A Warning to All Gun Bloggers and Forums – Boston Marathon Explosions

Guns America

Dear Friends,

Please be aware that there are what we call “Bloomberg shills” lurking in the comments of gun blogs and forums at present. It has been going on since before the election, and we first noticed it as far back as our January 8th, 2012 article “2nd Amendment Voters Should Vote Ron Paul.” At first it seemed like fun because they got a lively discussion going, and many of our articles have over 400 comments just because of a few anti-gun comments peppered in by a shill here and there. But as more and more of them have come in, we have begun to realize that it is better to delete them. The anti-gunners have a plan, and that plan is to make gun people look stupid, heartless, and separate from the values of mainstream America. A recent “whistleblower” post about the Boston Marathon explosions is especially troubling. If you are part of a gun blog or forum, please don’t allow this post to spread, and beware that more attempts to make 2nd Amendment defenders look bad are coming.  

As most of us have come to understand, this crisis has gone far beyond politics. We have seen an unprecedented and sustained attack on not just our guns, but the entire pro-2nd Amendment and avid shooter culture itself. We are being sold to the public as stupid and selfish people who don’t care about the safety of children. I got a forwarded Facebook post from an 86 year old family friend and staunch Libertarian yesterday that said “The NRA Doesn’t Represent Me.” If only he knew what a fool he is being played for, but if you read through the lines, it is pretty clear that Bloomberg’s media campaign is working. The medicated masses are buying the story, because it is being presented in social media environment where people have already let their guards down.

For that reason, we have ceased to allow any anti-gun comments on our articles. This was a difficult decision, but we only did so after calling out several of the commenters and directly accusing them of being hired Bloomberg shills. None of them defended themselves, and we believe that this is exactly what they are. The anti-gunners aren’t just buying TV ads. They are hiring what are probably unemployed young people in New York City to fish around in pro-2nd Amendment social media to plant seeds of division, trying to hook the emotions of the vulnerable and anti-depressant medicated.

A common theme among the shills is to make us look stupid and ruthless in the furtherment of our cause. We think that they threw some bait into the water yesterday that could make gun people look very bad. It is a “whistleblower” post about the explosions at the Boston Marathon, warning that it is some kind of false flag to ban the private sale of gun powder. I believe this “warning” is meant to be re-posted on gun blogs and boards, and on a quick Google search, I see that it has already hit the FAL Files and a few survival boards. We am not going to include the post in this email because there is no benefit in spreading it, but it begins “I work on a security commission and I’ve just received word to start on a campaign we’ve been working on for the last two months and now it all makes sense.”

The “warning” then goes on to say that that explosions were a pre-planned event meant to result in the banning of the private sale of gun powder, and that a young person is to be arrested Friday with NRA magazines in his possession. The creators of this farce are hoping Alex Jones and all of the conspiracy websites pick it up, and some of them already have. We believe that this is a Bloomberg shill to make us look stupid, and ruthless, that we would co-opt a tragedy to further our cause. Obama’s people have indeed already tried to tie the explosions to “Tax Day” in the hopes of making right wingers look like terrorists, but as we have explained before, Alex Jones is a turd in the punchbowl of 2nd Amendment freedom. You don’t have to have any “theory” about the conspiracy to take away our 2nd Amendment rights. American “gun control” was born in the aftermath of slavery, to keep guns out of the hands of freed slaves. Today it continues. The anti-gunners are using the deaths of 20 white kids to keep the guns out of the hands of their racial minority voting “slaves” in the inner cities.

It could very well be that consumer black powder, not smokeless powder, was used to make those bombs. Upon seeing the billowing white clouds of smoke from the explosions, anyone who has ever shot black powder should probably have suspected that this was the explosive used. Bomb detecting equipment, and most likely the dogs as well, are not trained to detect black powder. I know this because I freaked out one day when I had to go through a airport sniffer after shooting BP. I hadn’t even washed my hands and realized it only when I was far too deep into the line. But the sniffer didn’t even hiccup. We have all heard the reports that the police were doing bomb dog drills before the explosions, and it could very well be that one dog thought he smelled something early in the day so they brought in more dogs, who unfortunately weren’t trained to sniff BP.

