listen here

Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Suit to stop the NYPD’s planned implementation of “street body scanners” dismissed



MassPrivateI

On January 28th., 2013 Johnathan Corbett filed the first and only lawsuit against the NYPD’s testing and planned implementation of “street body scanners”.

The terahertz imaging devices are designed to allow cops to peer under the clothes of unsuspecting passersby on the street for guns. This surveillance tool plainly ignores the Fourth Amendment’s requirement, made clear in Terry v. Ohio, that searches must have cause. By checking underneath the clothing of the public at random, the NYPD proposes to conduct the most widespread and general search ever demanded (outside of the airport checkpoint, of course).

The gadget will be mounted on an NYPD van with the infrared rays shooting up the street at the person.  NYPD police commissioner Ray Kelly said the device only works at a short range – 3 to 4 feet away – but that he’s hoping it will operate at a farther distance of 25 meters.

The large mechanism uses infrared rays to scan a “form of radiation emitted from the body” of someone who is concealing a gun on the streets

U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe ruled today, however, that the suit must wait because the immanency and effects of the NYPD’s proposed scanner use are, at this time, uncertain and speculative. This issue touches a gray area where, on the one hand, courts are allowed to protect the people from imminent loss of liberty, they must balance this against the constitutional requirement that only a live controversy may be reviewed.

The facts of this matter are that: 1) the NYPD has paid millions of dollars to fund the development of these devices, 2) the NYPD has procured at least one of these devices, and 3) NYPD Commissioner Kelly has stated his intent to begin use of the devices as soon as possible.

Corbett thinks reasonable people could disagree as to whether this constitutes a situation where a constitutional injury is imminent, and it is, of course, no surprise that any benefit of the doubt be sent the government’s way by a federal judge. As of now, Corbett doesn’t plan on appealing the ruling, but is watching for the first sign that the NYPD has brought these machines into public, at which point Corbett will move to re-open the case. “Let the NYPD be on notice: if you start to scan the public, you will be sued on Day 1.”
http://tsaoutofourpants.wordpress.com/2013/09/17/federal-judge-suit-to-stop-nypd-street-body-scanners-must-wait/ 
http://gothamist.com/2013/01/23/nypd_takes_delivery_of_van-mounted.php 

Corbett v. City of New York II – Dismissed  

—————-

http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2013/09/suit-to-stop-nypds-planned.html

This entry was posted in News, Videos. Bookmark the permalink.
1913

3 Responses to Suit to stop the NYPD’s planned implementation of “street body scanners” dismissed

  1. Enbe says:

    Oh, great – NOT! As though it weren’t enough for the New York Pervert Department to publicly sexually assault New Yorkers by feeling breasts and testicles, which they wrongly call frisking, now Bloomberg’s perverted army has decided they will cook the “useless eaters” skin and cause cataracts and blindness with concentrated directed infrared rays. Sheesh. Criminal gangs with badges. When do The People start fighting back?

  2. dph says:

    The reporter calls this technology a “ray of hope”. Disgusting. They are already preparing similar terahertz wave scanners for airports/border crossings. At the airport, they’re out of sight, so you won’t know you’re being scanned. Just walk down the hall or toward the restroom, & a quick scan tells them what you had for breakfast. The airport scanners are made by Genia Photonics & connected to In-Q-Tel, the investment arm of the US intel community. The NY scanners are being developed at CalTech. They’ll no doubt soon have these things wherever people congregate.

  3. Mark says:

    Science fiction becomes science fact.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CX9Agzeh-c

Leave a Reply