MOUNT VERNON, Va. (AP) — It is the unavoidable Achilles’ heel in the reputation of George Washington and so many other Founding Fathers: that men who risked their lives to protect their nation’s liberty were also slaveholders.
That dichotomy will be explored in a new exhibit at Washington’s Mount Vernon estate, in a museum space previously dedicated to exhibitions featuring Washington’s furniture, fineries and his penchant for dining on syrupy hoecakes.
The $750,000 exhibition, Lives Bound Together, will explore hard truths about Washington’s life as a slaveholder, including an acknowledgement that Washington’s adopted son likely fathered a child with one of the family’s slaves.
Mount Vernon has not shied away from explorations of slavery: In 2007, the estate reconstructed a slave cabin on the grounds about a mile from the iconic mansion. And Mount Vernon has worked to maintain good relations with the descendants of Mount Vernon slaves, many of whom still live in the area.
Still, Mount Vernon director Curtis Viebranz said he occasionally hears criticism — both from people who believe there is too much discussion of slavery, to those who say they won’t visit Mount Vernon because they are offended at supporting what was, at bottom, a plantation fueled by slave labor.
He expects the new exhibit will inevitably draw criticism in one form or another. “There might be some people of my generation who would prefer to leave him on his pedestal,” Viebranz said. “Our challenge as an institution is to make the story of this man topical to the next generation of Americans. … If we try to control the story, or direct it to an outcome, it will hurt us.”
A centerpiece of the new exhibit, which will launch in October, is a display of Washington’s handwritten list of slaves on the estate from 1799, likely written in preparation for his will. Washington freed his slaves in his will, upon the death of his wife, Martha. She ended up freeing the slaves before she died. Other slaves belonged to Martha Washington’s family, and neither George nor Martha had any legal right to emancipate them.
The list, in Washington’s bold, instantly recognizable handwriting, is a powerful connection to the man himself and the men and women who were registered as his property. The list also includes some commentary on the slaves. Washington describes 28-year-old Tom as “a good mower and an excellent ploughman but unfortunately from some tumour in his head, it is feared that blindness, partial if not entire, will ensue.”
Throughout the exhibit, Mount Vernon endeavors to tell the story of 19 slaves who lived on the estate. Washington’s meticulous record-keeping helped in some of the reconstruction, but curator Susan Schoelwer acknowledged limitations: The slaves were largely illiterate, so any written records about them come from the whites who oversaw them.
“We try to explore their stories,” Schoelwer said. “I would not presume to tell them.” Still, Mount Vernon is not totally reliant on whites’ perspective to tell the story. Oral histories passed down by slaves’ descendants fill some of the gaps.
For ZSun-nee Matema of Hagerstown, Maryland, the family history was whispered and talked around, but always present. “My father’s people told me that if everything were known about our family’s history, it would topple the first family of Virginia,” Matema recalled.
She didn’t really know what to make of the cryptic comments. Matema always knew that she was a descendant of Caroline Branham, a slave who served as a house servant and was the person who found Washington ill in his bed the morning of his death in December 1799.
As she became more interested in her family’s genealogy, she did her own research, which seemed to mesh with her family’s oral history. The scholarship is at the point where Mount Vernon, in the materials it is preparing for the exhibit, concludes that Caroline Branham’s daughter Lucy was “likely fathered by George Washington Parke Custis.”
That means Matema, in addition to being a descendant of Branham, is also a direct descendant of Martha Washington, since Parke Custis was also the grandson of Martha in addition to being the adopted son of George Washington.
Matema, for her part, said she credits Mount Vernon for its effort to tell the story of Mount Vernon’s slaves as fully as it can, in the face of the limitations of researching an era when people were considered property.
“There will probably never be a full story told of the enslaved community,” she said.
Sure they do, how else would they get him off the 1$ bill ,and desecrate his history ..This is about destroying this country and its legacy and history , so the Oligarchy can rule us with a Dictator
its either that or another distraction Like the Confederate Flag game they played , and all the southern heritage they destroyed
what ever .. you can take the Flag out of the confederacy or from view, but you can’t take the Confederacy out of the people
Its also a White thing.. us Caucasians are being singled out .. you can bet if he were a black man that held White slaves nothing would be heard about, given this day and age
its the same old game
Divide and Conquer .. because if we Unite .. they are screwed !
Oh hell they grew that five leaf weed I can not spell for a letter found in Washington’s papers complained his male plants had not arrived yet.
Gee they owned guns too and did all they could to make sure everyone had one.
Not to mention they wore wigs. lace shirts and tight pants, god forbid.
Oh do not forget most were theists not Christians.
Hang them high LOL
“It is the unavoidable Achilles’ heel in the reputation of George Washington and so many other Founding Fathers: that men who risked their lives to protect their nation’s liberty were also slaveholders.”
It’s not an “unavoidable Achilles’ heel” in anyone’s reputation as far as thinking people are concerned, but you can always depend on a Zionist yellow-rag trash newspaper like the “Daily Mail” to make an issue out of it.
Please understand that slavery was as acceptable 200 years ago as owning a dog is today, because the science of the day defined Africans as a different species. They were not even considered human at the time, so no slave owner’s action could be considered “inhumane.” Looking back 200 years to vilify people over anything is ridiculous, unless it’s done comparatively to other people’s behavior at the time.
The founding fathers owned slaved because they were businessmen, and it’s impossible to be competitive in any business if you’re the only one paying your employees.
Why are there no complaints about the doctors of that time, who treated insanity by drilling holes in the skull to release evil spirits? Because it can’t add fuel to the “divide and conquer” process; that’s why.
And a bigger question is “why are all these people who are worried about ancient slavery, completely unconcerned with modern slavery?