Governments and corporations around the world seem to indicate that mankind has arrived at historic crossroads. While we would certainly welcome such a development we would also like to, first, test the accuracy of this assumption. Whether or not it is based on a foundation that reality and society provide at this very moment.
One realistic and efficient way to do so is by introducing two solutions for what is unilaterally being pushed upon the international community and the planet: the launching and putting into orbit of up to 25,000 satellites, as the space-based backbone of a global internet communication system. To realize a global “5G grid”.
- SpaceX (Starlink): 4425 + 7518 = 11,943
- OneWeb: 1972 + 600+ = 2,572+
- Boeing: 2,956
- Telesat: 117
- Samsung: 4,600
- LeoSat: 108
- Roscosmos: 640
- LinkSure (free (??) internet globally provided by the Chinese government): 272
- + Unreported and unconfirmed plans and launches
Total: 23,208+ satellites in initial launches with a lifespan of up to only 7 years per satellite.
Unilaterally by governments and corporations and, thus, without the consent of the public and without, in most cases, the public even being aware of it.
No corporation, no collective of corporations and no agency – including the US FCC and the UN’s International Telecommunication Union – are in any way authorized to act on behalf of the entire population of planet Earth. There exists no corporate or other form of ownership, there exists no representation, acknowledged by the public at large, that would even suggest that the above listed corporations and agencies in any way have been granted permission by the public at large to ‘regulate’ and execute the said launches and the exploitation of said spacecraft.
Planet Earth is the home of nearly 8 billion people and a handful of corporations and agencies can’t, therefore, just decide on their own terms that they have the right, let alone the support, to fundamentally and permanently alter our planet and the space it exists in.
If we are to assume that indeed humanity has evolved enough to start to consider implementing said space-based internet communication system then it must also be so that we have evolved enough to organize extensive public debate about said communication system BEFORE it gets built and activated. At least this much should be expected of a species that has evolved, allegedly, far enough.
For this reason we introduce the following two solutions for the unilaterally announced space-based internet communication system.
1. Not a Priority: Postpone Indefinitely
By any reasonable standards the launching of said satellites and the construction of said communication system is not a priority at all.
It is very easy to confirm this, while we also assume that humanity has allegedly evolved enough to make such decisions.
A species that has evolved enough, that has acquired enough knowledge and wisdom, would certainly not have said program as its priority when:
- There are still 736 million people, globally, living on less than US$1.90 a day (World Bank, 2015). Of the 736 million, 413 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa are living on less than US$1.90 a day and if the trend continues, by 2030, nearly 9 out of 10 extreme poor will be in Sub-Saharan Africa (World Bank, 2015).
- An estimated 2.5 billion people lack access to improved sanitation (more than 35% of the world’s population) (US CDC).
- Millions of people are being slaughtered in wars of which about 400,000 in Syria alone in recent years.
- 115 million youths, globally, are considered illiterate (UNICEF, 2019).
- Around a quarter of the world’s urban population lives in slums (squatter areas) – from 689 million in 1990 to 880 million in 2014 (UN).
While there are also worrying implications that would certainly come with the construction and activation of said space-based communication system the reality is that none of the above problems are being addressed by said communication system. At least that is what we can assume from the non-existing reports and literature on these issues.
On the contrary, said communication system would only widen the gap between poor and rich since hundreds of billions of dollars would be invested in infrastructure that does not alleviate any of the mentioned problems and, thus, would in the end only generate substantial profits for those who provide the credit that corporations and governments need to implement the global 5G and 6G grid.
2. An Omnicratic Framework
Omnicracy: “Equal Power of All, Over All that Concerns the Fundamental Interests of All.”
Assuming that humanity has evolved enough to make decisions that can alleviate all the above listed problems and that we have evolved enough to have a decent global debate about a space-based communication system then at this point we also have to assume that the next step includes the organizing of such a debate BEFORE anyone continues with their plans for said communication system.
Since the deployment of, initially, up to 25,000 satellites – orbiting at altitudes between roughly 350 km and 1,500 km – would certainly have a lasting and growing impact on society and the planet, which both are considered “fundamental interests of all”, the only civilized thing to do right now is to involve everyone in the debate in order to enable everyone to have their voices heard and their interests represented and defended.
The average person is not aware of what the suggested space-based communication system includes, what it can enable and who is to be in control of it.
The communication system is considered a space-based backbone of what is popularly referred to as 5G and 6G, while the average person does not understand what 5G stands for.
Focusing on the proposed satellites alone, few of the public, relatively speaking, even know that these would be brought into orbit, let alone how many and what their capabilities are – since very little technical information is being provided by the corporations that seek to launch them and by governments who are supposed to find out and report about it.
Except for the manufacturers no one really knows what capabilities these satellites have. It is claimed that they are for peaceful purposes, i.e communication. But how is one to confirm that this is actually the full truth?
