Published on Jul 8, 2016 by TheCulvernater
hoax!! CNN slips up!! Dallas shooting! “we dont know how many actors are involved!
Posted: July 8, 2016
Categories: Videos
From the Trenches World Report
Enforce our Bill of Rights
From the Trenches World Report
Enforce our Bill of Rights
Published on Jul 8, 2016 by TheCulvernater
hoax!! CNN slips up!! Dallas shooting! “we dont know how many actors are involved!
GEORGE MUST BE SO PROUD!!!!!!!!
“Don’t know how many actors are involved.”
They’re WAY past subtlety these days. Must be almost time. WAY overdue!
tick, tock, tick, tock…
I heard someone say one time that this is common language (actors) to refer to the people involved in a situation.
Not sure if this is right or not, I can’t verify it.
Actor is a generic term for an entity. It is used in modeling terminology.
This is helpful info..
It is but words can be used to deceive.
liberties
1
: the quality or state of being free: a : the power to do as one pleases
can also be seen as
2
a : a right or immunity enjoyed by prescription or by grant : privilege b : permission
are you FREE or do have LIBERTY
Hmm..after re-reading my post, I realize it could be taken multiple ways. By modeling…I meant process, data, scenario modeling. An actor could be a person, place or thing. The term is used to abstract an entities context.
The thing that I have not heard anyone relating to this event is the obvious report about the hacked Twitter conversations between BLM leader and activists discussing direction from lorretta lynch to disrupt conventions so martial law could be declared and Obama could become dictator.
“Don’t know how many actors are involved”.
Hahahahaha!!! Oh man, this is classic.
Did anyone happen to think about how the so called shooter/shooters that were highly prepared for this ambush. Happened to know the route of the protest since it was never published. the only ones who actually would know the route would have been the BLM leaders the police and city hall itself so how could the gunmen know just where to setup for a perfect ambush scenario so in my opinion it was either a false flag or the police were led there and not by accident
I’m not saying these were not actors, yet I’ve noticed they throw the word “actor” around alot, and knowing what we know about false flags it’s a bad word to use.
Actor- “one who participates in a situation.”
I first heard the term actor associated to incident in psycho government world when I saw the first so called training exercises on television. I guess using the terminology would allow them every Freudian slip, that is, if there has ever been a real incident that has been shown in the mainstream.
“Infinitely malleable,” comes to mind.
WHICH IS THE SAME THING AS “AN ETERNAL BEATING”?
Is this what’s called regime change where instead of two opposing sides, one of the two is actually three?
Seriously? The use of the word “actors” is considered a slip-up that exposes the shootings as a hoax?
I suggest that anyone who thinks that immediately look up the various meanings of “actor” in a dictionary.
There’s no need to automatically assume that EVERY incident like this is a hoax. Believe me, I’m the last person to deny that governments do such things. But grasping at straws whenever some pigs get wasted, hoping to prove that it didn’t really happen, is actually a form of (unintentional) defeatism. It implies that the pigs and other such scum can never face consequences for their crimes. It’s a way of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
By all means, when there’s real evidence of a false flag, it should be posted for consideration. But let’s not throw away Occam’s razor, either. Sometimes things really are as they seem.
It still looks to me like the pigs truly did get some schooling the other night. What’s far more questionable is whether they actually learned anything. I doubt it. But I’m still going to celebrate this weekend.
Paging the produce manager to aisle one.
We have a slips ups and fall by a CNN newscaster by the cucumbers section.
We need immediate assistance to aisle #1.
Attention..
Paging loss prevention and damage control managers to aisle #1.
We seem to have a newly unemployed CNN newscaster that has slipped on a banana peel by the cucumbers.
He just keeps mumbling some stupid shit about contacting…
Stein and Spielberg and hands me a business card.
Here is a quote from Title 2C, NJ Criminal law:
2C:1-14. Definitions.
2C:1-14. In this code, unless a different meaning plainly is required:
a. “Statute” includes the Constitution and a local law or ordinance of a political subdivision of the State;
b. “Act” or “action” means a bodily movement whether voluntary or involuntary;
c. “Omission” means a failure to act;
d. “Conduct” means an action or omission and its accompanying state of mind, or, where relevant, a series of acts and omissions;
e. “Actor” includes, where relevant, a person guilty of an omission;
f. “Acted” includes, where relevant, “omitted to act”;
g. “Person,” “he,” and “actor” include any natural person and, where relevant, a corporation or an unincorporated association;
As you see, the “perepetrator” or “do-er” or “defendant” fits in with that legal definition of “actor” and that term is used in lots of the individual statutes use that term, like this excerpt from 2c:2-3:
“e. When causing a particular result is a material element of an offense for which absolute liability is imposed by law, the element is not established unless the actual result is a probable consequence of the actor’s conduct.”
Because the term is used in NJ criminal law, the police just tend to use it in their reports and news releases. Lots of states that use the “model; penal code” as the basis for their crimnal law use the word “actor” a lot.
Thanks, this is helpful.
There is an Actors Studio in Denver, and i have seen their ads on Craigslist. Crisis Actors is what it was under.
Real or promulgated there is no way for us to know unless we are physically there and see what is going on with our own two eyes. We know they’ve faked a lot of these incidents and right on queue the Communists are clambering to take more of our rights what few we have left. Best thing for us to do money permitting is to clear the shelves of what we’re going to need for what is coming when the other proverbial shoe drops.
Header says 3 in custody
We’re being told “lone gun man”
So , can’t have both , which is it ?
Probably neither , cause it was their own ” actors “
When did the world change from using the word assailant to the word actor? I remember first hearing the term “bad actor” in the late 90s in reference to battlefield combatants. Now the word has been proliferated throughout all reports on anyone acting against the state. Was this change made to confuse the situation so we wouldn’t know if things were ‘real world” or “exercise”?