia-torture-report-document.html?_r=1

3 thoughts on “Senate Torture Report Condemns C.I.A. Interrogation Program

  1. I’ve been reading this report most of the day and I’m in complete awe. They caught two guys and gave them enhanced interrogation for 24 hrs before they realized they had two of their own informants. What do you say to that? Oop’s sorry about that, here’s a sucker and a snickers, because you know how you are when your hungry.

  2. I strongly suspect the democrats did this in retaliation, for the CIA is the only government agency not willing to follow their programs of implementing socialism into our government.

  3. Blaming this, incredibly small (by government standards) organization serves only to deflect the blame from the “bought and paid for Executive, Senate and House.”
    And we know who pays them off! Wink, wink, nudge, nudge, say no more.
    Lets reel it in. Go back. Completely eliminate the DHS. Abort it. Hey, it’s legal.
    I know we (the USA) aren’t and have never been pure angels. Neither has any other country or government. But, at least, we didn’t flaunt psychopathic criminality in the name of national security (I admit it. I drank the MSM KoolAid).
    I lived in DC during Watergate. I watched the hearings.
    And this current level of corruption (in spite of, or considering everything since the early 20th century) is unprecedented in its flagrant criminality.
    The high ground is gone…under water.
    What a tragic betrayal of American values.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*