Alexander Hamilton Writes About the Importance of Uniform Rules of Naturalization Vs. The Unconstitutional Amnesty Proposal Pathway to Citizenship

The Lone Star Watchdog

The wave of illegal Aliens crossing the border with the promise of being legalized for just showing up. Barrack Obama is doing this for a multi faceted reasons. There is panic in the air among the globalist he works for to take down America hook and by crook before the Americans rise up and remove the New World Order from power.

He needs a voting block of an unskilled dependent and an uneducated underclass with no loyalty to the United States to vote for socialism. He is implementing measures so these invaders can register as Democrats so they can go to the poles and vote for government handouts to bankrupt the country and steal our God given freedoms.  

The Federalist writer Alexander Hamilton speaks very clear about why we have naturalization laws when new immigrants arrive on our shores or entering any other legal point of entry into the country. The founders were very passionate about the necessity of a process as a true pathway of citizenship outlined in the Constitution. Congress has the duty of writing the naturalization laws in Article 1 section 8 stating:

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

This is why Amnesty is unconstitutional because it is not uniform and rewards the wrong behavior when a person enters the country illegally is given preferential treatment over those who played by the rules who want to be real Americans.

The President of the United States only power is to enforce the laws passed by the Congress and singed into law by the President. Article 2 section 1

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.

Also in Article 2 section 3:

he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.

Barrack Obama is making law and not executing the laws of Congress that has the constitutional jurisdiction over immigration and naturalization laws that are supposed to be ” Uniform” meaning being no respecter of persons. Meaning no ethnic people or a group of forefingers shall not be given preference over another for political reasons or for corporate special interest to profit at the expense of the nation and the economy

Even back in the early years of America. Immigration was a hot button issue back in that period of our early days as a young nation. Even Alexander Hamilton agreeing with Thomas Jefferson said when there is no uniform naturalization process can put the very young republic in peril writing:

“The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias, and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education, and family.

“The opinion advanced in the Notes on Virginia is undoubtedly correct, that foreigners will generally be apt to bring with them attachments to the persons they have left behind; to the country of their nativity, and to its particular customs and manners. They will also entertain opinions on government congenial with those under which they have lived; or, if they should be led hither from a preference to ours, how extremely unlikely is it that they will bring with them that temperate love of liberty, so essential to real republicanism? There may, as to particular individuals, and at particular times, be occasional exceptions to these remarks, yet such is the general rule. The influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to produce a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities. In the composition of society, the harmony of the ingredients is all-important, and whatever tends to a discordant intermixture must have an injurious tendency.

“The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others, it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils. It has been often likely to compromise the interests of our own country in favor of another. The permanent effect of such a policy will be, that in times of great public danger there will be always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone will weaken the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader.

Does that sound like what is going on today where the President has collapsed the borders bringing in a group of people to make legal without any lawful sound process to be registered voters not familiar of our own form of government and our history.  Foreign people unwilling to learn our language or the principles that made our country great.

in the same essay sums up the reason for a uniform process of naturalization as a matter of national security stating and the preservation of the republic:

The present law was merely a temporary measure adopted under peculiar circumstances, and perhaps demands revision. But there is a wide difference between closing the door altogether and throwing it entirely open; between a postponement of fourteen years, and an immediate admission to all the rights of citizenship. Some reasonable term ought to be allowed to enable aliens to get rid of foreign and acquire American attachments; to learn the principles and imbibe the spirit of our government; and to admit of a probability at least, of their feeling a real interest in our affairs. A residence of not less than five years ought to be required.

“If the rights of naturalization may be communicated by parts, and it is not perceived why they may not, those peculiar to the conducting of business and the acquisition of property, might with propriety be at once conferred, upon receiving proof, by certain prescribed solemnities, of the intention of the candidates to become citizens; postponing all political privileges to the ultimate term. To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens, the moment they put foot in our country, as recommended in the message, would be nothing less than to admit the Grecian horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty.”

This is why we must resist Amnesty at all cost because of the consequences that follow when a people are not educated on the principles, history and language so they can over a period of time sever their ties from the country they left to be loyal Americans.

Reading what Alexander Hamilton wrote. There is nothing new under the sun. This is why for our national survival must hold Congress and the President accountable who bypass immigration and naturalization laws to favor one group over another to satisfy special interest for profit and political motivation to hold onto power.

If we can not deport most of these people mainly children coming up from Mexico, Central and South America who have a hatred of America and contempt for the people. Then we must demand congress that these people learn the language and go through the naturalization process long enough to be severed from any ties their place of birth having making an informed choice renouncing their allegiance to the country they came from. Taking an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution being loyal to the United States embracing the principles that made America great or be deported to their homeland if they do not conform to our criteria to stay here.

Even though I disagree with Alexander Hamilton on many issues. His analysis on Immigration hits the nail on the head explaining why we need a uniform process of naturalization. Compared to the discriminating proposal of Amnesty giving  pathway to citizenship to a group of people who broke the law entering America violating our borders. These lawbreakers who violated our sovereignty are given  priority over those who obeyed the law to come here and be a part of the American experience who will make great citizens contributing much to society.

We must hold congress and the President accountable because Immigration and Naturalization laws are there to protect the nation preserving our republican form of government with a society that embraces liberty. They are not being enforced. We need to bring back the “rule of Law” so the best, the motivated and the brightest can come here to participate in the land of the free and the home of the brave leaving the old country and it ties behind. What do you think?

2 thoughts on “Alexander Hamilton Writes About the Importance of Uniform Rules of Naturalization Vs. The Unconstitutional Amnesty Proposal Pathway to Citizenship

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.