Renowned Author: Obama Wants Military Leaders Who Will Fire on U.S. Citizens

World Events and the Bible

WEB Notes: Yesterday we covered the firing of these generals and today in a video. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out these generals are being purged from the system and it is not because of their “crimes.” Understanding that two of the generals were in control of nuclear weapons is extremely alarming. What is it that they were told to do that they failed to go along with…

(Examiner) – On Monday, Dr. Jim Garrow, a renowned author and humanitarian who was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, sparked a firestorm of controversy when he wrote on Facebook that President Obama wants military leaders who will fire on U.S. citizens. In an exclusive interview with, Dr. Garrow said the man who told him this is a military hero who is known by everybody in the country.  

“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new ‘litmus test‘ in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks,” he wrote.

“The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not,” the unnamed military officer reportedly said. Dr. Garrow also wrote that those who do not meet this litmus test are being removed.
On Tuesday, Dr. Garrow said that officers who know about this cannot come forward without endangering themselves and facing possible retaliation from the administration.

According to Dr. Garrow, the officer who made the allegation learned about the litmus test from the person who got him interested in military service. That person, Dr. Garrow added, was forced out for failing to meet the criteria.

Dr. Garrow said he promised to keep the officer’s name from the public, adding that he stands behind what he was told regardless of the consequences.

“I would stake my full reputation on this gentleman,” he said.

“If people want to throw things at me, fine,” he added, calling it “an honor” to come under fire for keeping his promise to the officer.

Dr. Garrow told Examiner that there are people in the administration who are paid to “attack those who raise doubts” about anyone who criticizes the Obama administration.

As numerous sites have mentioned, Dr. Garrow is no conspiracy theorist or “random crackpot on Facebook.” Not only is he the author of “The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China,” he is a highly-regarded human rights activist who has rescued thousands of young girls from certain death in China and currently owns over 250 schools in that country.

Examiner’s Dave Gibson said the shocking claim comes on the heels of a Washington Free Beacon report that says Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis will leave his post as Commanding General of Central Command in March, several months earlier than anticipated.

The Free Beacon described his dismissal as a “bum’s rush.”

A post at the blog Nice Deb reminds readers that a paper issued by a West Point think tank warns of so-called “far right” groups like the “anti-federalist” movement, that supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”

According to an article at the Washington Times, the report describes “anti-federalists” as those who “espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government. Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct most their violence against the federal government and its proxies in law enforcement.”

Given today’s political climate, that definition could encompass much of the Tea Party and those who espouse conservatism. – Examiner: Renowned author: Obama wants military leaders who will fire on U.S. citizens

14 thoughts on “Renowned Author: Obama Wants Military Leaders Who Will Fire on U.S. Citizens

  1. Jim Garrow is neither a renowned author or a PhD holder. His book Pink Pagoda is full of inaccuracies and lies–I know because I worked in Beijing for 18 years as an American journalist. And his claim that he’s saved tens of thousands of Chinese infants is completely made up. His PhD was an honorable one and not for academic work. People with honorary degrees don’t refer to themselves as Dr. Furthermore, it was granted by a small southern Christian university that is now apparently defunct. Journalists who tried to confirm this were unable to do so. But don’t believe me on this. Google his name and you’ll find plenty of doubts expressed about him in his hometown in Canada and by experts on adoption in China. He has a murky background. I also find his claim about senior US military officers being forced to sign a document promising to open fire on civilians quite dubious, and an insult to our brave military leaders, who would not remain silent in the face of such nonsense. I served two tours in Vietnam with the US Army, and also served in the USMC Reserves and have some knowledge of US military leaders. They’re dedicated, brave and principled men and I’m sure more than a few would speak out if the Obama administration had tried to force them to sign a document that would hurt the American people. Don’t insulte them by making them look so unprincipled. The Air Force general who was recently forced out of office was in the field of nuclear weapons. Is Jim claiming the man refused to fire nuclear weapons on Americans? Even the most skeptical Americans should have doubts about this. I hope you’ll do some research about Jim’s background before you give him more opportunities to lie about himself and the United States. You owe this to your readers. Paul

  2. This Jim Garrow is suspicious. His claim about being nominated for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize will never be confirmed in our time:

    Due to the statutes of the Nobel Foundation, lists of nominations are held for 50 years, so the official list of the Nobel Peace Prize Nominees for 2009 will not be available until at least 2059.

    In 2009 there were 205 names submitted for the Nobel Peace Prize; 33 of them were organizations. This was the highest number of nominations in the history of the prize.

    To hell with articles that claim something astounding, from a source high up somewhere, but one that can’t be named is BS. If we wanted that kind
    of trickery, we could watch FOX or CNN.

    1. I actually don’t think Garrow has spent much time in China–his discussion of the adoption issue, and his book, show a complete ignorance about the country and the adoption process. And I fear that if he’s involved at all, that you may be right in saying he may be involved in practices that are harmful to children.

      1. Personally, i would trust no one who has been in the CIA…..Ever…
        So, forget the guy, is my opinion.
        Veteran, US Army, in country 1969, Vietnam

        There is no worse group of people than the US CIA, that has ever existed, in the entire history of all peoples….Period.

          1. The article claims this author was a spy for the CIA………thats where I picked this up……..I still stand on my statements regarding the CIA..
            I was stationed at Long Bien……..720 MP’s..BN…..for a good share of 1969 before going straight to S. Korea, at Pusan..
            rbeason US56639487…United States Army Veteran

          2. the video on this page…says Jim Garrow was a CIA Spy for 40 years…thats a second article about the man……a bit earlier than this article…I should have mentioned they were not the same writing….

  3. Well, putting this Garrow guy aside…. let’s not get distracted from the fact that Miss Barry has been getting rid of a whole lot of high up officers since he has been in. Kind of like most dictators do when coming to power

    1. it’s been reported with footnotes…..that Obummer was CIA…when he went to Afghanistan while in college……..
      I am not saying this author might or might not be correct…….just don’t trust anybody CIA………ever……..
      what ever any of them have to say, there are better ways to dig out the truth than to go with what……anyone of them says………Always……..

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.