OK to sell widow’s home over $6 bill, judge rules

Eileen Battisti’s Aliquippa, Pa. home was sold off after she failed to pay a $6.30 interest charge that ballooned to $235 over two years.Philly.com

BEAVER, Pa. (AP) – A widow was given ample notice before her $280,000 house was sold at a tax auction three years ago over $6.30 in unpaid interest, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled.

The decision last week turned down Eileen Battisti’s request to reverse the September 2011 sale of her home outside Aliquippa in western Pennsylvania.

“I paid everything, and didn’t know about the $6.30,” Battisti said. “For the house to be sold just because of $6.30 is crazy.”

Battisti, who still lives in the house, said Monday that she plans to appeal to Commonwealth Court. That court earlier ordered an evidentiary hearing, which led to last week’s ruling.

Beaver County Common Pleas Judge Gus Kwidis wrote that the county tax claim bureau complied with notification requirements in state law before the auction. She had previously owed other taxes, but at the time of the sale she owed just $235, including other interest and fees.

“There is no doubt that (she) had actual receipt of the notification of the tax upset sale on July 7, 2011, and Aug. 16, 2011,” the judge wrote. “Moreover, on Aug. 12, 2011, a notice of sale was sent by first class mail and was not returned.”

The property sold for about $116,000, and most of that money will be paid to Battisti if further appeals are unsuccessful. An attorney for the purchaser did not return a phone message on Monday.

Joe Askar, Beaver County’s chief solicitor, said the judge got the decision right, based on the law.

“The county never wants to see anybody lose their home, but at the same time the tax sale law, the tax real estate law, doesn’t give a whole lot of room for error, either,” Askar said.

Battisti said her husband handled the paperwork for the property’s taxes before he passed away in 2004.

“It’s bad – she had some hard times, I guess her husband kind of took care of a lot of that stuff,” Askar said. “It seemed that she was having a hard time coping with the loss of her husband – that just made it set in a little more.”

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20140428_ap_19709495ce3342f6bf59be478999be5a.html#EA0Qs18pB3U1Mv8J.99

6 thoughts on “OK to sell widow’s home over $6 bill, judge rules

  1. “The county never wants to see anybody lose their home…”

    Yes they do. Especially when one of the county’s crooked politicians can have one of his friends of relatives scoop it up at a dirt-cheap price.

    “Moreover, on Aug. 12, 2011, a notice of sale was sent by first class mail and was not returned.”

    How do they know it wasn’t stolen from her mailbox? (by a crooked politician) Of even if it ever actually arrived there? “First class mail” is anything in a sealed envelope with a stamp on it. It’s NOT registered mail that has to be signed for by the recipient, so there’s no proof that this woman was even given notice. She just had her house stolen from her, and the sharks waited until her husband was dead before they moved in for the kill.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.