America’s Ebola Victim Is A Fake

Help Free the Earth

Want proof that the whole Ebola scare is fake and so is the victim?

The name of the second American stricken with Ebola is Nancy Writebol and she is flying with a medical evacuation team to the U.S. for treatment.

See anything suspicious about her name?

Look again. Nancy Writebol.

Coincidence? Uh huh. Like all the other coincidences surrounding fake headline propaganda news events designed to usher in a New World Order and win your cooperation.

Would it surprise you to see a news story headline next that says “EBOLA VIRUS SPREADS IN USA?”

Of course not! You have been predictably programmed to say, “I knew it! I told you so!”

Was the controlled demolition bombing of New York’s twin towers on 9/11 a coincidence with the chosen date that matched the emergency 9-1-1 number?

How about Fukushima, the targeted city in Japan that provoked Japan’s “economic” tsunami. Was that a false flag event? Is the name FUK U (shima) a coincidence?

What about the earthquake in BAM, Iran? Was that a coincidence or HAARP’s climate weponry?


1. High Profile Event

The first question to ask when you see headline news is “Is this a high profile incident?” The answer, of course, is fairly obvious. If an attack takes place at the World Trade Center complex causing the buildings to explode and collapse in what looks like a “controlled demolition”, or if it takes place at the White House, or Pentagon, it is clearly high profile. Thus, the location can be factored in. In other circumstances, however, the act itself may be the major factor such as the case in Sandy Hook Elementary School, a nationally unimportant location but a horrific act that made national news. The most important factor, of course, is media attention. Regardless of location or the act, if the media picks up the story and runs it simultaneously on all major mainstream channels, the incident can be considered a “high profile event.”

2. Coincidences And Clues

Every false flag operation has a false flag signature in the form of “uncanny coincidences”. Here’s a few examples of “uncanny coincidences” and pre-disaster-event clues to refresh our memories.

Was it a coincidence that 9/11 and the emergency number 9-1-1 are the same? Was it a coincidence that corporate stock market bets on the downed airlines (“put” options) skyrocketed the day BEFORE 9/11 indicating advance knowledge? Was it a coincidence that Israeli companies at the twin towers moved out just before 9/11 and that VIP’s were told not to fly on 9/11, or that there was dozens of examples of pre-9/11 TV/Film content like “the Simpsons”, “the Matrix”. The Lone Gunman, a short-lived spinoff of the X-Files carried a storyline in which a passenger plane was hijacked via remote control and was being flown into the World Trade Center towers.

Is it a coincidence that Malaysian flight MH370 and the downed Malaysian flight MH17 were both Boeing 777’s and that one was destroyed only a few months after the other one disappeared? The letters MH370 spell “Elohm”, the Satanic Zionist god (the 3 is reversed and the 7 is mirrored).

Is it a coincidence that just prior to the Sandy Hook disaster, the mobster owned Hollywood movie studios released the movie “Dark Knight Rising” with a finger pointing to Sandy Hook on a map? Is it a coincidence that the mobster owned TV networks released a “Family Guy” episode illustrating the Boston Marathon bombing?

3. Predictive Programming

Why do the Zionist mobsters give us advance previews of their planned disasters through their media empires? Because they are programming us for acceptance of their manufactured false flag events that are designed to usher in their new World Order. Their advance film and TV clues puts their signature on the event for insiders to see as well.

World War Z (rhymes with World war 3) starring Brad Pitt previews a global pandemic which we have been programmed to predict and even accept as inevitable.

Movie and TV Show Clues often involve the portrayal of the very incident occurring in a movie or television show. In other instances, it may involve the conspicuous or even inconspicuous placement of random details of the attack into movies and television.

4. Who Benefits? 

The most important question to ask immediately after any high profile incident is “Who benefits?”

Ask yourself if the event brings us closer to the planned New World Order? Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon were about scaring the public into giving up their right to bear arms.

