Shahed Ghoreishi recommended expressing condolences for slain journalists in Gaza and opposing the forced displacement of Palestinians, according to documents reviewed by The Post. He was fired days later.
The State Department fired its top press officer for Israeli-Palestinian affairs following multiple disputes over how to characterize key Trump administration policies, including a controversial plan to relocate hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip that critics consider ethnic cleansing, according to U.S. officials and documents reviewed by The Washington Post.
Monday’s firing occurred days after an internal debate about releasing a statement to the news media that said, “We do not support forced displacement of Palestinians in Gaza.”
Shahed Ghoreishi drafted the line, which resembled previous remarks made by President Donald Trump and Middle East special envoy Steve Witkoff, who said in Februarythe United States would not pursue an “eviction plan” for Gaza. State Department leadership vetoed the move, instructing officials to “cut the line marked in red and clear,” according to a memo dated last week.
U.S. officials said Ghoreishi’s firing has sent a chilling message to State Department employees that communication straying from ardent pro-Israel messaging — even if it’s in line with long-standing U.S. policy — will not be tolerated. The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters.
The State Department did not offer a rationale for Ghoreishi’s firing but suggested he had strayed from the White House’s agenda. “We do not comment on leaked emails or allegations,” State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott said. “Federal employees should never put their personal political ideologies ahead of the duly elected president’s agenda.”
Ghoreishi told The Post he was not given an explanation for his firing, which the State Department was not required to provide due to his status as a contractor. He said the incident raised troubling questions about the department’s position on the potential expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza.
“Despite a strong reputation and close working relationship with many of my colleagues, I was unable to survive these disputes,” he said, noting the language he recommended for the media statement had been previously cleared by the State Department since Trump took office on Jan. 20.
Another dispute inside the State Department occurred earlier this month following Israel’s targeted killing of Al Jazeera journalist Anas al-Sharif and several other journalists in Gaza City.
Israel claimed al-Sharif was a Hamas member, a charge denied by Al Jazeera. Israel has not made similar claims about the cameraman and other journalists killed alongside al-Sharif.
As officials contemplated how the State Department should address the incident, Ghoreishi recommended including a line that said “We mourn the loss of journalists and express condolences to their families.” State Department leadership objected in an email sent Aug. 10. “No response is needed,” said the email. “We can’t be sending out condolences if we are unsure of this individual’s actions.”
A key opponent of Ghoreishi within the department was David Milstein, a senior adviser to Mike Huckabee, the U.S. ambassador to Israel. Milstein is known for confronting staff throughout the department in defense of the Israeli government, said officials familiar with the matter.
Critics of Milstein within the State Department contend he appears overly eager to please Israeli officials and frequently involves himself in matters that are beyond the scope of his responsibilities. “Milstein is an adviser to an ambassador,” one official said. “That’s it, yet he has his hands in everything.”
Milstein did not respond to a request for comment.
Milstein and other State Department officials clashed in July when Milstein sought to release a statement under Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s name that condemned Ireland for considering legislation that would ban trade with illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, said officials. The effort alarmed U.S. diplomats in Europe, who viewed the appropriate next step to be consulting with Irish officials in private before publicly condemning the country’s actions. Ultimately, U.S. diplomats overseeing Europe and the Middle East prevailed over Milstein and prevented the statement’s release.
More recently, Milstein and Ghoreishi disagreed over Milstein’s push for the State Department to refer to the West Bank as “Judea and Samaria,” the biblical name for the region that is widely used within Israel. The territory is internationally recognized as the West Bank and Palestinians object to the use of Judea and Samaria as legitimizing Israeli settlements and potential annexation — a concern also shared by advocates of a two-state solution.
A Milstein memo reviewed by The Post was drafted in response to questions from the Associated Press about House Speaker Mike Johnson’s visit to the territory. The memo praised Johnson (R-Louisiana) for “making history as the highest-ranking U.S. official and first speaker of the House to ever go to Judea and Samaria.”
Ghoreishi managed to cut that line before it was shared with the news media and inserted previously approved State Department language that used West Bank while referring other questions about Johnson’s trip to his “office for further information,” the line said.
The question about displacement from Gaza is particularly relevant given reports that Israeli officials are in talks with South Sudan about relocating thousands of Palestinians to the war-torn African nation. Critics say the plan, if implemented, would amount to ethnic cleansing and a war crime. Israeli officials say the plan would amount to “voluntary migration,” a characterization challenged by those noting the besieged enclave’s chronic lack of food and water, and sustained Israeli military campaign.