The Israeli military believes there is now an opportunity to bomb Iran due to the weakening of its allies in the region following the ousting of former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, The Times of Israel reported on Thursday.
Israeli military officials said in the wake of the regime change in Syria, the Israeli Air Force has increased its preparations for a potential attack on Iran.
The Times report said the IDF is considering launching strikes on Iran’s nuclear program. While Israeli officials are constantly claiming Iran is seeking nuclear weapons, there is no evidence that’s the case, a fact recently acknowledged by the CIA.
In the wake of Assad’s ouster, Israel launched a massive bombing campaign in Syria, launching 480 strikes in just 48 hours. The Israeli military said it decimated the former government’s military assets, destroying about 80% of the equipment that was left behind.
Israeli officials now say they have total air superiority over Syria due to the lack of air defenses, which could make it easier to launch airstrikes on Iran. Israeli warplanes used to have to avoid air defenses when bombing Syria, but now Israeli officials say they’re able to fly over Damascus without having to worry about getting shot down by Russian-made air defenses.
Israel last bombed Iran in October, attacks that damaged some air defenses and killed four Iranian soldiers and one civilian. Iranian officials vowed a response to the attack, but nothing has happened so far. Israel launched the strikes on Iran in response to an Iranian ballistic missile attack on Israel that was retaliation for a string of Israeli escalations in the region.
I think Bibi’s wet-dream is to turn the Mid-East into a type of E.U. Yeah, sovereignty be damned!! How else to own all those resources? But the Mid-East is only the beginning of his ever expanding dream. He’s already got the U.S. and most of the west, and then some!! Instead of calling The One World Order globalism, it might more rightly be called Bibiism, or more accurately, judaism. How will the globe respond? We’re at Mordor’s gate. Will we run or enter?
.
Ha! I’ve been calling it the jWO for as long as I can remember. I always thought it was more accurate & fitting 😉
An anti-war voice from over half a century ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-YYLHW3ilU
.
Every time I reflect on my anti-war days, two terms float through my mind: just war and unjust war, leaving me asking myself to define what these actually are. It’s easy to see an unjust war is pure corruption fueled by supremacy delusions, power, greed, and profound insecurity. But a just war, if truly just, can only be from a defensive stance: a devastating wrong inflicted, a right horribly violated, an innocent life threatened, an innocent life taken, many innocent lives taken. These are just a few examples.
Considering history, it’s evident that today, the level of infringement and murderous infringement has again reached genocidal levels, the cruelest of all war games. So fighting for The Bill of Rights comes to mind as cause for a just war, a war each individual will decide how to engage in.
Dictionary says a just war is “a war that is deemed to be morally justifiable.” Could that be inverted to mean that not engaging in a just war in immoral? I think it can. But there is the dilemma of each defining what “just” means. The super powers always tell us their wars are just. We know they lie. So what is left but to dig deep inside where mind has a talk with conscience and heart. Are we just gonna let this thing ride itself out all the way to global tyranny and more wars to kill us? Or…
Damn, I hate that The Bill of Rights is not given the credit it deserves. It would, if enforced, put a mighty halt on all the corruption. And here we are again, but still, it’s all worth sayin’ if somehow a door shows an opening. There sure are lots of doors.
.