September Clues (new version) – No Plane Theory – Breaking The Matrix


Uploaded on Apr 25, 2011 by manchildminister

No passenger planes were involved in the attacks on 9/11.
No plane hit the Pentagon.
No plane crashed in Shanksville.
No planes hit the twin towers.
This documentary explains, how the mass media illusion was created in front of your eyes. Additional research is advised.

This is the Full NEW Version (August 2008)

All credits go to:
Simonshak
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-6…

Socialservice’ website:
http://www.septemberclues.info/

Socialservice’ channel on livevideo:
http://livevideo.com/socialservice

SimonShak’s You-Tube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/simonshack

A high quality version (377MB) of this video is available via torrent from here:
http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/43640…

AUTHOR’S STATEMENT:

SEPTEMBER CLUES – full version

Were the 9/11 broadcasts totally fake computer animations? In order to make up your mind about this, please watch the Addendum here:
SEPTEMBER CLUES addendum
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGyW-0…

Here is the playlist of all my ADDITIONAL 9/11 RESEARCH:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=…

The so-called ‘terror-attack’ of 9/11 was nothing but a psyop or, in other words, a gigantic make-believe simulation. It was pulled off with the active support of the mainstream newsmedia – and their complicity continues to this day. The entire World Trade Center complex – 9 buildings in all – was of course demolished (in bright daylight – hidden behind a smokescreen ) but what we saw on TV was nothing but a prefabricated ‘Hollywood’ movie.

No planes were involved (thus no passengers died) – and no people were killed in the (empty) twin towers. For the perpetrators to kill 3000 white collar workers in New York City would have been the silliest self-inflicted aggravation imaginable. Now, all this may come as a shock to many people. However, the evidence is overwhelming and has been consolidated by the steady efforts of independent researchers from all over the world – who have nothing to gain from spreading false information. Ultimately, it is up to every open-minded individual to look at the available evidence for him/herself. However, please keep in mind that most ‘conspiracy theories’ you may have bumped into (such as Michael Moore’s blockbuster “Fahrenheit 9/11” and the internet blockbuster “Loose Change”) were created to uphold our illusion of living in a world graced with freedom of speech.

For any questions you may have, you are welcome to contact me on my Youtube channel. However, please make sure you first get familiar with my website which contains a concise overview of this longstanding research:

THE SEPTEMBER CLUES website http://www.septemberclues.info

For those seriously interested in media fakery (such as 9/11 and other newsmedia-backed psyops), here is my discussion forum:
THE CLUESFORUM http://www.cluesforum.info

Simon Shack

19 thoughts on “September Clues (new version) – No Plane Theory – Breaking The Matrix

  1. “No planes were involved (thus no passengers died) – and no people were killed in the (empty) twin towers.”

    Excuse me, but two friends of mine died in the collapse of the twin towers, and two relatives barely escaped. Several other friends of mine are dead or dying because they assisted in the rescue operations.

    Please refrain from exposing your utter stupidity by believing, and repeating everything you read.

    One of the reasons that the truth movement can’t make much progress is because people are too willing to believe and repeat anything they hear without doing any research or fact-checking of their own. Childish gullibility seems to have brought the 9-11 Truth Movement back to square one 13 years after the fact, because people are too lazy or too stupid to review what’s already been discovered, and discredited.

    1. I would love to know the names of the two “friends” of yours who died in the towers. My belief, and I have no reason to think otherwise at this point, is that the towers were empty – due to be demolished because of asbestos. I don’t know if there were actual planes/drones used or if no planes were used at all. But after much research on the “victims” of Flight 175, I feel comfortable in my belief that none of those passengers were actually on that flight. Lots of photoshopping and sloppy, unsubstantiated death info. Very amateurish.

  2. Do people not understand the role of disinformation in the “alternative media”?

    doesn’t it sink somewhere into your empty head that spies are constantly writing all manner of non-sense in order to discredit you and everything you say in the eyes of the general public?

