Drones in the US, and the people who fly them, must be registered on a government database starting from 21 December.
Any drones purchased from that date onwards must be logged before the first outdoor flight, the country’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has said.
Existing drone owners have until 19 February 2016 to register their drones, but a $5 (£3.30) fee will be waived to encourage registration within the first 30 days.
FAA spokesman Les Dorr told the BBC that it would seek to educate, rather than punish, those found to have no registered their drones.
But he added: “For people who simply refuse to register, we do have enforcement tools available.”
Those punishments could be civil penalties of up to $27,500, but in severe cases, criminal prosecutions could result in a $250,000 fine and a maximum of three years in prison.
The rule affects drones weighing in at half a pound to 55lb (228g to 22.7kg). Users older than 13 must register themselves, but parents can register on behalf of younger children.
Each drone will be given a unique identification number to be displayed on the device.
‘Great responsibility’
On Monday, the FAA promised the process would be “streamlined and user-friendly”.
“Make no mistake: unmanned aircraft enthusiast are aviators and with that title comes a great deal of responsibility,” US transportation secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement.
“Registration gives us an opportunity to work with these users to operate their unmanned aircraft safely.
“I’m excited to welcome these new aviators into the culture of safety and responsibility that defines American innovation.”
In depth: Drone discipline
Hobby drones. Unmanned aerial vehicles. Remote-controlled copters.
Call them what you will, they’re becoming a nuisance.
A minority of irresponsible users has been flying them too close to aeroplanes and helicopters, wandering into restricted military airspace, spying on neighbours; disrupting sporting events and even injuring people.
It was only a matter of time before some trigger-happy vigilante shot one of the pesky privacy invaders out of the sky.
Regulators and law enforcers are struggling to cope with the growth in their popularity, increasing the likelihood that heavy-handed legislation could stifle innovation in a sector that has great commercial potential for businesses large and small.
Read more: Can technology keep our skies safe from nuisance drones?
Regulators had been under pressure to clamp down on what many people, particularly those in the emergency services, consider to be a growing menace – hobbyist drone users flying in unwanted places.
Firefighters in California said drones had disrupted efforts to contain wildfires.
‘Stupidity’
However, some believe the drone database will be ineffective.
“The fact is that for the most part, when there are sightings, they don’t actually get to recover the drone itself,” Mickey Osterreicher, from the National Press Photographers’ Association, told BBC News when consultations began in October.
“So, what would registering the drone accomplish?”
He added that further rules would not prevent bad drone use, drawing comparisons to people who drive cars without a licence or insurance, saying: “You really can’t legislate against stupidity.”
But other bodies, including the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI), have backed the idea and taken an active role in consultations.
The regulations fall some way short of calls to make it legal for emergency services to forcibly disable drones by using electronic jamming.
Follow Dave Lee on Twitter @DaveLeeBBC
these arnt drones, they are quad copters
again twisting terminology for their own purposes , and no one calling them on it
also note : for the stupid
these 1/2 pound to even a 10 pound Quad-Copter is of no threat to aviation ,even in the form of a small private aircraft or helicopter
these toys would be blasted into tiny bits if struck by most any aircraft certified to fly these days … but we have to make it sound scary like these would bring down a 747 or something like that
the stupidity burns
I think this all comes down to them not wanting to be watched by us , so if we register them , it will deter some from even buying them , and those that do it will deter them from using them in a patriotic way due to the possibility of being tracked back to the user
and as far as unlawful use or trespassing with the device,, we free people still own shot guns , give us the right to shoot the dam things down if we feel violated
BAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ROLMFAO!!!
Hobbyists registering drones…. What will they think of next? Registering your toy radio controlled plane, boat, car or helicopter? How about that wind up doll?
Unfrigginbelievable…….
“I’m excited to welcome these new aviators into the culture of safety and responsibility that defines American innovation.” – Love it
I have/had many rc airplanes and helicopters. I am controlling them. I have limits to range and locations.
What makes these different?
Do I need to come suck a masons ass so I can fly my rc planes?
Or is this for “drones” that fly with autonomous cpu control?
Or is it just if it has 4 props?
OR What if I strap a gopro to a goose? What then?
My answer is… does some enforcer want to catch lead to see my receipt?
Get a life. eat a gun.
What about toy trains? A terrorist could lay tracks right to your front door at night. Next thing you know…..chugga chugga chugga right to your front door and,,,,, BOOOOOOM! Something has to be done!
When our founding fathers had toy hoops and dolls they imagined electric toys of mass destruction. I am for sensible toy train laws.