Nevada Sheriff Facing Recall over His Plans to Enforce Red Flag Law

Breitbart – by AWR Hawkins

The sheriff of Humbolt County, Nevada, is facing recall over his plans to implement the state’s red flag law.

The Nevada Independent reports that Sheriff Mike Allen says he opposes the law personally, yet will enforce it once it takes effect in 2020. 

Allen was asked if he will send SWAT to homes to take away guns, and he responded in a way that convinced county residents he will come while they are not home. Allen said, “We do whatever we do to make it as safe as possible. And if what’s as safe as possible is to wait for that individual to leave the house, then that’s what we’ll do. Most of the time there will be other laws that we’ll be able to apply.”

Dawn Principe, the owner of Sage Hill Arms in Winnemucca, is leading Humboldt County 2nd Amendment Grassroots in an effort to recall Allen.

Allen’s plan to enforce the state’s red flag law comes less than a month after the Humboldt County Commissioners adopted “Second Amendment Sanctuary” status. The sanctuary declaration says, in part, “Neither the United States Congress nor the Nevada legislature should entertain consideration of any legislation that would infringe on constitutionally protected rights under the Second Amendment.”

Sheriff Allen spoke with Breitbart News, saying, “Where in the U.S. Constitution, or the Nevada constitution, can I pick and choose what laws I enforce?”

When asked about the Second Amendment Sanctuary declaration in particular, Allen said, “There’s no legal basis for the sanctuary declaration, for a sanctuary basis.”

Allen added, “I’ve never violated anybody’s constitutional rights, nor will I.”

He said, “I stand by the Second Amendment and everybody’s constitutional rights.”

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/28/nevada-sheriff-facing-recall-his-plans-enforce-red-flag-law/

19 thoughts on “Nevada Sheriff Facing Recall over His Plans to Enforce Red Flag Law

  1. As it should be

    And if they were really serious about it, he would already be held in a cell stepped of any perceived power,so he can’t pull any stupid shit

    His statement is straight up Treason
    And should be getting delt with swiftly and definitively

    This is where you get to prove to them yer not backing down , don’t Fck it up

  2. Nevada is one state you dont want to fence sit. Either your pro gun or not, if your not you sure as hell dont want to be sherriff. People there have had it, especially since Harry Reid has ruined this state. Nevada has a long way to go to get back to what they once were.

    Used to be a great state, really would love to see things get back to normal. Harry Reid really fkd things up.

  3. “Allen added, “I’ve never violated anybody’s constitutional rights, nor will I.”

    “He said, “I stand by the Second Amendment and everybody’s constitutional rights.”

    This guy is dumber than a box of rocks! For him to make these comments after he already said he’ll wait to people are gone then go into their homes and get guns.

  4. “Where in the U.S. Constitution, or the Nevada constitution, can I pick and choose what laws I enforce?”

    Um, remember that oath, f**kwad?!

    This is the problem with trumpanzees. They can’t put 1 and 1 together and come up with 2!!!!!

    If a “law” violates the Bill of Rights in the Constitution and you enforce it, you are VIOLATING THEIR RIGHTS AND YOUR OATH!!!

    Geez, it ain’t rockit surgery?!

    1. It is not just the oath to protect and defend, the Bill of Rights is ratified law. To infringe on it in any way is a violation of the superior supreme law of this land, punishable by the people. What he is suggesting in reference to confiscation makes him a criminal and a traitor.
      A real sheriff, not of the corporate admiralty but of the common law jurisdiction, would raise a posse and arrest the traitors that wrote this policy and attempted to have it enforced. They then would be tried for treason and sedition by that sheriff as an individual, and when found guilty, would face the jury and a rope. That is the law, the supreme law, the superior law, the law that can never be changed.

      1. That makes more sense to me. It’s a total violation of our bill of rights. These traitors have gotten way too bold.

  5. “Allen added, “I’ve never violated anybody’s constitutional rights, nor will I.”

    No, you just trample our Bill of Rights, traitor.

    You’re done, b#tch.

  6. Here in Mesa County, Colorado, the sheriff has stated he will be following Colorado’s Red Flag laws once they start up with the new year. More than half of Colorado Sheriffs are Constitutional and said they’d would follow no laws like that. We are the only county around western Colorado with a back stabbing Sheriff, Sheriff Lewis. The reason being is that Grand Junction has slowly been turning towards the Democrat voter and he doesn’t want to lose votes.

    1. No offense there, Josh, but there can be no such thing as a constitutional sheriff as the Constitution has been replaced by a corporate charter. See Title 28 Definition 15.
      All so called law enforcement are private corporate blackwater entities.
      As for the notion of the vote, there is no vote, there can only be a corporate endorsement from your strawman corporation for the unlawful United States Corporation and its subcontractors which are the state corporations.
      The corporation is unlawful and represents an occupation of our country. To participate in any occupational selection is an act of treason against the individual free sovereign American nationals.
      You are obviously a Trumptard who doesn’t have a clue of what has been done to our country and our unalienable ratified law known as the Bill of Rights.
      You are a 14th Amendment SUBJECT citizen who is participating, whether knowingly or unknowingly, in treason.
      The Bill of Rights is not just a piece of paper. It is the supreme ratified law for the united States of the Americas that is we the people’s supreme authority within the common law.
      I don’t aim to bash you, but you need to educate yourself. I wrote this comment to tell you in a kind way because the rest of the individual free sovereign nationals on this site will not.
      If you want to know the truth you are in the right place.
      If you want to push a corporate agenda, you are in the wrong place.
      It is like this, there are no democrats, there are no republicans, no conservatives, no liberals, no left, no right, there is just the law or there is not, and right now there is not, because we the people et.al. are negligent in enforcing the supreme law of this land, which by that law, only we can enforce.
      There is not one quasi constitutional sheriff that does not violate that law every day through enforcement of corporate legislated policy that is in violation of the people’s law and the people’s authority.

