Activist Post – by Brandon Turbeville
As France finds itself in the grips of martial law and its first mandatory curfew since it was occupied by the Nazis in 1944, there exists a number of questionable details surrounding the recent terrorist attacks in Paris.
Only hours after the first shots were fired, stories and reports are beginning to change and contradict one another. Considering the history of the French government, French Intelligence agencies and the Anglo-American/NATO Intelligence apparatus, particularly the recent events surrounding the Charlie Hebdo attacks that were exposed as false flags, one would be justified in wondering whether or not these recent attacks in Paris were of the same variety.
Below are a number of reasons to question the official story of the Paris terror attacks.
1.) How many gunmen? Already, the number of individuals involved in the Paris attacks is in question. While some reports suggested four shooters were involved, others suggested three. The majority of mainstream reports seem to be only acknowledging two shooters. So how many shooters were there? Two, three or four? One witness, Pierre Marie Bertin, a 36-year-old who was at the theater when the shooting began, stated that there were as many as four gunmen. Bertin described some male hostages who “went onto the balcony and tried to negotiate for the life of their wives with one of the guys [terrorists]. It was sickening.” Bertin recounted somewhat more detail than some other witnesses and was clear that there were as many as four gunmen. Australian news media is reporting that three gunmen have been killed.
This might seem inconsequential to many readers, but in informed researching circles it is well-known that the information that comes out shortly after the event is usually the most reliable. This is not to discount the existence of confusion related to panicked reports coming from eyewitnesses and the like. However, the information coming out early on has not yet been subjected to the top-down media revision that will inevitably take place as the story becomes molded to fit the narrative pushed by the individuals who either directed the attack at the higher levels or at least have connections with those who are able to control the manner in which various media outlets report the event. For instance, in times of false flag attacks, the initial reports may point to 5 gunmen. Very shortly after, reports may only mention two. Only a few hours after the attack, however, all references to more than one gunmen are removed entirely, with only the “lone gunman” story remaining. Any other mention of additional gunmen after this point is ridiculed as “conspiracy theory.”
2.) The types of weapons used – While some reports suggest that the attackers were using AK-47s, other reports are suggesting that shotguns were used. While the contradiction in reports can certainly be attributed to victims and witnesses simply not being aware of the type of weapons being used in the attacks and panic in the heat of the moment, there is none the less contradiction in the reports being issued. As of the time of the writing of this article there has been no clarification as to what type of weapons were used. Since the assailants were supposedly killed by police it should be clear what weapons they used.
3.) Were the gunmen killed or arrested? While the number of gunmen itself is in doubt, news reports coming from Fox and Sky are suggesting that a suspected gunmen was actually arrested. In fact, the suspect allegedly stated to police, “I am from ISIS” giving us all the information we need as for who is responsible for this attack.
Suspect arrested at #Paris concert hall told Police: "I am from ISIS." @ShepNewsTeam https://t.co/Xf7nZwC0JU pic.twitter.com/RTgiqRWtY5
— Fox News (@FoxNews) November 13, 2015
4.) Gunmen connected to ISIS, gunmen connected to Syria – Along with the very convenient and immediate statement by an allegedly arrested suspect that he was from ISIS, we also have screams of a shooter that “This is for Syria!” This gives us all the information that we need regarding the motivation of the alleged attackers. They are from ISIS. They hate the French because the French are “attacking” ISIS and because somewhere in France in a very darkened corner, under the sofa, there are freedoms. ISIS hates freedoms. This is quite coincidental considering the fact that a Russian airliner was recently bombed, allegedly by ISIS – at least according to the West.
5.) The timing of the event – Aside from the obvious connotations derived from the attacks occurring on Friday the 13th, the Paris massacre has taken place shortly before a major climate summit that was set to take place in France. The French government was expecting massive protests they alleged could potentially become violent, by activists opposed to globalization and energy austerity. Interestingly enough, France had already planned to impose border controls starting on November 30th in anticipation of the U.N. Conference on Climate Change in Paris “because of the terrorist threat or risk of public disorder.” Needless to say, there will be no massive protest now considering the fact that 2015 France resembles the 1943 version of itself more than anything else.
6.) Security – Considering the fact that the security had been so heightened both on the heels of the Charlie Hebdo attacks and the anticipation of disorder for the U.N. Conference on Climate Change, how on earth did such a major terror attack slip through the hands of the DGSE? After all, France is nothing if not a police state. It is also giving the United States a run for its money in the contest for how much information it is able to nab up on its citizens. No doubt, we will be sold the line of “pre-civilized savages outsmarted first-world high end military surveillance states.”
