Wicked Local – by Cohasset Mariner, April 14, 2017
Cohasset police seized approximately 100 unsecured weapons including shotguns, rifles and pistols from 50 Doane St. Friday afternoon. A Navy unit out of Newport, R.I. took custody of five military-grade ordnance shells also found in the home.
Police received information from a credible source that the resident at that address had numerous unsecured rifles and shotguns strewn about his house and as a result, obtained a search warrant issued by a Clerk Magistrate at Quincy District Court. They executed the search warrant at 2 p.m.
When the military shells were found, officers backed out of the home and notified the Massachusetts State Police Bomb Squad. Members of the bomb squad arrived, assessed the shells, notified the United States Navy, and requested that they respond to take custody of the items. It is not known if the shells are live or not.
Chief Bill Quigley explained that under state law firearms have to be secured in a locked cabinet or with a trigger lock. The 65-year-old man, who lives alone, did have a license to possess rifles and shotguns, which was revoked by Quigley on Friday. All of his weapons have been seized.
“There are no more firearms in the house and in the adjacent building which he also owns that was searched as well,” Quigley said.
This case remains under investigation by the Cohasset Police.
“… 5 military-grade shells”
Are there any other kind?
I’ve never heard of any civilian-grade shells.
Regardless, it’s STILL a BLATANT INFRINGEMENT on his 2nd amendment right.
OINK OINK!!!!!!!!!
SQUEAL!!!!!!!!!!!!
THIEVIN ASS PIGS…………..
I can’t think of any law he’s broken. We do have a 2nd Amendment. Unless he is a felon, which the article did not mention, what has he done wrong? Well, this is Massachusetts so maybe that’s what’s wrong.
“Unless he is a felon, which the article did not mention, what has he done wrong?”
EXCUSE ME?????
WHAT THE HELL DOES BEING A FELON HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING???
Kindly point out WHERE in the 2nd it says ANYTHING OTHER than “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” PERIOD!!!!!
Lay off the Kool-Aid, dude!
“Cohasset police seized approximately 100 unsecured weapons including shotguns, rifles and pistols from 50 Doane St. Friday afternoon. A Navy unit out of Newport, R.I. took custody of five military-grade ordnance shells also found in the home.”
Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878): “TO PROHIBIT A CITIZEN FROM WEARING OR CARRYING A WAR ARM … IS AN UNWARRANTED RESTRICTION UPON THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege.”
Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822): “For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution.”
Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846): ” `The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.’ The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right.”
Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859): “The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the “high powers” delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.’ A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power.”
Joel Barlow, “Advice to the Privileged Orders”: “The danger (where there is any) from armed citizens, is only to the *government*, not to *society*; and as long as they have nothing to revenge in the government (which they cannot have while it is in their own hands) there are many advantages in their being accustomed to the use of arms, and no possible disadvantage.”
This
Title 18 U.S. Code section 2381: “When in the presence of two witnesses to the same overt act or in an open court of law if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason, and upon conviction you will be taken by the posse to the nearest busy intersection and at high noon hung by the neck until dead…The body to remain in state till dusk as an example to anyone who takes his oath of office lightly.
Was Sadly Changed by progressives to this
Title 18 U.S. Code section 2381: Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
We need the first version back!
Agreed.
Nwo…sea shells…
Gotta keep the powder dry and shit wired tight. They is always looking, no need to advertise.
Whatever they have… we can have, and more.
And we DON’T need their damn ‘PERMISSION’, right?
The post that came next, from earlier today is GONE, wtf? happened to it?
A Drill Down On The Origin Of The Income Tax
Posted on April 20, 2017 by Katie
Continue reading →
Posted in Videos | 1 Comment
and the one after that too, wtf is going on? did the site get hacked? by irs goons? see;
Joe Black Testifies About CtC And The Truth About The Tax
Posted on April 20, 2017 by Katie
Continue reading →
Posted in Videos | Leave a comment
I have both still up from when I had to leave and came back and clicked on those 2 articles/videos to open in new tab and I get page not found
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/joe-black-testifies-ctc-truth-tax__trashed/187612
I tried clicking on just the comments and page not found again
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/drill-origin-income-tax__trashed/187614#comments
Just in case you did not know or maybe you deleted them, dont know either way, it your site and you can do as you will with it. For the record, I am not trying to cause a fuse or trouble ok, just thought you might like to know.