When the public is not being properly informed by these corporations who seek to deploy said satellites or their governments, why would the public just trust anything at all of what is being claimed by any party in these matters?
When we focus on the health implications that 5G and 6G come with then we can assume with great certainty that there exists more research and documentation that warns about and that confirms dangers to humans their health, the health of animals and plants, thus, the environment as a whole. The few instances where “research” seems to indicate that 5G and 6G are perfectly safe for everyone and everything concern research that has been funded by the industry itself, by interests that want to advance the space-based communication system without properly informing and involving the public at large.
If we are to continue with the construction of the space-based communication system and the implementation of 5G, for now, and 6G, eventually, then we can only do so in a civilized fashion. This means that we have to go beyond the point where also the UN has once again failed the public, since also this institution is not representing and defending the fundamental interests of all.
The fact that Telesat and OneWeb have “already won priority ITU rights” for their own satellites in different parts of the world (Fortune.com, September 26, 2017) shows, indeed, how the UN operates outside of the public’s consent and knowledge. Everything, so far, has been decided by ‘the few’ who at the same time don’t indicate to have any concerns about the public’s safety, security and their other rights such as privacy and the right to self-determination.
The only way that all of this is going to work properly is when the space-based communication system, 5G and 6G are being operated in an omnicratic framework.
This means that all information has to be made available to the public, in as far as said system is for communication purposes. There where it is not, where it is to be used for military or intelligence operations, it should be clearly and fully stated as such without any exceptions.
Operating these systems in an omnicratic framework means that BEFORE further implementations are executed we must address all implications, healthwise and others. Including but not limited to privacy, security and other human rights.
When we focus on security there exist no guarantees, that the public is aware of, that any parts of the space-based communication system and the Earth-based systems can not get compromised during acts of war, hacking or virus infections.
We have witnessed the power of viruses like Stuxnet and one can only imagine what can go wrong if any part of the space-based communication system and/or Earth-based systems gets infected. Who is to be held accountable? How can, in this context, things go wrong and how wrong can they go? Have any tests been done in this context? If so, what are the results of such tests?
Sending up to 25,000 satellites into orbit (that by the way need to be replaced every 5 to 7 years) without knowing what can go wrong and to what extent is simply insane!
Who is testing and confirming that none of the components that these satellites hold are manufactured with secret backdoors incorporated into them? Can anyone ever guarantee this? If not, how is it responsible to send up such a vast number of possibly easy to hijack spacecraft? Even one such satellite that is compromised can already cause geopolitical instability. Who is to be held accountable for that?
As you can see, the questions are numerous while the answers are scarce.
The creation of an omnicratic framework is therefore the first and only priority if we are to continue the construction and activation of this system, including 5G and 6G.
This omnicratic framework must be made up of committees and councils on the local levels (at least on city level) and national levels where everything about these systems is discussed BEFORE we continue in any direction.
People have to first find out and understand what the health implications are of 5G and 6G and, if any, of the space-based communication system. People must be given the opportunity to vote for or against the implementation of 5G and 6G devices in their communities and the construction and activation of the space-based communication system.
People have to find out and understand how and to what extent their rights are going to be compromised once the 5G, and 6G, grid goes fully online and when the space-based communication system is activated.
People have to find out who will be in control of said space-based system.
It is suggested that every year new councils are formed that will oversee said communication system. Councils where independent experts monitor the systems and report about it in order to keep the public properly informed about everything that concerns the Earth-based and space-based systems.
In an omnicratic framework people have the right and realistic possibility to opt out of anything that has to do with said space-based, 5G and 6G systems. Meaning that an individual and a community must both have the reasonable ability to not be exposed to anything that is used in/by/for the space-based and Earth-based systems. This includes any form of radiation.
Anything less is a step towards a global techno dictatorship.
Unless we start to create this framework in the spirit of Aldo Capitini’s omnicracy the only sane alternative is to indefinitely postpone the entire project as stated in the first solution.
Signed,
Concerned people of planet Earth
Written by Koen Germain Jacobs
Man! Crazy stuff.
Skynet will be operational soon. Has John Conner been born yet?
Opt out.That’s a good one!! 🙂
That way, the “AI enhanced” psycho elites can have their own “Skynet” and become what in Noah’s day were part-human part-robot “giants” (see Genesis 6) or “nephilim” type post-humans to do there desired destruction of all humanity (because these people hate humanity! Even if they were never bullied in HS) and then, after they destroy all animal and plant life as well, they can live underground in their cutesy wootsey bunkers. “Terminator”? Maybe. “World Without End” (an early 60s post-nuclear-war-dystopian-future movie)? Definitely.
LOL……….
OOOOOOOOOOKKKKKKKK