Why Is The Postal Service Purchasing Ammo And Guns?


Published on Feb 12, 2014 by Ben Swann

What is the story behind all these federal agencies that keep attempting to purchase small arms and ammo?
We’ve told you about these issues before… with DHS making huge purchase orders for ammo but this latest one is coming from the U.S. Postal Service
On January 31 of this year the USPS posted a solicitation to purchase “assorted small arms ammuntion” on the federal government’s federal business opportunities website (FBO.gov). The solicitation is structured to begin a bidding process for the purchase of guns and ammunition.
Why is the US postal service soliciting orders for small arms ammo? Is this not a fiscal sanity issue?

10 thoughts on “Why Is The Postal Service Purchasing Ammo And Guns?

  1. Why do they need guns and ammo, because the economy is going down and they might be easy targets in the future. One mail truck could deliver several credit cards and cash in b-day cards, either that or the fed just wants more guns and ammo available for DHS and this way the postal service can just hold onto a reserve stock for them.

  2. Ben Swan is a government-paid shill and his goal here is to turn this into a financial issue rather than one of tyranny. His claim that “there’s no proof” that federal agencies are gearing up for civil unrest is a subtle attempt to push large-scale ammo purchases into the realm of “conspiracy theory” myths.

    What could federal agencies like NOAA, IRS, and the Postal Service possibly be doing with billions of rounds of ammo if they weren’t gearing up for civil unrest? The proof he claims doesn’t exist is in the purchases themselves. Or do we have to wait until they start shooting civilians to figure that out?

    They’re trying to conceal their ammo acquisitions by spreading them out over different agencies, but do you think there would be any resistance if someone from DHS picked up the ammo sold to the Postal service?

    NO. They’re all federal agencies, and they’re stockpiling ammo to shoot American citizens, and if Ben Swan says otherwise, it’s proof that he’s a lying sack of dung.

    Don’t believe anyone who wears a suit and tie. He’s a salesman and what he’s trying to sell you here is a false hope that they’re NOT gearing up to kill many millions of us.

    1. Thank you, Jolly Roger for your post. As I was watching the video I was asking myself if this fellow could be a shill, and I felt in my spirit that he probably is.

      It helps me to know who to listen to and who to ignore.

      Your input was a help to me.

    2. Thanks JR for the heads up on this ben swan guy. After I posted it I remembered something about this guy that was a little off color but wasn`t quite sure what it was.Now I know. Thanks again JR

    3. Maybe the PO wants to add meaning to the phrase going postal? Does this mean my letter carrier will or can carry a AR with or with out a license?

  3. Might we be seeing different factions within the government arming to fight other factions, i.e. each other? DHS against the military, or portions there of?

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*