Uploaded on Sep 11, 2011 by FacelesswithEyesOpen
Originally published in March 2007
General Wesley Clark:
Because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, “Sir, you’ve got to come in and talk to me a second.” I said, “Well, you’re too busy.” He said, “No, no.” He says, “We’ve made the decision we’re going to war with Iraq.” This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, “We’re going to war with Iraq? Why?” He said, “I don’t know.” He said, “I guess they don’t know what else to do.” So I said, “Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?” He said, “No, no.” He says, “There’s nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq.” He said, “I guess it’s like we don’t know what to do about terrorists, but we’ve got a good military and we can take down governments.” And he said, “I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail.”
So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, “Are we still going to war with Iraq?” And he said, “Oh, it’s worse than that.” He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, “I just got this down from upstairs” — meaning the Secretary of Defense’s office — “today.” And he said, “This is a memo that describes how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.” I said, “Is it classified?” He said, “Yes, sir.” I said, “Well, don’t show it to me.” And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, “You remember that?” He said, “Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you!”
This plan to take down seven countries in five years was known many years ago. The lie is that we’re doing it for oil, because that’s more acceptable to the American public than the truth, which is that we’re doing it for Israel.
“Confessions of an Economic Hitman” was already on the bestseller list. They were exposing to the public the fact that we’re an empire, and trying to get them used to the idea, but in reality, we were helping to secure “greater Israel”, which extends from the Nile to the Euphrates.
We didn’t get any oil from the mid-east wars. It all went to Israel and China, and now they’re taking our oil, too.
Jolly Roger is correct. This plot to overthrow all these countries was intended to benefit Israel at US expense, although myriad “defense” contractors also got a windfall. “War for oil” was a politically correct fallback explanation.
Most people who haven’t had their heads up their asses for 15 years (sadly, that’s a minority of Americans) are aware of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) think tank and its “A Clean Break” report. It’s freely available online. Most of its authors were Jews, and all of them Zionists.
Less well-known is a 2002 paper by Paul Eidelberg, a dual-citizen Jew associated with an Israeli think tank called the Ariel Center for Policy Research. This paper, entitled “Democratizing Islam,” reveals cultural motivations for war complementary to the strategic goals of the PNAC authors. From the abstract:
*** “Democratizing Islam” shows that “Islamic fundamentalism” or “Islamism” is in fact authentic Islam – the Islam of Muhammad. To democratize Islam it will be necessary for the United States to conquer Iraq and other Islamic regimes and maintain an occupation force for two or three decades, as was done in post-war Japan and Germany. ***
Let that second sentence sink in for a moment.
*** A generation of Muslim children will have to be re-educated. Anti-Jewish and anti-Christian verses in the Qur`an should be neutralized by contrary verses and commentaries. The principle of Jihad must be eliminated from the four schools of Islamic law. Islamic regimes must abide by the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality.
Non-Arab states should follow the example of Turkey and remove Arabic from public documents and public education and establish their native language as the only official language of the state. This will diminish pan-Arab as well as pan-Islamic sentiments.
Various Islamic concepts such as “consultation” and “consensus” should be reinterpreted to prescribe a non-secular constitutional democracy. Civil society and political institutions must be developed to counter the authoritarian tendencies of Islamic culture. A market economy conducive to the formation of a middle class will hasten this development.
Decentralization of power is essential. In Islamic countries with large ethnic minorities, it will be necessary to establish a federal system of government based on territoriality. Bicameral legislatures should be established to protect minorities.
Israel can facilitate the democratization of Islam by adopting a model constitution based on Jewish principles. To be true to its heritage, Israel should avoid diplomatic relations with any evil regime. It should call for the expulsion from the UN of any state that violates the democratic provisions of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. By its behavior, Israel’s government should set an example to mankind. ***
http://strategic-israel-articles.org/pp/pp141xs.htm
A link to the full article text can also be found at the bottom of the page linked above.
Please spread this and the PNAC paper “A Clean Break” to anyone with a brain and an open mind. Many will reject it angrily, but there are some whose eyes will be opened, and every one of them counts.
No Rothschild central bank means Israel’s lap dog, the US, must go take out their gov.
“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”
-The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.