TSA administrator says domestic surveillance program “makes an awful lot of sense”

You know what else would make an awful lot of sense? Killing traitor feds while they are at home in bed, before they can do more damage to the Bill of Rights.

I guess I will have to assume the feds will honor the oath they take to the constitution, and they will have to assume I won’t burn their damn houses down around their ears and shoot anybody that tries to run out…

CBS News

TSA Administrator David Pekoske said a surveillance program known as “Quiet Skies,” which has been criticized for tracking American citizens not suspected of any crimes, “makes an awful lot of sense.”  

“Our job overall as an agency, and the air marshals in particular, in flight, are working to make sure that we mitigate any risks that could occur in aircraft at 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 feet,” Pekoske told CBS News in his first TV interview since the “Quiet Skies” program was disclosed to the public. “If an agency responsible for security has some information that might indicate that there may be — emphasis on may be — more risk with a particular passenger, providing some mitigation or some risk management on the flight is a very important and very reassuring thing to me.”

“Quiet Skies,” first reported by The Boston Globe, dates back to 2011. It uses computer software to flag travelers, including U.S. citizens, who could pose a threat but may not have been accused of a crime and are not on the No Fly List.

In March, the program expanded to include assigning teams of air marshals to observe certain flyers’ behavior while at airports and on flights.

Now, TSA has eyes on up to 50 flyers a day on domestic carriers nationwide under the program, according to leaked documents and sources who spoke to CBS News.

The program targets specific travel patterns, affiliations or some specific links to people who are on watch lists. Agents observing a “Quiet Skies” flier note behavior such as “excessive fidgeting,” “excessive perspiration” or having a “cold, penetrating stare,” according to leaked documents.

A flyer who has been flagged under the program receives enhanced screening at airport checkpoints and is on the “Quiet Skies” list for up to 90 days.

Many skeptics of the program, including some rank-and-file air marshals, have questioned whether a person who is being followed by two or three federal agents on a domestic flight should be flying at all.

“Throughout the entire system … different passengers present different levels of risk,” Pekoske said. “Passengers have a right to fly and if we ever thought the risk reached the point where the passenger shouldn’t fly, then we have the authority to deny flight for that particular passenger.”

“But as you can appreciate, there are some passengers that fall below that threshold but still create a level of concern that we need — we felt we needed to have a presence on the flights that they were flying on,” he said.

Since the program’s public disclosure last month, the TSA has faced criticism from several Democratic members of Congress.

“The ‘Quiet Skies’ program is the very definition of ‘Big Brother,’ and innocent Americans should not be subject to this kind of violation of their rights,” said Sen. Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts, who sent a letter to TSA about the program. “This program raises serious privacy concerns, and depending on what criteria are being used for selecting individuals to surveil, including ethnicity, nationality, race, or religion, the program may be unconstitutional. We need answers about this questionable program, including if it actually resulted in arrests or prevented terrible events.”

Late last month, the TSA said in a statement to CBS News the program’s primary purpose is to “ensure passengers and flight crew are protected during air travel,” adding that it doesn’t take race and religion into account and “is not intended to surveil ordinary Americans.”

“With routine reviews and active management via legal, privacy and civil rights and liberties offices, it is a practical method of keeping another act of terrorism from occurring at 30,000 feet,” the statement said.

Officials familiar with the program said it complies with security constraints and privacy requirements.

“In my view, in looking at this ‘Quiet Skies’ program, I think it makes an awful lot of sense, to be able to look at some risks that we think exist on certain flights and put air marshals on those flights,” Pekoske said.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tsa-administrator-david-pekoske-says-quiet-skies-domestic-surveillance-program-makes-an-awful-lot-of-sense/

6 thoughts on “TSA administrator says domestic surveillance program “makes an awful lot of sense”

  1. David. ..

    Ughh….there’s a word for people like u.

    And an unspoken word.

    And it’s. ..

    “Fk U”…

    This person needs to be fired…

    Beat…

    Crucified.

    Burned at the stake.

    Drawn and quartered.

    Ground up and fed to the North Koreans.

    While Dennis Rodman shoots 3 pointers with Lil Kim in his private…NBA playoff b ball court.

    If there ever was a treasonous btch …

    I would have to nominate this azxhole in yhe hall of shame.

    I would suggest. ..

    That his wife or fag friend…

    Cut off hiz or her bawlz so he can’t contaminate the rest of the fkng world with viruses called ….

    “OffSpring”.

    Yeah…we’re just bacteria and viruses trying to find consciousness in a cesspool infected by mind parasites.

    Pimps…
    Insurance agents.
    Shitty Jobs.
    Motivation. ..though threat of penalty…
    That would be current free for all law today.

    UR on Your own….

    Jesus ain’t coming to save you.

    Just like Al Sharpton…

    Or Casper the friendly ghost.

    You have to save yourself.

  2. “is not intended to surveil ordinary Americans.”

    In theory only.

    Whenever they use the words ‘not intended’, the opposite is automatically inferred.

  3. “You know what else would make an awful lot of sense? Killing traitor feds while they are at home in bed, before they can do more damage to the Bill of Rights.

    I guess I will have to assume the feds will honor the oath they take to the constitution, and they will have to assume I won’t burn their damn houses down around their ears and shoot anybody that tries to run out…”

    I have been telling people this for many years now and this includes ALL those who choose a life of government employment no matter the type federal, state, local city or town. I recently was talking to someone on a train in nyc and made it a point to raise my voice so others could hear what it was we were talking about. The conversation was about this exact subject EotS posted. Some people looked in horror others were intrigued and I told them directly you better get ready because its going to get very ugly more so in places like this where you are restricted in being able to defend yourself.
    Some realized others had no clue as to what would happen in a place like nyc.

    The tunnels will be guarded for a time but the way to crawl away will be destroyed less the very northern route in the BX. Why do you think the tunnels are where these full on facial recognition and plate scanners have been placed already with plans of expansion?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HN7L4DcBlOU

    I also have noticed each lane over different bridges have HD cameras pointing at the cars windshield already ahead of this so called FR/PS tech implementation they are small but are there and get the person or people up front.

    Do you think these so called traffic cameras are for the good of the people heading off to work so they can see what the traffic is like? Guess what I have this great bridge from Brooklyn into lower Manhattan that’s for sale and its brick and steel great piece of property you could charge admission and make your money back in no time.

    On I10 near the TX/NM border East bound there is a border patrol check point, prior to this they have rows of cameras to profile the driver/passengers along with the plate(state to far check/stop let he dog hit on the smell of gasoline false hit search the vehicle).

    If people think the movie the postman is a pretext of what might happen they are sadly mistaken because by that time people would have figured out when they say “WE are from the government and WE here to help” someone shoots them in the face.

    Age restriction removed via this link.
    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=shot+in+the+face&t=hi&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=5qjpLCtVdw0

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*