When Drills Go Live: How to recognize the signs of False Flag Terrorism (Operations)

KWA, April 4, 2012

What is a False Flag Operation?

A false flag operation is any procedure, which is carried out by one organization, but designed to appear as though it was orchestrated by another entity. The term “false flag” comes from the days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag of its enemy and then attack a ship in its own fleet. These operations often precede war and are sometimes employed to provoke enemy retaliation. They occur in the context of war, terrorism, politics, the corporate world, and religious ideology.  

False Flag Operations are a type of Black Operations, which are covert operations not attributable to the organization carrying them out. These “top secret” operations are conducted by special forces such as the U.S. Navy SEALS, Delta Force, CIA, DEA, government agencies, etc. Most Black Operations in the U.S. are executed through the Pentagon. Some by a Military Industrial Complex Co-Op where the Pentagon works jointly with a private multinational company or institution in which both sides have something to gain. Black Operations examples include: assassinations, industrial espionage, force reconnaissance, Psy-Ops, abductions, Drug Trafficking, False Flag Operations, etc.

False Flag Terrorism Operations Are Patterned on the Hegelian Dialectic

German philosopher, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel claimed that each stage of human advancement was driven by an argument (thesis), a counterargument (anti-thesis) and finally a synthesis of the two into a more advanced argument – at which point the process restarts.
Today, the Hegelian Dialectic is a method with which the propagandists manipulate a targeted population by fear. Using a three-stage formula, Problem-Reaction-Solution (based on Hegelian Dialectic), an artificial problem is created that enrages the public (the “Problem”). The public then demands “something be done” (the “Reaction”). Finally, a pre-planned solution is offered (the “Solution”)—which never would have been accepted had the artificial problem not existed. Because the public has been traumatized and placed under a state of fear by the “problem”, they agree to almost anything to alleviate it. And the solution (agenda) is advanced forward.

Top 9 Signs of a False Flag Terrorism Operation

1. 1. The terror incident or attack follows the Hegelian Dialectic model (a.k.a. Problem-Reaction-Solution). An example in the U.S. today would be the use of the 9/11 “terrorist attacks” as the “problem” that “demanded” a “solution” which resulted in the USA Patriot Act (overriding many freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution) that never would have been passed had the “problem” not existed.
2. 2. The mainstream media hypes up the possibility of a terrorist attack weeks or months before the event.
3. 3. Following the incident, news media endlessly covers the most traumatic moments of the incident, ad nauseum to traumatize the public.
4. 4. Terror or public safety drills are conducted prior to and during the false-flag event. This draws manpower away from response readiness for the real attack and causes confusion. It also allows the opportunity for the drill to GO LIVE at the last moment.
5. 5. Eyewitness reports vary greatly from the propagated version of what really took place during the incident. Witnesses who contradict (especially with visual or audio evidence [which is quickly confiscated]) the official story are subjected to logical fallacies such as character assassination.
6. 6. The first two hours of “live” news broadcasts following the incident, due to limited censoring, provides the most telling evidence. In the moments after 9/11, the news reported a “series of bomb explosions.” But, as time lapsed, condemning witness testimony was replaced by the official story.
7. 7. Counterfeit evidence suddenly appears in support of the official story to enhance the story’s believability. An example of this would be the alleged hijacker visa that survived the 9/11 plane crash.
8. 8. All official investigations conducted only consider evidence that supports the official story and everything that proves the contrary is ignored. William Rodriguez (a WTC janitor who was in the basement of the North Tower on 9/11), recounted to CNN what happened before the plane hit the tower, “..we hear like a big rumble. Not like an impact, like a rumble, like moving furniture in a massive way. And all of sudden we hear another rumble, and a guy comes running, running into our office, and all of skin was off his body.” The 9/11 Commission ignored this testimony, because it conflicted with the official story.
9. 9. Any identified “terrorists” are later revealed to have intimate ties with the CIA, MI5, MI6, Mossad, ISI, or another government agency.

 

“… I am NOT talking about a conspiracy; I am talking about an agenda! The implementation of this agenda has three parts. First, conspiring to remove those people and organizations that are a threat to the agenda becoming reality. Second, conspiring to place into power, those who will make the agenda a reality. Third, conspiring to create events in the world, like wars and Oklahoma City, to manipulate the population through Problem-Reaction-Solution to DEMAND the agenda becomes reality, or see it as the ONLY solution to the problems they are faced with.”
— David Icke; Ruled By The Gods; March 25, 2000 (Part 5 – 30:14 to 31:00).

Examples of False Flag Terrorist Operations

Operation Northwoods

Approved by the Pentagon, Operation Northwoods proposed fabricating terrorism in US cities and killing innocent citizens to manipulate the public into supporting a war against Cuba in the early 1960s. This plan included blowing up a US ship and hijacking planes to gain support for war.

Excerpt from the Joint Chiefs report (declassified from “Top Secret” to “Unclassified” in 2000):
(click here to view the actual Joint Chiefs document – pdf)

Page 138-139 of file (page 7-8 of actual Joint Chiefs report)

2. A series of well-coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.

A. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):
(1) Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
(2) Land friendly Cubans in uniform “over-the-fence” to stage attack on base.
(3) Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
(4) Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).
(5) Blow up ammunition inside the base: start fires.
(6) Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
(7) Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
(8) Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
(9) Capture militia group which storms base.
(10) Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires – naphthalene.
(11) Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be lieu of (10)).

3. A “Remember the Maine” incident could be arranged in several forms:
a. We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba. b. […] Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.

4. We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.

9/11

On September 11, 2001, two planes crashed into the Twin Towers in New York City, a third plane crashed into the Pentagon and a fourth crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. The official story is that all these planes were commercial aircraft carrying passengers and their jet fuel promoted fires that caused three buildings to collapse (Building 7 collapsed, but was not struck by a plane).
It is interesting to note that the site of the collapsed towers has ever since been referred to as “Ground Zero,” which is defined as; “The point on the earth’s surface directly above or below an exploding nuclear bomb.” This would corroborate the many eyewitness testimonies of hearing “explosions” before and during the “attacks.” As well as explain how 200,000 tons of steel melted into a molten puddle.

Some of the many “drills” being conducted before and during the events of 9/11:

2000-2001: The military conducted exercises simulating hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets causing mass casualties. One target was the World Trade Center (WTC), another the Pentagon. [USA Today, 4/19/04, Military District of Washington, 11/3/00]

Sept 11, 2001: A US intelligence agency was scheduled for an exercise on Sept 11 at 9 AM in which an aircraft would crash into one of its buildings near Washington, DC. [USA Today/AP, 8/22/02]

Northern Vigilance – a NORAD operation that deployed fighter aircraft to locations in Alaska and Northern Canada.

Vigilant Guardian – A semi-annual Command Post Exercise (CPX), was conducted in offices and with computers, but without actual planes in the air. One of the scenarios being run on September 11, 2001, was a “traditional” simulated hijacking. According to General Eberhart, after the first attack, “it took about 30 seconds” to make the adjustment to the real-world situation.

Remember, if the evidence supports the official story, the public is endlessly bombarded with the propaganda. If it doesn’t, the evidence is determined to be damaged, lost, destroyed, accidentally erased, or withheld “for reasons of national security.”

For example: The 9/11 attack on the Pentagon was filmed by myriad surveillance cameras in the area; and to this date, very limited “alleged” footage of the attack has been released to the public.

False Flag Operations: A History Lesson

http://www.kwa.us/blog/?p=137