This is urgent news regarding a leaked document obtained by the NRA which states in a memo that the DOJ is calling for an all out gun confiscation and outlawing of firearms. This comes just months before Jade Helm 15, the drill that is sweeping the nation, also which happens to be the “drill” where there will be agenturs among civilians. In the coming days with Jade Helm 15 Freedom Fighter Reports received a tip from our military source about the true meaning of the Jade Helm Drill:
“…DIA that we will be invaded by ISIS, Iran, and their allies. I was looking at the original map for the Jade Helm mission. It looks as to me that the map is on the southern border because that is where we are going to be invaded. It’s not military exercises, it’s an excuse to use that part of the country to fight back. The military and government know that an invasion is near, and they’re just getting ready. Pretty soon you will start to hear talk about Iran taking over Israel, and possible invasions from the southern border. The map and mission are a distraction. The real reason Jade Helm is there is so they can literally, start a civil war with whom ever is going to invade. One things for sure, Texas, Southern California, New Mexico, and Arizona better get ready for a war.”
In order to fully grasp how this could take place please look at the compiled map below of the latest Jade Helm locations, Feds taking over police stations, and ISIS threats. There is an odd pattern that can be seen. That pattern is basically beginning in the South and progressing all over the entire nation like a virus. The coming Martial Law, is simply one executive order away. The NRA’s obtained memo shows just how close the world is to the brink of Martial Law and a Civil War.
Leaked DOJ Document
The National Rifle Association has obtained a Department of Justice memo calling for national gun registration and confiscation. The nine page “cursory summary” on current gun control initiatives was not officially released by the Obama administration.
The DOJ memo states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.
The memo stands in stark contrast to the administration’s public stance on so-called gun control. White House spokesman Jay Carney said last month that laws proposed by Obama would not “take away a gun from a single law-abiding American.”
Eric Holder
The NRA declined to explain how it obtained the document. The memo was written by the acting director of the Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice, Greg Ridgeway. It is dated January 4, two weeks before Obama mounted his attack on the Second Amendment following the Sandy Hook massacre. Ridgeway came to the Justice Department from the RAND corporation.
The memo says universal background checks on firearms purchases may help the government push to control and eventually outlaw firearms, but it would lead to an increase in illegally purchased guns.
DOJ memo states: “Buybacks are ineffective unless massive and coupled with a ban.”
DOJ memo states: “Buybacks are ineffective unless massive and coupled with a ban.”
It pointed out that banning high capacity ammunition clips would be ineffective due to the fact there is a large number of them already in circulation.
A Justice Department official said the memo is an unfinished review of gun violence research and does not represent administration policy.
The DOJ memo arrived a few weeks prior to a letter sent out by the Department of Veterans Affairs. “A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition,” the sent to military veterans states. “If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub.L.No. 103-159, as implemented at 18, United States Code 924(a)(2).”
“US veterans are receiving letters from the government informing them that they are disabled and not allowed to own, purchase or possess a firearm. If the veteran does decide to purchase a firearm he will by fined, imprisoned or both,” the Gateway Pundit remarked. Continue reading by Kurt Nimmo via Infowars…
I have a good question
What if ol HNIC calls for ML and none of the citizens ,or say a healthy amout of us say aw hell no? What than ?
“Obama would not “take away a gun from a single law-abiding American.”
“You can keep your doctor”
“You can keep your health plan ”
Anyone that doesn’t understand that this guys plan IS war , needs a good wake up call
I think this article is a complete BS distraction that plays upon Americans’ gun confiscation fears.
How the hell is anyone, or any army going to confiscate a billion guns? They won’t even be able to find half of them, and they’re going to be shot to pieces if they try.
The military and government know that an invasion is near, and they’re just getting ready. This statement, for me, caused the article to fall apart. The reason there would be an invasion is due to not securing the borders in the first place. We already have an invasion of illegals that were escorted in across the borders, given housing, money, etc.. This is ridiculous.
First of all, it cannot be a civil war if its an invasion. Second, There are reports that ISIS is already training in the US (CIA creation). Third, there is no way that they can do any confiscation unless the entire communication systems went down. The first sign of confiscation would start a civil war. Fourth, the military is not large enough to pull it off. Even if the Chinese and Russians joined it couldnt happen. Jade Helm may be a ploy to start the war. Rumors are that they might be training to arrest politicians who have broken the public trust and violated the law of the land. As for the Brady bill, “any law repugnant to the constitution is null and void” (Marbury vs Madison) and I wouldnt expect any veterans to give up their rights because some bureaucrats wish it so
Yep good analysis, Bill.