      1. Thank you for the reply. I was only giving an update pertaining to the article, concerning our area. I did not voice my ideas or beliefs. So much for a “heads up”, or here’s what’s going on in such a such place. Just trying to point out some news going on.

        1. In your comment you stated “More than half of Colorado Sheriffs are Constitutional” and “Grand Junction has slowly been turning towards the Democrat voter and he doesn’t want to lose votes.”
          All righty, Josh, to be fair about it, I’ll ask you. Are you a registered voter, and if so, what corporate party are you registered with, and do you believe that there is such a thing in this corporate aristocracy as a Constitutional Sheriff? Do you believe there can be a Constitutional Sheriff that enforces any legislation coming from the illegitimate United States Corporation or its state subcontractors? Can there be a Constitutional Sheriff who is not sworn in to the common law?
          All sheriffs in this corporate aristocracy swear to uphold the legislation of the state and federal corporations, though they have to know that this occupational state and federal has no jurisdiction to write and attempt to enforce any legislation that violates any part of the ratified supreme law of the Bill of Rights, as dictated by our 9th Article.
          I wasn’t picking on you, I was just trying to let you know where you are in the Trenches. If I would have just let your comment go through unanswered, the people on this site would have not been so kind to you as I was.
          Like I said, if you want to learn what has been done to our country and how and by whom, welcome. If you do not understand that the Republic has been subverted for a hundred years by an unlawful corporation and you believe a Constitutional Sheriff means a real sheriff, you are mistaken. You will find out how mistaken on this site.
          We know exactly what is going on across this country and we know the so called democrats and so called republicans, the communists and the Fabian capitalists, all shit through the same hole and are adjoined in the effort to subjugate the American national under the unlawful 14th Amendment, which names us as subjects of this corporate aristocracy.
          We are not corporate subjects and will not be subjugated through hook or crook or force. This country is at war, the 14th Amendment and corporate subjugation, which the so called Constitutional Sheriffs are a part of, in violation of the 9th Article of we the people’s ratified law, and the states are in violation under the 10th Article.
          We will not hear the words Constitutional Sheriff because we know they are a lie, designed to buffer the reality of the blackwater standing army called police that has been instituted unlawfully by an unlawful occupation.
          So, what do you think on these matters?

          1. Thanks, Henry. Am learning a lot from your response. I Googled Title 28 Definition 15:

            “15 – United States means a Federal corporation.”

            “People also ask: Is the United States a country or a federal corporation?”

            “US is a corporation, not a country. THE UNITED STATES (in capitals) isn’t a country; it’s a corporation.”

            “A government corporation is a government agency that is established by Congress to provide a market-oriented public service and to produce revenues that meet or approximate its expenditures. … The government corporation model has been utilized by the federal government for over a century.”

            You’ve been teaching about this for years, Henry, but I did not know it was out there in officialdom; I thought it was only discerning minds that saw through the deception. But here in the definitions I found, they are actually owning it. It was the first time I actually saw it in print. Chilling, to say the least.

            .

        2. Hey josh, you’re either a (D)ickface or a (R)etard, because neither of those letters matter here. They are BOTH one and the same and are traitors, either by support or fraternity.

          Why the F else would you say
          “The reason being is that Grand Junction has slowly been turning towards the Democrat voter and he doesn’t want to lose votes.” ?

          What the F does it matter what their “letter” is as YOU are the one who brought it up, mf?

          You’re either a torie or an assh…. to step up here half cocked and think you’re gonna be snarky with Henry and not get called on your B.S. It may work elsewhere, but not here.

          You weren’t slighted in the least and were given plenty of wiggle room to explain yourself, but you played “mr-know-it-all”.

          Well go F yourself, josh.

          Thanks for the “heads up”, as if any of what you said means a rat’s pile of shite re (D) or (R) and your inability to walk backwards out the F’g door your stupid commie supporting arse just stepped through.

    1. Thanks, Katie. Good resources. I will study. If I clear it one word at a time I will comprehend.

      I sure can’t wait to be out from under all this. And this Title 28/15 has to become another talking point to whomever will listen. What a humongous deception we have to expose.

      I can’t tell you how many years (close to 20) I’ve been hearing that we’re a corporation, and about the “all capitals” thing in US, and the driver’s license names in caps, but till today I never understood how profound all that is in terms of them thinking they own us.

      Well, at lease we’re pulling away the layers, and hard as some of these comments’ confrontations are, there’s usually so much to learn from them.

      .

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*