Alabama police issued a warning last week after two boys, ages 10 and 12, told officers they were riding their bikes when a white male inside a parked black Audi told them to get into his car about 9:20 a.m. on Scout Ridge Drive. The boys fled and the man drove off.
There in lies the problem, police think every citizen is up to no good! Our mass-media, run by SIX corporations re-affirms those fears daily!
The Hoover Police department is doing it’s part in keeping fear alive, by telling kids to run if approached by a stranger…
This is another example of what’s wrong with DHS’s everyone’s a terrorist program. American kids are being taught by teachers and police to report suspicious activity and as an added incentive they will get $100 dollars for EACH report they submit!
This story illustrates what happens when law enforcement blindly trusts kids. Yesterday, I exposed how Maryland police are using a Youth Risk Behavior Study to justify Heroin checkpoints…
The questionable (gov’t) survey CLAIMED kids voluntarily admitted to using drugs (heroin).
Would you still trust kids to tell the truth?
Back to the Hoover police, instead of interviewing the two boys at length or questioning other witnesses, Gregg sent two detectives to interview (interrogate) an innocent man!
Rector said detectives located the man and the black Audi. They interviewed him at length and do not believe there was any criminal act or malicious intentions on his part. It appears, Rector said, the man was motioning the boys to cross the street.
Rector claims sending two detectives to intimidate and interview an innocent man “was simply a misunderstanding“!
What’s become SOP for police everywhere is to question and detain anyone, police are no longer worried about our rights! They have no fear of public backlash and certainly no fear of the mass-media making it headline news. Sadly, police have no fear of getting fired or sued for detaining/ arresting innocent Americans.
http://massprivatei.blogspot.com/2015/12/police-think-waving-kids-across-street.html
Well did he tell them to get in the car, or motion them to cross the street? These are two very different actions, and it’s tough to pass off one for the other.
If his Audi was parked, he probably wasn’t telling them to cross the street (it’s something usually done by the driver of a car on the road). If he was telling them to cross the street, the kids would have recognized that, and probably would not have fled.
“They interviewed him at length and do not believe there was any criminal act or malicious intentions on his part.”
Were they expecting a confession?
I see the author’s point, and I understand his reasons for encouraging people to avoid jumping to the conclusion that someone’s behavior is suspicious, but there are plenty of sick bastards out there too, and a lot of kids vanish every year.
I’ve seen paranoid parents erroneously jump to these conclusions many times, but I’m not sure the example given here was a good one.
Once I was driving home from the bar here and two young deer were standing on the side of the road, waiting to cross. I stopped, and motioned for them to cross just as if they were two human kids, and they crossed the road when I told them to. I was amazed by this, and I wondered how in the hell they learned to obey a human telling then to cross the road. Later I realized that they probably ignored me, and decided to cross the road because my truck had stopped, but it sure was strange enough when it happened.