Gordon Duff of Veterans Today recently published an article that clearly exposes him as an agent of disinformation who is working to obscure the truth about what happened on 9-11. Why is he doing this and who is he working for?
Gordon Duff, senior editor of the website Veterans Today, published an article on May 20, 2014, that can only be described as rank disinformation that is meant to obscure the truth about 9-11.
The article, entitled “Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed – Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation” contains many flagrant errors as it pushes the idea that nuclear bombs were used to bring down the Twin Towers. Duff claims the evidence of a bi-layered composite of super-thermite found in the dust of the towers was somehow produced by the nuclear explosion that destroyed the tower.
Chips of the active thermitic material found in the dust of the destroyed Twin Towers. This material, which was manufactured using nano-technology, is extremely energetic and releases more energy per gram than all other known explosives used in demolition.
9-11 GUFF FROM GORDON DUFF
The Duff article, which was edited by Jim W. Dean, is so full of errors that it cannot be taken seriously, except perhaps as evidence of his role as a agent of disinformation about 9-11. With this in mind, I wrote to Mr. Duff on May 23 to ask him why he had published this piece:
Dear Mr. Duff,
I am writing to ask you about your recent article, “Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed”.
Why did you publish this piece, which is clearly disinformation about 9-11, at this particular time? Who are you doing this for? I would think that this piece, which contains so many flagrant errors, clearly exposes you as an agent of 9-11 disinformation.
Can you explain why you published this article?
Christopher Bollyn
Gordon Duff responded the same day:
chris
of those involved in 9/11, you are one of the few who actually does work. of those involved in 9/11, i am the only one with a background in intelligence and who works actively in that area.
the piece, as published, is what was submitted. it, of course, debunks nanothermite, something the scientific community did years ago.
you see, i met the group working on nano-thermite, people well known to stephen jones, when they came to me for investment. their security officer, claudio d la’o, brought them to me.
no nanothermite was ever produced, a propellant with no production facility nor any purpose other than to replace the gun on the apache, something not done.
did you ever find the factory that you believe made it? I can give you several reasons you didn’t.
I believe that “nanothermite” is the creation of disinformation agents. others who believe have become proprietary and defensive.
this is the first material that has come from a national intelligence agency. it is a huge breakthru for us.
as you had found ‘9/11 truth’ totally stalled, over a decade now, hobbiests, freaks, shills, many of those, time wasters, i have long disassociated myself.
i am surprised at your accusation. VT has done more real damage that all others combined, by such a margin it is not worth discussing. we are ‘the last man standing.’
you know, publishing books can be a problem. you take hits. i accept them. you don’t.
I also simply run with the best information I can get and have the facilities to investigate things. after all, i do run a company with both a counter-intelligence division and one that does international criminal investigations.
my chief of staff was attache to israel and had investigated dimona. he is far from my only personal source.
admit this, you would never have access to something like that. I admit that I am prevented from printing what I could.
accept that the sale of nuclear material by the bush family is real. accept other things you choose to.
doubt everything.
please note that i am not an internet person. i just returned from Africa, i have defense contracts there and the middle east. i have a scientific staff with full nuclear clearances (i dont have). my group has done security assessments at all our nuclear facilities.
i don’t look down on you but i do look down on most others and deeply resent them.
i have never spoken a word against you. i respect what you have done.
however, you have to admit that i have taken on more “risk” and been more confrontive than all combined. I do this, to an extent, because I am not entirely without some protecting and backing.
If you really think I can be “gotten to,” you have not been paying attention. you are attacking my analysis through a bizarre personal accusation not only without foundation but almost irrational.
do this: prove me wrong. show me a nanothermite factory. get me people who have handled tons of it. show me how it was applied and used.
duplicate your hypothesis experimentally.
The russians have done that.
g [Gordon Duff]
CHECKING THE FACTS
The obvious purpose of the Gordon Duff article is to try to deny the presence and role of thermite (super-thermite in particular) in the destruction of the towers. The Duff piece contains so many errors that I am only going to point out those that pertain directly to the evidence of what happened on 9-11.
The Duff piece claims that nuclear devices were used on 9-11 and that these melted the “I beams of the central core” of the Twin Towers.
Fact: The core columns of the Twin Towers were box columns. I don’t know what “I beams” he is talking about. The walls of the central box columns were 4 inches thick at the base and tapered to about 1/4 inch at the top of the towers.
The core box columns that held up the Twin Towers can be seen in this photo. The box column in the center appears to have been cut with a steel-melting charge of thermite.
The Duff piece says: “Melted steel and iron oxide or ‘nano-thermite’ is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray/Neutron flux induced into the central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into oxide consuming the carbon and silicone [sic] in the steel.”
Fact: Iron oxide, or rust, is a component of thermite, not a product of a thermite reaction. What was found in the dust was large amounts of molten iron droplets or spheres. The molten iron that was found in the dust and at the base of the destroyed towers is evidence of a thermitic reaction, not a nuclear bomb.