7.) Drills – One hallmark of the false flag operation is the running of drills shortly before or during the actual attack. Many times, these drills will involve the actual sequence of events that takes place during the real life attack . These drills have been present on large scale false flags such as 9/11 as well as smaller scale attacks like the Aurora shooting.
For instance, as Webster Tarpley documents in his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made In USA, at least 46 drills were underway in the months leading up to 9/11 and on the morning of the attack. These 46 drills were all directly related to the events which took place on 9/11 in some way or other. Likewise, the 7/7 bombings in London were running drills of exactly the same scenario that was occurring at exactly the same times and locations.
Although one reason may take precedence over the other depending on the nature and purpose of the operation drills are used by false flag operators for at least two reasons. One such purpose is the creation of intentional confusion if the drill is taking place during the actual attack. The other, more effective aspect, however, is using the drill as a cloak to plan the attack or even “go live” when it comes time to launch the event. Even more so, it gives the individuals who are involved in the planning of the event an element of cover, especially with the military/intelligence agency’s tight chain of command structure and need-to-know basis. If a loyal military officer or intelligence agent stumbles upon the planning of the attack, that individual can always be told that what he has witnessed is nothing more than the planning of a training exercise. This deniability continues all the way through to the actual “going live” of the drill. After the completion of the false flag attack, Coincidence Theory is used to explain away the tragic results.
All of this must be considered, when one reads reports suggesting that the UK conducted counter-terrorism drills earlier this year that included scenarios that involved terror attacks in Paris similar to those that took place on the Charlie Hebdo massacre. As the reports surrounding the UK drills were released, a number 10 spokesman confirmed “it had been agreed that future exercises, which take place on a regular basis, should seek to learn from events in France.” David Cameron himself stated that there was a need for police “to call on military help if there was a major emergency.”
8.) Charlie Hebdo – The recent Paris attacks were similar to the Charlie Hebdo massacre that occurred earlier this year. The Charlie Hebdo attacks, however, were largely revealed as a false flag operation. Evidence for which can be seen in my article “15 Signs the Charlie Hebdo Attack Was a False Flag.” Thus, there exists a clear precedent for such attacks in France, albeit on a much larger scale.
9.) Who controls ISIS? For many, claims that the attackers belong to ISIS is a deal breaker. For these individuals, ISIS is a shadowy terrorist organization that supports itself and has created a caliphate in eastern Syria and western Iraq that can scarcely be defeated (except when the Russians bomb it). However, the facts do not support such a shallow understanding of the ISIS terrorist organization. ISIS was entirely created, funded and directed by the United States, Britain, France and other NATO countries. Its actions have been coordinated by the Anglo-American Intelligence apparatus for geopolitical purposes all across the world both at home and abroad. For this reason, the declaration that ISIS committed a terrorist attack in Paris is by no means a get-out-of-jail-free card for the Western Intelligence apparatus. Instead, it is the trademark of their handiwork. Please see these articles for more information on the nature of ISIS: here, here, here and here.
While the information presented above may not be enough evidence to conclude that the Paris attacks were false flag attacks, it is reason enough to question the official story thus far. If these attacks are indeed placed in the lap of ISIS, however, all fingers should immediately point to NATO and the Atlanticist Intelligence apparatus. It is they who control ISIS and they who bear the responsibility for its actions.
Brandon Turbeville – article archive here – is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions andDispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST atUCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.
26 thoughts on “9 Reasons To Question The Paris Terror Attacks”
I agree that there are many reasons to question these “terror attacks.” I don’t know whether there were some or many that were wounded and killed, but what I’ve seen so far in pictures tells me this was a multi-location drill. There is a remarkable lack of civilian video and pictorial documentation of the “carnage,” and a remarkable lack of blood flow and spatter on floors and walls where shooting allegedly occurred. A snap of one of the “bullet wounds” looked more like theatrical makeup than an actual penetrating wound on a limb that was amazingly clean and without blood smears, among many other discrepancies. Sandy Hoax redux, JMO.
hoax, I agree, at least based on the “horror” revealed in pics.
