Navy Yard Shooting Proof? The “Iconic Photo” Not Actually From Shooting Event! False Flag Hoax


Published on Sep 19, 2013 by The Paulstal Service

The Navy Yard Shooting so far has provided ZERO evidence there actually was any sort of shooting in the building. There are cameras all over this particular piece of real-estate which should show EXACTLY what happened inside the building- yet these have never been shown, or talked about or even mentioned on the media.

If the talking heads on the media admitted there were cameras not only all over the exterior of this building, but also all over the interior, the American people might start asking annoying questions like: “Can We See The Film?”

“Can We See the Film” is a question the people staging these events do not want asked.. ever.

Where are all the videos and photos from people who were inside the building from their cell-phone cameras?

Are people inside this building allowed to bring shotguns into their first day at work, but not allowed to bring in cell-phones?

The AR-15 Myth has now been completely rescinded by the media (not covered in this video) which begs the question: Why was the media parroting that an AR-15 had been used over, and over, and over again, if in fact that actually never happened? We even had FrankenFeinstein talking about getting rid of AR-15s before any investigation had started.

The “Iconic” picture of a man laying down, being helped, with military personnel in front of the CVS Pharmacy that time and time again was said to have been “1 Block Away from the Shooting” was in fact 4 blocks away from the “shooting”- a “minor mistake”.. yet, later, it turned out this man lying on the ground actually had nothing to do with the Navy Yard Shooting- further reducing the amount of photo “evidence” any sort of shooting event actually happened.

The fact that that particular photo was unrelated did little to deter Mainstream media from airing it over and over again, and the online “news” sites from showing as some sort of proof of a shooting-

The “iconic” image of the man laying down with caution tape being strung up was provided by non other than a government “Communications Director” working for Representative Steven Horsford – a Rep. who of course “Supports restrictions on gun purchases.”

Conveniently, helicopters removed the “victims” from the scene- “victims” who don’t appear to be injured, or be bloody at all.. one guy smiling as he’s being bucketed up.

So, not only was the most “iconic” image from “shooting scene” proven not to be one block away as reported (actually 4 blocks) and not actually part of the shooting- and the AR-15 not actually used in the shooting either (makes you wonder how they got that wrong) Nobody shown leaving the scene in a helicopter appears to be injured, and no images cell-phone, surveillance or otherwise have been mentioned to exist or released to the public.

Compare this event, and the recent “super shooter” events to Columbine: At Columbine there was volumes of security film, hundreds of images of obviously injured people, and news crews were showing injured falling out of windows and running away. Yet, as technology has gotten more advanced in 2013, on a military installation full of cameras covering multiple angles and people having cell-phone cameras on most phones- proof of a shooter event amazingly doesn’t exist.

We have staffers of a Rep. who wants gun control supplying photos not related to the shooting as proof being re-uploaded across all news agencies- yet the follow-up explaining how these photos are unrelated to the alleged shooting never seems to make the air.

The Story of the Viral Navy Yard Shooting Photo That Wasn’t (The Atlantic Wire):
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/nation…

AP’s Navy Yard photos unrelated to shooting? D.C. man who says he was in them tells his story
http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/me…

From the Above Link: ”

When James Birdsall arrived with his AED, “It became pretty evident that he was shot,” he said. “He had an entry wound on the left side of his face.”

A spokesperson for George Washington University Hospital told journalists Monday that, “This injury was not survivable by any stretch,” a hospital official told reporters. “The patient was dead on the way to the hospital.”

Since there were no other shootings nor murders that morning excepting for those that took place at the Navy Yard, the “wounded” man on the ground was a “victim” of the Navy Yard incident.

Looks like we caught AP a willing participant in a badly staged false flag operation!

Ladies and gentlemen, the myth of a free press is just that…a myth. Governments can’t allow for a free press, for obvious reasons. YOU have to do your own research in order to learn the truth. And any politician that mimics the press’ lies, must be defeated at the next election…that politician can’t be trusted.

Let this incident be your wake up call.”

2 thoughts on “Navy Yard Shooting Proof? The “Iconic Photo” Not Actually From Shooting Event! False Flag Hoax

  1. “If the talking heads on the media admitted there were cameras not only all over the exterior of this building, but also all over the interior, the American people might start asking annoying questions like: “Can We See The Film?”

    “Can We See the Film” is a question the people staging these events do not want asked.. ever.

    Where are all the videos and photos from people who were inside the building from their cell-phone cameras?”

    Twilight Zone theme, please.

    Sand Hoax revisited.

    No bodies.

    No blood.

    All we have is THEIR word for it that there was a shooting that day.

    1. Yeppy. It’s pretty odd that we can get picks from the mall shooting in fricken Kenya in almost real time…
      But we still can’t get any picks from the Navy yard shooting.
      Or the Sandy Hook school shooting.
      Or the Batman shooting in Aurora.
      I guess the CCTV cameras in Africa work way better than the ones we have here in America…

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*