9/11 was about scaring people into giving up their tax dollars to attack, loot, occupy, depopulate the middle east and impose greater surveillance and a police state conditions.

If one is able to see a clear benefit to any government, corporation, or bank or pharmaceutical company then the observer becomes capable of seeing through the false flag attack immediately. Many of these questions can be answered by taking a closer look at the behavior of these organizations prior to the attack and shortly thereafter.

For instance, the presence of legislation which would stand little chance of being passed before the attack but which is quickly passed (or at least heavily pushed) afterwards is one clue that the conveniently timed attack was actually a false flag. Patriot Act style legislation was actuallywritten before 9/11 but stood little chance of passing in Congress due to the political climate in the United States at the time. After 9/11, however, the Patriot Act was fast-tracked through both Houses of Congress with virtually no debate and with the blessing of the American people.

Returning to 9/11, it is a fact that a number of individuals who were in positions of power within the US government during the time the attack occurred had desperately wanted to invade several Middle Eastern countries.[4] After the attacks, a war psychosis gripped the ruling class of the United States and the American public followed right along.

After the Underwear Bombing, we saw the rollout of the TSA full-body scanners, a technology which would not have been readily accepted prior to the incident and subsequent propaganda campaign. However, the scanners had been purchased one year earlier by a firm owned by Michael Chertoff, the former head of Homeland Security.

Likewise, in terms of the LAX shooting, TSA purchased 3.5 million dollars worth of ammunition in August. Yet, in August, TSA was not an armed agency. After the LAX shooting, however, talk has turned to arming the agency, thus indicating possible foreknowledge on the part of someone higher up in the governmental structure.

Of course, the same can be said for the explosion of crazed lone-gunman shooting sprees that took place all across the United States amid propaganda pushes for increased gun control measures.

5. Changing Stories

 In informed researching circles, it is well-known that the information that comes out shortly after the event is usually the most reliable. This is not to discount the existence of confusion related to panicked reports coming from eyewitnesses and the like. However, the information coming out early on has not yet been subjected to the top-down media revision that will inevitably take place as the story becomes molded to fit the narrative pushed by the individuals who either directed the attack at the higher levels or at least have connections with those who are able to control the manner in which various media outlets report the event.

For instance, in times of false flag attacks, the initial reports may point to 5 gunmen. Very shortly after, reports may only mention two. Only a few hours after the attack, however, all references to more than one gunmen are removed entirely, with only the “lone gunman” story remaining. Any other mention of additional gunmen after this point is ridiculed as “conspiracy theory.”

6. Simultaneous Drills

 One hallmark of the false flag operation is the running of drills shortly before or during the actual attack. Many times, these drills will involve the actual sequence of events that takes place during the real life attack . These drills have been present on large scale false flags such as 9/11 as well as smaller scale attacks like the Aurora shooting.

For instance, as Webster Tarpley documents in his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made In USA, at least 46 drills were underway in the months leading up to 9/11 and on the morning of the attack. These 46 drills were all directly related to the events which took place on 9/11 in some way or other.[1] Likewise, the 7/7 bombings in London were running drills of exactly the same scenario that was occurring at exactly the same times and locations.

Although one reason may take precedence over the other depending on the nature and purpose of the operation drills are used by false flag operators for at least two reasons. One such purpose is the creation of intentional confusion if the drill is taking place during the actual attack. The other, more effective aspect, however, is using the drill as a cloak to plan the attack or even “go live” when it comes time to launch the event. Even more so, it gives the individuals who are involved in the planning of the event an element of cover, especially with the military/intelligence agency’s tight chain of command structure and need-to-know basis. If a loyal military officer or intelligence agent stumbles upon the planning of the attack, that individual can always be told that what he has witnessed is nothing more than the planning of a training exercise. This deniability continues all the way through to the actual “going live” of the drill. After the completion of the false flag attack, Coincidence Theory is used to explain away the tragic results.[2]

7. Unanswered Questions

 Another hallmark of the false flag operation is relatively obvious – the presence of unanswered questions regarding the details of the attack, the perpetrators, the motive and so on. Although the media narrative that takes shape soon after the attack will ignore these questions, they will inevitably remain if observers are able to think for themselves and focus only on the information. An example of such questions would be Building 7 on 9/11 or the questions of additional shooters at Aurora and Sandy Hook.