Mirrored your comment Enbe. Sorry. You said it better anyway. More bs with this so far.
excellent article……….In my humble opinion this is connected to the upcoming ‘Climate Change Summit’ to be held in Paris. I think this event in Paris is being used as a warning to the attendees of the Summit…….sign or else………
I think you may be correct, mary. I just sent an article in covering that very aspect.
The simple fact of the lack of independent videos from what SHOULD have been literally THOUSANDS of witnesses is enough to trash the credibility of this actually having been a true terrorist attack.
#1, in agreement. Europe’s trying to “clamp down” on independent reporting so no linking of websites. How desperate can they get. Ooooh, a whole bunch more. That is strange about no other videos in this day and age. Did they EMF all the electronic devices at the venue, confiscate, I don’t know. It does beg the question, WTF?
good read #1. Thanks for posting.
This makes perfect sense to me, Paul.
Fits all too well.
A European Sand Hook.
Sandy Hoax, where no one died.
All roads lead to the Axis of Evil; The US/UK/Israel
Steven Spielberg has outdone himself again. These Hollywood dramas are becoming epic in proportion.Next we will see Godzilla holding an AK-47 with the gun belt hanging out of its mouth.
I questioned the attacks as soon as I heard about them, because people don’t do this kind of stuff. Governments and their intelligence agencies do.
They’re ALL false-flags (or “psy-ops”).
I don’t need the details. The MOSSAD/CIA did it. They always do.
Qui bono? The NWO. That’s who bonos.
What would any freedom fighter gain from this? Absolutely nothing.
agree………we’ll know when the freedom fighters strike……the UN will be demolished
Remember the false flag/ psyop objective is muddy the waters and keep the left vs right, good guys vs bad guys paradigm in play. There is however nothing false about this being an attack. The attack is upon all of humanity by the beast to turn brother against brother and ultimately to turn us upon ourselves so that we loose the capacity to see good from evil. In so we will do the beasts bidding ourselves. Be vigilant, use discernment, for the battle has been engaged .
When was the last time we saw “terrorists” make this many kills without so much as a hitch? It appears they go from not being able to hit anything which is the norm in the 3rd world to crack shots. Good gods almighty if we assume the 60-100 dead is true these running gunman are some Grade A+ bad-asses with those guns.
All The Worlds A Stage
i say that all the time
Ever notice that no dignitary ever gets killed in these attacks? It is always members of the unwashed masses. That agreement was probably hammered out when Comey met with his French and Israeli counterparts before the attack. Take a look at the history of the war on terror. Back when the bombing in Mali took place, the U.S., under Bush, was trying to align allies. It is my belief that the PM of Australia, would not allow a bombing inside Australia, so Mali was chosen. Remember Michael Meiring? He’s the brilliant fellow who blew his own legs off in a Manila hotel room while making a bomb. U.S. relations with the Philippines wasn’t good at the time. The U.S. wanted a presence in the Philippines to fight Abu Sayef. I believe Meiring was sent there to cause a terror attack in Manila, to effect/change Philippine policy. After he blew his legs off making the bomb for the terror attack, he was spirited out of the Philippines by the FBI. It’s all in the public domain, so a little research will open your eyes too.
~ DID ANYONE ELSE NOTICE that even on the very evening of Nov. 13th, there were commentators on the News shows saying that [paraphrasing] “A main problem with Government authorities trying to thwart attacks like his one, is the ENCRYPTION TECHNOLOGIES used by the ‘terrorists’ to plan and organize their attacks”. Well folks -, just watch as the NWO governments use these “Friday the 13th”-attacks as justification in their campaign to force all encryption manufacturers to provide a “software ‘backdoor’ ” for their products to the NWO governments.
… and, of course -, that is just “the tip of the iceberg” as to how these attacks will be “conveniently” used by those governments.
My belief is that this had more to do with the fact that France wanted to side with Russia on the whole war thing and this is elite’s way of getting back at them. I think this Climate Change stuff was only part of it.
And the fact that ISIS claimed the attack, well..that’s says it all as for who did it. The US, Britain and Israel created ISIS, so therefore they are the ones that did it.
“1.) How many gunmen? Already, the number of individuals involved in the Paris attacks is in question. While some reports suggested four shooters were involved, others suggested three. The majority of mainstream reports seem to be only acknowledging two shooters. So how many shooters were there? Two, three or four?”
Well…..let’s see from another posted article:
“21:49 Four gunmen storm the Bataclan theatre, using grenades and assault rifles. The men took more than 100 hostages and started to murder them one by one. At least 80 deaths have been confirmed, with many more injuries.
