D.A. drops first SAFE Act charge in county

SAFE Act courtRegister Star – by Gail Heinsohn For Hudson-Catskill Newspapers

District Attorney Paul Czajka dropped a state SAFE Act charge Thursday in county district court against Hopewell Junction resident Gregory Dean Jr., who was the first person charged in the county under the controversal law since it was enacted last month.

Czajka told Town Justice Jessica Byrne that he would not prosecute the SAFE act violation.  

“Although I believe that it is not for a district attorney to determine or make blanket policy,” Czajka told Byrne, he said he would “decline to prosecute the unlawful possession of ammunition feed devices.”

“There are a lot of factors that go into a decision that a District Attorney makes,” Czajka said after the court proceedings. “Given the circumstances of this case, it was my decision to exercise my prosecutorial discretion” and decline prosecution of the charge until and unless a higher court rules on the law.

A planned protest of the prosecution of the SAFE Act charge resulted in eight protestors standing outside the New Lebanon courthouse.

But the protest was dissolved when Czajka announced he would not prosecute the SAFE act violation.

Czajka offered a reduction in the other charges against Dean, but Dean’s attorney, Jonna Spilbor, of Poughkeepsie, declined to accept the deal.

“We were prepared to fight like hell” on the SAFE act violation, she said in court, “but we would decline the opportunity to plead on that.”

They will return to Town Court in June.

Czajka told Byrne that there would be “no need for a jury trial.”

The case drew widespread media attention across the state.

Spilbor said she was glad members of the press were present.

“The SAFE Act is something that I think a lot of us are unhappy about,” Spilbor said. “The D.A. took the legs out of the SAFE Act for this particular case.”

Dean was stopped by state police May 12 in New Lebanon for a license-plate bulb that was out. During the motor vehicle stop, police allegedly found Dean in possession of a handgun with a magazine that contained nine bullets, instead of the legal amount of seven under the new law, which went into effect April 15. Dean has been quoted as saying that he was unaware of the law.

He was charged with being in possession of illegal ammunition feeding devices, as well as aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle, both of which are misdemeanors, and a traffic infraction for the missing light.

Dean said after court he was “grateful for all the support” he’d received. Spilbor advised him not to answer further questions.

Outside the courthouse, Czajka was questioned about other laws he did not plan to prosecute.

Czajka replied that he “make[s] a decision on each case,” based on the circumstances.

He was, he said, “not making a decision with respect to any particular issue,” only a “particular case. I consider every case on its own merits.”

http://www.registerstar.com/news/article_9ef63df4-c426-11e2-9437-001a4bcf887a.html

4 thoughts on “D.A. drops first SAFE Act charge in county

  1. Happy to see this D.A. saw things in a different light. Hope he gets re-elected. The SAFE act is nothing but buy outs by Politicians. None of those so called massacres even happened in NY. We’re not crazy here in NY, that’s down in the city.

  2. Well, I’m NOT happy about this. When this republic is rightfully returned to the tenets of common law, all these LEOs, prosecutors, magistrates, and judges need to be prosecuted for rights violations and fraudulent collection of revenue, prosecution of which should include spouses since they are also enjoying the fruits of fraud.

    Who was the injured party here? NO ONE. A license plate bulb my azz.

  3. Glad to see the D.A. drop the charge for this ridiculous ‘law’. Hoping NYS Sheriffs step in and take the higher ground ASAP. The rest of America is watching and looking for leadership.

  4. No, no, no. Don’t “decline to prosecute the unlawful possession of ammunition feed devices.” Take the law off the books.

    When they “decline to prosecute” something, what they do is only prosecute people they don’t like. There should be no law unless it applies to everyone, and is equally enforced.

    The decision in this case was made for the press. What happens a month from now will be a different story.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*