    This is more of that non-sense, and it was proven to be non-sense a decade ago when it first appeared. Most of the truthers from that era have given up in frustration, but the spies continue to work, and as a result, this BS rears it’s ugly head once again,

  3. Doesn’t “SimonShak” sound a little bit Jewish to you?
    Do you know of any gentiles named Simon?

    Do you have any idea who’s attacking us, or do you believe it’s just some unknowable power we refer to as “THEM”?

    Grow up. We’re being attacked by a criminal Zionist cabal of Jews. It would make a little bit of sense to question information you gather from Jewish sources.

  4. I disagree with you about the towers the evidence points me to believe planes didn’t hit the building. You have your opinion and I have mine. I only believe in the truth. Truth is singular…

    1. “the evidence points me to believe planes didn’t hit the building”

      You’re obviously not looking at all the evidence, nor questioning the “evidence” you are looking at.

      I had this argument a decade ago and I’m not doing it again. People are going to believe all manner of silliness, and that’s how the world’s populations are as deceived about reality as they are.

    2. “You have your opinion and I have mine”

      My point of view isn’t an opinion. It’s the only version of the story that’s supported by all the facts.

      1. OK, King Jolly Roger!!!

        One last question for you. So you believe a plane hit the Pentagon? Please say yes!!!

        1. No — I’ve said many time that I don’t know what hit the Pentagon, and no one else does either, because we don’t have enough evidence to arrive and any definite conclusion.

          It’s not about belief. That’s for church. Hopefully we’re dealing in a world of what can be proven, and what’s supported by scientific fact.

      2. Well obviously, my “point of view” is an opinion. What I meant to say is that my argument isn’t an opinion.

        Please look at the other outrageous claims made by “SimonShak” here. he discredits himself with most of it.

        The towers were empty? How can you believe anything else he says? I guess we all watched people jumping out of the empty towers.

  5. All I was saying is planes didn’t hit the tower. Obviously people were in the tower. There are plenty more people than just this source providing evidence that planes didn’t hit. Could I have picked a better source? Maybe, after all I’m human. The last thing I’m gonna do is let someone tell me I’m “empty headed” that my friend is a FACT. Instead provide me evidence supporting planes hitting the towers. I’d love to see it.

    1. I already told you that I know people who WATCHED the planes slam into the towers.

      Consider this when assessing sources of info: Why would I lie? What motive for lying would the people I’ve spoken to have?

      People usually lie or make up stories when there’s a reason to, or when there’s something to be gained by it. It really doesn’t make any difference to me if planes hit the towers or not, other than my desire to know, and speak the truth on the matter.

      Zionists have a motive to deceive people, and I don’t

  6. I’m also sorry if I sound a bit short-tempered here, but I’m a bit frustrated with this disinformation angle returning to haunt us once again.

    I had hoped this was behind us long ago, and please remember that I’ve spent years arguing with spies over mini-nukes in the tower, missiles fired from the Woolworth building, the “Webfairy’s” UFOs, and the rest of the endless string of disinformation attacks aimed at discrediting everyone who questions the government’s story.

    It just boils my blood a little to see it returning, because it’s something I defeated a decade ago, which is now returning like a cancer to discredit anyone who questions why we’re engaged in a “war on terror” that lacks any real terrorists.

  7. The “fact” is we will never know “for sure” what happened. Too much stuff out there, you guys are beating a dead horse.

  8. As a former B-52 crewchief, something has always piqued my curiosity as to how an aluminum wing spar could cut through several steel beams with 4″ thick walls.
    I would have thought the most damage would have been done by the engines as they are heavy and compact and tough. When I look at videos of what appears to be where the wings sliced through the building, I just wonder ‘how could that be’? No way aluminum cuts steel, I don’t care if it was going 400+mph.

  9. all I know is I’m a downloading sob… and with all my experience and different ways of downloading I can NOT get this vid… kind of fishy….

  10. I cannot attest to the validity of the empty building premise, as I’ve done zero research on that angle, but no planes ever hit those towers. Period.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*