00:20 Police storm the Batalcan in the hope of stopping the hostage massacre. Seven gunmen blow themselves up with suicide vests, an eighth was killed by police.”
Guess that would make it 11 – 12 gunmen. Where they are getting only 2 – 4 gunmen is beyond me. And that’s just ONE area.
The MSM must be going for that “LONE WOLF” attack story in multiple areas.
Gee…they must be superhuman terrorists to kill that many people, blow themselves up and then come back alive to get arrested as patsies. Amazing!
Either that or those 11- 12 don’t count as they are already dead.
Kinda like those people who don’t count as being unemployed because they aren’t in the workforce thing, so the number shrinks to only 1 or 2 unemployed.
You know, Commie speak. 😉
9? I can give you 7000!
Anyone see all of the pictures of the victsims (yeah VICTSIM) already up? These are very personal pictures. That means, the few hours’ dead corpses, had family “Rush” mind you, to find a personal touching photo of their dead family member or friend and send it somewhere? BEFORE THE BODY WAS IDENTIFIED. Less than 24 hours BTW.
Let’s see, Puty checks the Neozionists in Syrian airspace, France out of no where declares their going into Syria and sending their rust bucket surrender monkey aircraft carrier to the gulf all because we just abandoned it after 20 straight years of presence (Russian Missiles and A2/Ad area denial technology). We know they won’t fire on the pussy french (lower case), so we get the fags in Paris involved to cover that area and to use them as a surrogate on the ground in W. Syria, and for the Golan where Cheney, Evelyn Roth shit child, Blair, Rumsfeld, Nutnyahoo and a bunch of criminals all invest in a massive newly found oil field on someone else’s land by the way. How do you think that’s going to end? Just try and beat those c***suckers in court….
All the while the ziopigs flood WHITE ONLY countries with pure filth, goat herding, dangerous maggots to make the Euro’s hate Muslims even more because they need the idiots to hate Muslims enough to finally go to war ALL over the middle east and secure all the pipelines that are to go through Syria to Turkey and the Med, from Qatar and Bahrain.
Before this of course, that fake jew khazarian nutjob asks for and gets 50 billion from the US so that they can prepare for said war. Yeah, 50 is much more than 3.5. The US can’t do it, so make the french ante up and secure peripheral strategic land based areas to further bolster the fleeing assets “Al Ciada” before the Russians finally reach the Golan Heights and crush the Israeli assets and the rest of the CIA “jews” running the show from there.
Now you know why the french cosied up to Putin immediately after he started sorties. That was the CIA begging.
Just like Sadam wishes he could have said a few things more before the second invasion. Like, “I decided to trade oil in Euro’s. I’m sure Qaddafi would like a lectern too. If Putin doesn’t start the end game which is the truth, we’re all fucked. If the FSB is as good as I’m told, those dead assets in Paris were followed and identified with their GDSE and CIA handlers very recently. Time to call them out Putin, same with Assad. Just once, can you say why you’re really going through this? PIPELINES. Without those pipelines Qatar is no longer a Gulf power, which is why Yemen is being bombed. If Yemen is stable they can put the Gulf Cooperation out of business (Massive port system). From Qatar, Turkey stays the 4th largest gas mover on the earth. If Turkey doesn’t get those lines, they’re Kurd toast in 10 years. All of these things, all of them also checkmate Russian oil and gas. They will go to war over this I assure you.
The second you hear about a Russian plane going down over the Golan, start buying MRE’s and iodine tablets. I wish I was kidding……
So why do I think this attack in Paris is fake? Because it solves about 7000 problems in 2 hours. I’ll skip the 7000 thousand articles that don’t touch on any of the real reasons why this is all happening.
“Oh the heads of all of these intelligence outfits all met in Paris recently?” Yeah, no shit!? Give me a break.
I know every gun guy in Colorado (Class 3 included), Seals, Rangers, Para’s, Sherrifs even a few ex-Legionaires. How many times could I have gotten my hands on a real automatic AK-47(74) in my lifetime, illegally? ONCE. So they send in the fake uncorroborated story of an armory being broken into which is why they knew to expect something…….you have to be mentally retarded to believe any of this shite.
And oh yes, Jews just sold that music venue a few months ago after owning it for decades, NOW THAT I DO BELIEVE.