Somebody grabbed the obvious possibility that black powder was involved and turned it into this fake “whistleblower” post about the more generic term “gun powder.” Apparently U.S. Rep. Mike McCaul, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said “most likely gun powder” was used in the devices. The “Lone Wolf” language of that article does make it sound like they will pin this on a “right wing terrorist,” but what makes this “whistleblower” warning so suspect as a shill is that they do not specify black powder. As many of you know, modern smokeless powder, the kind you find in normal ammunition, does not explode when ignited. It burns, and it is of course also fairly “smokeless.” Billowing clouds of white smoke like the ones we saw in Boston only come from black powder, and it is a lot easier to get than C4, and you don’t have to make it like the concoctions they speak about in the bomb making books. Granted, McCaul did specifically say “gun powder,” but it is just too convenient that this post showed up yesterday, at the same time the talking point was implanted into the discussion. The post is almost definitely fake, and planted by people trying to make us look bad.

It is your choice how you treat and respond to anti-gun comments in a pro-2nd Amendment environment here on the internet. Please just be aware that these Bloomberg shills are lurking in your comments and on your boards, and that this is most likely only one of what will be many attempts to make 2nd Amendment defenders appear to have different ideals than mainstream America. We are mainstream America, and after the Heller and McDonald Supreme Court decisions, we were on our way to giving the opportunities of “mainstream” to all Americans. Arm the permanent victims in our inner cities and we will give them back not just 2nd Amendment freedom, but all of the other freedoms they are robbed of by living under the umbrella of a permanent criminal narco-economy. The Wild West didn’t have the violent crime rates of Chicago and Washington DC, because in the Wild West, the good guys could shoot back.


12 thoughts on “A Warning to All Gun Bloggers and Forums – Boston Marathon Explosions

  1. You folks are spot on with this post! Good job. If you happen to be on a site and see someone baiting you. Step away. Shills are paid to make you look like an idiot. Don’t help there cause.

  2. Jim Stone Freelance posted this whistleblower testimony. I personally don’t think it is “black helicopters” paranoid. In fact, it is quite possible. You guys do remember 9/11 and the anthrax lie, correct? Better ye read it for yourself than pass judgement in ignorance.

  3. The Oath Keepers, a group of law enforcement and military promise upholders are to meet in two days near Boston. Perhaps this meeting being so close to the Marathon blast might be used to make the Constitution and Second Amendment supporters look bad.
    Keep an eyeball on this .

  4. I have to admit that, when relaying ANY information from one Internet source to other sources on the Internet, I ALWAYS try to leave that little bit of doubt about the truthfullness of that information. In other words, it’s better to relay the information with the understanding that the information may be wrong, than to not relay it at all and to find out later that it’s correct. Personally, I DID see this post (from the topic above) on a web site, but it didn’t come across as being from a shill. I’m not saying it’s not from a shill. I’m saying “cover your ass” by ALWAYS letting people know that there is some doubt as to the truthfullness of ANY information, especially if you cannot confirm, from its source, that it IS true.

  5. Great story & spot on! Seen the shills hitting other news outlet sites. Another reason I went to lurking & quit posting; the elevated BP caused by these commie POS ain’t worth a baby aspirin.

  6. When dealing with shills trolls or any butt head I find the thing to remember is stick only to the facts and don’t let them draw you out into false arguments. No cursing them or insults. Better is to find some way to label them with the truth. These people have their tactics but are completely befuddled when you turn the tables, but do it in a mild, moderate tone. Like someone talking to a child.

    Most anti gun people are pro abortion and pro gay. Its hard to defend a, I care about the kids so give up your rights for their sake once you nail them with the truth of, that they support murdering over a million a year. Better yet ask them if they are pro life or pro death. Switch it around on them. But no insults. Its tough. Sometimes you just have to walk away, and sometimes thats best. Usually they go after someone who has made a killer point. You made your point then leave it. especially if you can not reply in a milder fashion than the troll with a smarter answer to shut them up.

    I’m not for deletion of comments just because of what they said. No. Not for denying one right in a fight to protect another. Thats not righteous.If they are allowed to post then anything they have to say should be heard. I like a lively debate and you can’t have that preaching to the choir.

    1. We do not allow soviet socialists, national socialists, or trolls of any nature on this site. The conversations are always lively without any assholes disrupting the flow of information. And we violate no one’s rights as they have the Fox, CNN, and MSNBC sites to spew their treason on.

      1. I guess that saves me the time of running them off, not that I post very often on this site. Great articles though.

  7. Excellent article.

    The reason I quit posting on sites other than this one was trolls.

    Not worth my time.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *