from 911truthncDotOrg;
VIDEO: The Physics, the speed, the hidden technology – even the military radar – all suggests there may be more than meets the eye as it pertains to the WTC 9/11 planes.
Posted: June 8, 2016
From the Trenches World Report
Enforce our Bill of Rights
Misty, here’s a link to a video that goes into alot of depth regarding CG technology. This video came up after the one you posted. Your post inspired me to watch the one I’ve linked to for you.
“Does This Evidence Prove The 9/11 Planes Were SIMULATED?”
No, without watching the video, I can guarantee that it doesn’t.
Did you ever wonder why people don’t believe you when you tell them “9-11 was an inside job”?
Are you curious to know why they make tin foil hat jokes when you try to discuss government crime?
It’s because no planes hit the towers, Bigfoot rigged the elections, and Obama’s wife has a penis because she’s a space alien.
Misty, I’d say yes, it proves NO planes hit the towers.
1000’s of people reported hearing no aircraft sound, as well as seeing no aircraft!
Unbelievable!!
What we saw on t.v. was different than what the people on the ground saw.
After watching the vid. you posted as well as the one I did, I’m convinced NO plane hit the towers.
We were watching a video in effect.
where are the passengers on the supposedly hijacked planes, where are the planes.
bj, take a look at this info., may answer your question.
http://letsrollforums.com//happened-passengers-4-flights-t20496.html?s=fb82112abaa750cc70ba3b281785ec7c&
Well now I am really confused, don’t misunderstand me I know something happened I believe the story, I just don’t think that all those passengers changed their identity and moved to an island and were never heard from again, If you had said they were vaporized as they disappeared from radar as they approached their destination, and there was no visable evidence just a flash, and horrific as that sounds its more believable that identity changes and staying undercover for all of these years….Just sayn
Most likely ushered into DUMBs.
Reminds me of the time four of us pulverized a steel & concrete building with nothing more than aluminum baseball bats.
One on each corner… had that sucker down in record time!
Okay….I watched the first three minutes of it. That’s all of this nonsense I have time for, and that’s all that’s required to see how they’re trying to make you look foolish this time.
They keep shouting about the “physics”, but that’s exactly what they’re ignoring. Forget the plane impacts shown; none of them apply to the impact of the trade center, because you’re dealing with different directions of force (snapping wings and tail sections have absolutely nothing to do with the sheering force of a fuel-filled wing). Forget the truck hitting the wall, because that has nothing to do with this either.
Forget the idiot’s comment on the wingtip in relation to the hole, because she’s assuming it was a 767, and the only people who claim it was a 767 also claim Bin laden orchestrated the attacks. (witnesses said “it definitely wasn’t a passenger plane”).
Forget the rantings of these lying Jews. Here is the real science behind this impact:
Force is determined by mass times velocity, and it’s divided over the area of impact to determine how much is applied to any given object.
Forget the differences in material (steel vs. aluminum), because it’s irrelevant in calculating sheering force, which is what we’re dealing with here. Because they’re filled with fluid (fuel), the wings are calculated to be solid objects, and will behave as such in this collision.
The area of impact you’re dividing the force over is the front edge of the wing, which is very small, making the force very large, such as is delivered by a knife blade, or similar wedge.
Here’s how it’s done:
1. find the thickness of the columns on the 82nd floor. (they were tapered,and thinner at the top).
2. subtract the empty space between them, because no force is applied to it.
3. Find the sheer-force failure value of the column in questions from a civil engineer’s reference book of such data.
3. Multiply the plane’s speed by the weight of the fuel-filled wing, and that will give you a result in foot-pounds.
4. Divide the foot-pounds by the steel it has to sever to pass into the building.
Yes, the real science is boring, and not nearly as much fun as watching videos. That’s what they’re counting on.
This is a lot of research and math that they’re confident you won’t bother with, but I did it a decade ago, and found that the plane had more than enough force to slice through the side of that building, just as it happened in the video.
I’m judging by the comments that they’re also changing history:
“1000’s of people reported hearing no aircraft sound, as well as seeing no aircraft!”
This is a bold-faced lie, because no one interviewed thousands of people, and I personally know people who heard the plane, and watched the plane hit the tower.
NOW… LOOK AT THE GODDAMN HOLES IN THE SIDE OF THE BUILDINGS. You can clearly see columns and their aluminum casings bent inward around the edge of the hole. If no planes hit the towers, the hole would have had to have been blown by explosive inside the building, and that would have bent them outward.
If people want to cling to this “no plane” stupidity in defiance of the evidence and the science, there’s nothing I can do to stop them, but please know that you’re making the rest of us look foolish by association, and thereby working against the dissemination of truth.
You’re being played by the commies to make us all look like idiots. Thanks.
Your opinion is the one shared by the vast majority of SHEEPLE. We all know how intelligent THEY are.
I’ll stick with the Trenchers majority opinion.
http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/trenchers-911no-planes-poll/151779
Newton’s Third Law of Physics says you’re dead wrong.