For Truth’s Sake – by David R.
Liberals tend to go on and on about how America is an evil racist place and that the Constitution represents a culture of intolerance and violence. They try to position themselves as being the “compassionate ones” who are ready and willing to go to any length to fix societies wrongs, which of course are the fault of the Constitution and our selfish bill of rights. Often times however, their efforts are driven by nothing more than a fear of what they do not understand, a fear of them self and a misguided belief that the “ends justifies the means.” Most liberals after all, base their tactics for social change off the play book of the left- Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals. On page 25, in a chapter entitled “Of Means and Ends” Alinsky writes the following-
In action, one does not always enjoy the luxury of a decision that is consistent with both one’s individual conscience and the good of mankind. The choice must always be for the latter. Action is for mass salvation and not the individuals personal salvation. He who sacrifices the mass good for his personal conscience has a peculiar conception of “personal salvation,” he doesn’t care enough for the people to be corrupted for them.
That is a pretty telling statement, and it explains alot when trying to figure out the motivations of the left. I can sum this up by saying that the left believes that they care about you and I so much, and the future of mankind, that they can justify anything they do and convince themselves that it was ok, because it was all in the name of the greater cause. It doesnt matter who gets hurt or what the actual consequences of their actions were, it was for the greater good and their intentions are what mattered.
The truth is far different, and we all know this. The left is driven by a hatred of our culture and a hatred of anyone who disagrees with them. Probably because they know they have sold their souls to the devil and they figure we should all be willing to do the same thing, but I digress.
There are many examples from which to draw from that illustrate the lefts hatred for America, and well just plain goodness; but nothing, and I mean nothing demonstrates this more than their hatred of gun owners. We are what is wrong with America, and we are standing in the way of their precious utopia with our “gun rights.” They know of course that as long as we are armed they will not be able to subjugate us, so they began the humiliation campaigns in order to demonize us, and it didn’t work. They tried fear tactics, and it didn’t work; in fact, the more violence America witnesses, the more they resort to arming themselves because we all know the government can’t protect everyone. I have never been able to figure out why the left is so intent on taking our guns away while radical jihadists are beheading people in our country.
In what appears to be an act of plain desperation, the left, and this has got to represent the fringe element of the gun control crowd, has resorted to a new tactic. They intend to call the police whenever they see a law abiding citizen openly carrying a firearm and falsely reporting that the individual is threatening people. This is the result of the left’s efforts to demonize gun owners, and to draw a mental association between guns and mass violence. The radical left is now willing to see us shot to death simply because we are legally carrying a firearm. This truly represents the height of liberal stupidity because they are essentially resorting to the type of violent behavior they claim to be so against, but its all for the greater good, right? Liberal radio show host Mike Malloy has advocated for the same thing. He says he wants people openly carrying firearms to be shot in the head. Its truly amazing that they cant see the forest for the trees. Its just as Alinsky describes though, they hate us so much they are willing to sell out their own convictions if it means eliminating us from society.
Well, they must have been real happy to hear of the shooting death of an innocent man simply carrying a bb gun around a Walmart, an unopened bb gun at that. Ronald Ritchie called police and told them that the man was threatening people with the unopened bb gun and as a result the local SWAT team responded and shot the man dead without even wondering about the unopened bb gun, they just shot first and asked questions. According to special prosecutor Mark Piepmeier, the shooting was justified despite the fact the man did nothing wrong because the SWAT team is trained to deal with mass shootings.
Ronald Ritchie should be tried on a wrongful death suit at the very least, and he probably should be charged with murder. He knew the man was posing a threat to no one and was likely carrying out the plan described above. This is nothing more than madness based on lies and misconceptions sprung about by people with a darker agenda. Anyone recruited to help the left achieve its gun control goals are nothing more than Lenin’s useful idiots because they are essentially helping create a more helpless as opposed to a more safe, society.
I wonder if the death of innocent people contributes to the greater good?
One thought on “Alinsky Morality and Gun Control”
Referencing left/right, conservative/liberal paradigm is a great way to find out just how awake someone really is. Same as political party affiliation. All it does is distract you from the reality that BOTH parties are actively killing and enslaving you and you are dumb enough to choose which one you like better? F’g retards