Is WikiLeaks CIA? Red Flags Say PSYOP! Hillary Safe From FAKE Assange?


Published on Oct 18, 2016 by Barry Soetoro

RED FLAGS SUGGEST “WIKILEAKS” MAY BE ANOTHER CIA OPERATION TO SWAMP VOTERS WITH TEMPTING YET USELESS “LEAKS” UNTIL ELECTION DAY 2016. IS JULIAN ASSANGE JUST ANOTHER ACTOR, DISTRACTING US TO COVER FOR HILLARY CLINTON WHILE SHE STEALS THE PRESIDENCY?

THE REAL ‘CLINTON STORY’ IS RAPE, MURDER, AND TREASON. BUT WIKILEAKS KEEPS DUMPING THOUSANDS OF EMBARRASSING EMAILS — THAT ARE ONLY ‘MILD.’

AS WE AWAIT EARTH-SHATTERING LEAKS BY JULIAN ASSANGE, LET’S CONSIDER THESE ‘RED FLAGS’ IN THE WIKILEAKS STORYLINE — WHICH SUGGEST ASSANGE MIGHT BE CIA.

MICHAEL HASTINGS ‘CAR BOMB’ CIA HOAX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF0zY…

HILLARY SANDY HOOK CONNECTION:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt4ZV…

HILLARY’S PACK OF RAPISTS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjyPx…

7 thoughts on “Is WikiLeaks CIA? Red Flags Say PSYOP! Hillary Safe From FAKE Assange?

  1. I’m NOT buying it Henry and WHOever “Barry Soetoro” is putting this out…

    here’s something to Google that will make this vid look STUPID

    Julian Assange N379P

    Tim White in Vancouver BC
    Dual Citizen Viet Nam USAF Veteran from Denver

  2. Hillary’s connection to Sandy Hook? I musta missed something, yup, a couple marbles rolled out my ear. The Wheelers?

    Disinfo and distraction has achieved “Warp 9”.

    Hey, I’m not a Hillary or Trump fan, but this has been “The Daily Show” comedy day since this gig kicked off.

    Wikileaks and Assange have been “neutralized”, they just got a few loose ends to tie up, then it’s beer30!

    Who gives a rat’s arse? We’ll dust it off tomorrow and look at it. “The Truth Goes Marching On!” I sang that song once in my youth, boy, was that a long time ago. “Glory, Glory, hallelujah!”

  3. And maybe claims such as “Wikileaks is CIA” are being put out BY THE CIA to discredit Wikileaks and minimize the damage done by Assange et al.? We could go round and round with that sort of accusation, and it can get silly in a hurry.

    I see no reason to doubt what’s been released by Wikileaks so far. Apparently the info in question does little more than confirm some things we already knew.

    Sure, the rabbit hole undoubtedly goes much deeper. But classified information in the government is compartmentalized precisely in order to minimize the damage that can be caused by any single leak.

    Thus, these leaks aren’t likely to mention the truth behind 9/11, etc. The number of people in the US government who are privy to that sort of information is almost certainly miniscule. It’s possible that even Hillary Clinton doesn’t know the full story behind 9/11 despite being a highly connected insider. As a general rule, the more sensitive the information, the fewer people are given access to it, and the less likely anyone will blow the whistle.

  4. Assange is a total fake. As is WikiLeaks. In fact all of these “whistleblowers” are fake. You just don’t release secret government information, and then get invited for a friendly chat with Anderson Cooper on CNN.
    The only thing any of us know about Assange is what the MSM has told us.
    I guess it depends on how much you trust the MSM.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.


*