8. Case is quickly closed

 Once an acceptable patsy and cover story is chosen by the media, all other opinions and questions are refused air time. Nothing that even slightly contradicts the official story is acknowledged as legitimate. Once this happens, the patsy, if still alive (in rare circumstances) is charged, prosecuted, and convicted in a largely secret or shadowy proceeding. In most cases, the suspect is killed in the process or shortly after the fact thus negating any first hand contradiction of the official narrative. Either way, the case is closed very soon after the event.

9. Suspects’ Connection to CIA, FBI, or Other Intelligence Agencies

 One key aspect suggesting a false flag that should be looked for soon after the attack is anypossible connection the suspect or group of suspects may have had with intelligence agencies. A connection to any one of these organizations and institutions may go some length in explaining how the attack was coordinated, the motivation of the perpetrators, the actual involvement (or not) of the suspects, and who actually directed the operation. For instance, on 9/11, many of the alleged hijackers had previously had close contact with the FBI, CIA, and other high-level intelligence agencies (both home and abroad).[5] Likewise, the Tsarnaev brothers who have been accused of masterminding and carrying out the Boston Bombing had ties to the FBI before the attack.

In many instances, connections to certain military agencies and communities should serve as the same red flag as connections to intelligence agencies since these institutions have largely been blended together.

10. Convenient Patsy

 One clue leading an informed observer to suspect a false flag attack is the existence of the convenient scapegoat. Any false flag operation will have a carefully crafted narrative complete with a group of individuals set up for demonization. The OKC bombing had McVeigh and thus, “right-wing extremists” and “militias.” On 9/11, the group was Muslims. In many of the domestic shooting sprees, the demonization was set for gun owners. With the recent LAX shooting, the “perpetrator” was an “anti-government conspiracy theorist.” In the instance of the false flag, a readily identified pasty will exhibit all or most of the aspects of the group and social demographic set to be demonized.

11. Media Demonizes An Individual Or Group

 One clue suggesting a false flag is that, immediately after the attack and after the perpetrators have been “identified” by “officials” and the media, corporate media outlets begin not only demonizing the demographic group to which the “perpetrator” belongs, but begins promoting “solutions” in order to prevent such an attack from ever happening again. This narrative will always involve the erosion of liberties, the greater implementation of a police state, a specific economic policy, or a march to war.

Simply put, the media promotes the PROBLEM, allows for and guides the REACTION, and then provides the pre-determined SOLUTION.

12. Government Begins to “Take Action

After a healthy dose of propaganda from mainstream media outlets regurgitating the terror of the attack, the perpetrator, and the police state solutions, the Government then begins to take action. Political speeches are given in order to capitalize on the fear and anger felt by the public and in order to reinforce the idea that government is there to act as protector. Political solutions are then offered as bills, executive orders, or political mandates whether it is the curtailment of the 4th Amendment, gun control, or military strikes on a foreign country.


Although it is extremely important to educate ourselves about the nature and purpose of false flags, education cannot be a goal in and of itself. The public not only needs to know the truth surrounding specific false flag events as they appear, they need to understand the methodology of identifying them on their own and in real time.

Creating a culture in which the general public is able to recognize the false flag attack as it is happening, without the need for a massive push by alternative media sources, researchers, or activists, is the first step in not only rendering the tactic useless, but in corralling the force of the people toward true action or, at the very least, creating a culture in which that force cannot be corralled by the ruling class.

While false flag attacks must be addressed, we must not allow ourselves to be so easily diverted off a path of political action and mass mobilization against the imposition by the ruling crime families of a New World Order.

Start the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.