One of the iron-rich spheres found in the dust. These tiny balls of molten iron are a common element of the dust from the World Trade Center demolition.
Fact: The active thermitic material that was found in the dust by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al, was a nano-composite bi-layered material that had been manufactured using nano-technology. This was most certainly not the by-product of a nuclear explosion.
The Duff piece claims that “the upward blast of radiation literally vaporized” the 20-ton antenna tower atop the South Tower.”
Fact: The antenna was on the North Tower, and it did not vaporize at all. It was the first thing to be seen falling as the demolition of the tower began. The base of the antenna is actually on display in the Newseum in Washington, D.C.
Part of the antenna mast that Gordon Duff says was “vaporized”.
The Duff piece concludes: “The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 9-11 was to produce a massive Gama [sic] ray/neutron flux that would vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6-inch thick steel I beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This created the free fall event as seen on TV that day.”
Fact: The Twin Towers were pulverized from the top down. The core columns were severed, which is what caused the antenna mast to fall, but they were not vaporized in a nuclear blast.
The final paragraph of the Duff piece says: “The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so-called Nano Thermite that was found everywhere.”
Fact: This is pure nonsense. Iron oxide was not found all over the place; iron-rich spheres were found in great numbers in the dust – tiny balls of iron that had been in the molten state when the towers were demolished.
This is not the “so-called Nano Thermite” that was found in the dust. These iron-rich spheres are products of the thermitic reaction. Duff is clearly misrepresenting the active thermitic material that was found in the dust. This indicates that neither Duff nor Dean understand what was found in the dust – or they are working to misinform the reader. I can only conclude that the latter is the case and that these men are agents of disinformation about what really happened on 9-11.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
“Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe” by Dr. Steven E. Jones, et al, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009
www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf
“Too Classified to Publish: Bush Nuclear Piracy Exposed – Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation” by Gordon Duff, VeteransToday.com, May 20, 2014
www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/20/too-classified-to-publish-bush-nuclear-piracy-exposed/
“Understanding the Use of Thermite on 9-11” by Christopher Bollyn, July 14, 2009
www.bollyn.com/understanding-the-use-of-thermite-on-9-11/
– See more at: http://www.bollyn.com/#article_14718
Thank you, Wade….. I think we can now safely ignore Gordon Duff without feeling that we’re missing anything important. Judging by his present occupation (as described here) I’d say he’s working for the CIA, and probably always has been.
With these “mini-nuke” and “no plane” theories being thrown back into the limelight after being discredited so long ago, it’s obvious that the spook agencies are worried about the truth conquering new frontiers, and have therefore decided to attack them with straw-man theories that will later be mocked in the mainstream media.
“Those paranoid, tin-foil hat-wearing, crazy conspiracy theorists now claim no planes hit the towers” will be the headline, and everyone you convinced of 9-11 being an inside job will run back to the Zionist media for ‘truth’.
This is actually good news, because it proves that 9-11 truth is breaking out to new hoards of people, or they wouldn’t be worried about it.
I still think it’s the “mother of all issues” because it exposes to people that every single media outlet is capable of collaborating to tell the same lie. It’s easy proof that all they know needs to be questioned.
Its because of Benghazi and the CIA’s open involvement with Al-Qaeda there and in Syria that naturally leads one back to 9/11. They are trying to get ahead of that curve. Watch them start pushing disinfo on the 1993 WTC bombing flat out proven orchestrated by the FBI, or WACO where they failed to do a good job with the original bombing leaving too much evidence behind for General Partin to easily pick apart.
VT has been pushing the 9-11 nuclear nonsense for some time. VT itself is under the umbrella of Adamus Group, for which Duff serves on the board of directors.
Tom Heneghan, in his article, “The Adamus Group Exposed: It’s Nazi Paperclip,” states, “The Adamus Group, which is a worldwide intelligence gathering corporation that manages worldwide databases on behalf of the U.S. NSA (National Security Agency) and then shares their intelligence gathering capability with national intelligence agencies, U.S. law enforcement an the criminal banking giants that have looted the U.S. Treasury and placed the entire savings deposits of Americans, who have their funds in the aforementioned banks, at risk.” This article was posted on FTTWR a year ago, http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/the-adamus-group-exposed-its-nazi-paperclip/44697.
I agree, JR: the facade of the transnational criminal organizations is crumbling. They don’t know what to do, so they’re stepping up the beat, dancing as fast as they can, and continuing to repeat arguments and explanations that have already been torn apart.
Thank you for posting this! Saw on another site yesterday and I remember similar disinfo posted here the other day that seemed to indicate (along with the Carnaby info) that the US govt. was letting Israel nuke this country. Now I realize that Israel IS implicated along with the US govt. in 9-11, but I did not realize disinfo agent Gordon Duff was where the disinfo came from. I don’t always agree with Bollyn but unlike Duff he is NOT a disinfo agent. I can “do the math” (taught it for years) but the science? Physics is not my forte, so thanks for posting and thanks to Bollyn for setting the record straight.