Bringing Back ‘Archaic and Gruesome Weapons,’ Trump Reverses US Restrictions on Landmines

“The United States is doing a 180 on the near-global consensus to ban the abhorrent and inhumane use of landmines. These indiscriminate weapons maim and kill. They destroy families and communities, arable land, and livestock,” said Michael Payne, interim advocacy director at Physicians for Human Rights, a group that helped launch the International Campaign to Ban Landmines.

Payne, in his statement, rejected the assertion that “advanced” landmines would spare civilians harm.

“Despite any purported technological advancements, landmines are still capable of causing indiscriminate harm and egregious injury and suffering,” he said. “By loosening restrictions on landmine use, the United States is signaling to other countries around the world that landmines can be acceptable. The Trump administration should not normalize these archaic and gruesome weapons, which have no place in the 21st century.

Jeff Abramson, senior fellow with the Arms Control Association, similar rejected the notion of an “advanced” landmine.

“The world has rejected landmines because they are indiscriminate and disproportionately harm civilians, who make up the vast majority of landmine casualties. Technical solutions to make landmines self-destruct or otherwise labeled as ‘smart’ have failed to work as advertised and been rejected by the 164 counties, including all U.S. NATO allies, that have joined the Mine Ban Treaty,” said Abramson.

“Most of the world’s countries have embraced the ban on antipersonnel landmines for more than two decades, while the Trump administration has done a complete about-face in deciding to cling to these weapons in perpetuity,” said Steve Goose, director of the arms division at Human Rights Watch. “Using landmines, which have claimed so many lives and limbs, is not justified by any country or group under any circumstances.”

“Trump’s new policy to use antipersonnel mines any time anywhere in the world is a retrograde action that should be condemned,” Goose added. “All presidential candidates should endorse the goal of banning landmines.”

The new policy also came in for criticism from Sen. Patrick Leahy, who’s long advocated for a ban. The Trump administration’s reversal, said Leahy, is a clear move—apparently without congressional approval—in the wrong direction.

The rollback, said Leahy, “is as perplexing as it is disappointing, and reflexive, and unwise.”

Though not being party to the international treaty, “we have consistently sought to limit their production, export, and use,” Leahy said. “We have also spent billions of dollars clearing landmines and other unexploded ordnance, and we have supported programs in dozens of countries to help people severely disabled by landmines regain their mobility and support themselves and their families. This has brought immense goodwill to the United States, including from former enemies.”

“This decision,” he continued, “like so many others of this White House, reverses the gains we have made and weakens our global leadership.”

The Mine Ban Treaty, according to Nobel peace laureate Jody Williams, is still going to be an effective tool.

“The beauty of the treaty is that it has established a new norm and even countries outside the treaty felt the stigma related to landmines and changed policies, even if they didn’t join the treaty,” Williams said to Common Dreams Thursday.

“Mr. Trump’s landmine move would be in line with all of his other moves to undercut arms control and disarmament in a world much in need of them,” she continued. “The landmine ban movement will do what it has always done with governments that still remain outside the Mine Ban Treaty—push back and continue the push to universalize the treaty—including the U.S.”