Prescriptions for painkillers in the United States have nearly tripled in the past two decades and fatal overdoses reached epidemic levels, exceeding those from heroin and cocaine combined, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
At the same time, the first-ever global analysis of illicit drug abuse, published this month in the British medical journal The Lancet, found that addictions to heroin and popular painkillers, including Vicodin and OxyContin, kill the most people and cause the greatest health burden, compared with illicit drugs such as marijuana and cocaine.
High-income nations, such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia, had the highest rates of abuse, 20 times greater than in the least affected countries, according to the Lancet study.
In the United States, enough painkillers were prescribed in 2010 to medicate every American adult around the clock for one month.
Dr. Andrew Kolodny, president of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing, told Al Jazeera that the U.S. is facing a dangerous epidemic of overdoses and addictions related to painkillers. “According to the CDC, this is the worst drug epidemic in U.S. history,” he said. “CDC has data demonstrating that around the same time doctors began aggressively prescribing these medications in the late 1990s, there have been parallel increases in rates of addiction.”
The Food and Drug Administration, Kolodny said, is “failing miserably” at curbing the epidemic.
“The way to turn this epidemic around is for doctors to prescribe painkillers more cautiously,” he said. But that can only happen, Kolodny said, when the FDA changes labeling requirements for painkillers, “making it easier for medical schools and the larger medical community to prescribe these meds more cautiously.” He called current FDA-approved labeling “very broad,” because the drugs have no suggested maximum dose or suggested duration of use.
Kolodny is part of a group of health officials who signed a citizens’ petition (PDF) in 2012 urging the FDA to change labeling requirements on how and when doctors should prescribe painkillers. The group called on the FDA to limit the drugs’ approved use to those suffering from “severe” pain, as opposed to the current FDA-approved standard of “moderate to severe pain.”
FDA spokeswoman Morgan Liscinsky, however, said that prescription painkillers are an important component of modern pain management. The FDA, she said, is working to balance the dual responsibility of addressing misuse, abuse and addiction with continuing to ensure appropriate access to effective pain management for patients who need these medications.
The FDA “is extremely concerned about the inappropriate use” of painkillers, she said, “which has become a major public health challenge for our nation,” and the agency “is committed to ongoing efforts to address the problem and supports broader initiatives to address this public health problem, including regulatory, educational and scientific activities.”
But according to Kolodny, the notion that there are two different groups of people using painkillers — those who need them and those who abuse them — is a false dichotomy. “The bulk of these prescriptions are unnecessary and can lead to addiction,” he said. “Painkillers in many cases are actually ineffective in treating long-term pain.”
Nevada state Sen. Richard Segerblom, a longtime backer of efforts to curb prescription drug abuse, told Al Jazeera that the overprescribing of painkillers is the equivalent of “legalized heroin.” One of the dangers of physicians recklessly prescribing painkillers, he said, is that once patients are taken off the medication, some of them turn to heroin, a cheaper alternative with similar effects.
Nevada had the third-highest rate of prescription-drug overdose deaths in 2008, according to a 2013 CDC report. The same report found that in 2010, the state was tied for second among states in the amount of prescription painkillers sold per 10,000 people.
Segerblom, a Democrat, was behind a controversial bill introduced in February that would have allowed patients addicted to painkillers to sue their doctors and the drugmaker for the cost of rehabilitation programs. “Reckless doctors and drugmakers should pay the consequences for dangerous overprescribing,” he said.
Although the bill failed to pass, Segerblom said the attempt garnered “a lot of publicity” and helped to raise awareness.
A global problem
The study published in The Lancet examined four categories of illegal drugs — opioids (which include painkillers and heroin), cocaine, amphetamines and cannabis.
Worldwide, of the estimated 78,000 deaths in 2010 stemming from illicit drug use, more than half were due to opioid addictions. More than two-thirds of addicts were male, and rates of abuse were highest in men ages 20 to 29.
The United States consumes 80 percent of the world’s supply of painkillers, according to 2011 congressional testimony from the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians.
A Los Angeles Times article in August revealed that the maker of OxyContin, Purdue Pharma LP, had been compiling a database for the past decade of some 1,800 doctors suspected of recklessly prescribing the painkiller. Shortly after the article was published, Segerblom asked the Connecticut-based company to turn over information on Nevada doctors suspected of overprescribing the painkiller, information that would be used by the state medical board in any potential investigation.
Representatives from the company met with state health officials Aug. 29 and supplied the names of 29 doctors, according to Segerblom.
“The epidemic is getting worse, and it’s not going away anytime soon,” he said. “I think the states are working hard at finding solutions, and we’ll keep pushing for them.”
Al Jazeera
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2013/8/29/painkiller-kill-morepeoplethanmarijuanause.html
As all here would squeal, PROPAGANDA, if certain
sources were quoted here…like say, msnbc, splc, dnc, al sharpton’s garbage, as being accurate or true.
But for the life of me, why do we post anything, regardless whether they may be accurate or not, from sources such as al jazeerza or RT.
We may as well be posting news from abortionist’s point of views, and the likes of Tokyo sue,
jane fonda, and poetate from splc.
Free speech is one thing, but to give credibility to the enemy…..come on now ….
I remember Hillary saying, “al jazeera is the best
news source and that she watches it all the time.”
Why don’t we let jay carney, sam donaldson, bill ayers, and obummer himself write, and post, their opinions too, while we’re at it.
I wouldn’t presume to tell Henry what to do with HIS site, but I think we should be very careful which sources that’s considered …that’s all….One should NEVER give ones enemy any credibility……EVER.
Something to think about and to consider ………
Paraclete,
We post a lot of mainstream PROPAGANDA, the idea being to show it to be PROPAGANDA, which has worked quite well to destroy the credibility of the mainstream PROPAGANDISTS.
In your comment, you did not point out any PROPAGANDA, inaccuracies, lies, deceit within the article, you just attacked the source. We discuss the articles to arrive at the truth.
Al Jazeera definitely puts out PROPAGANDA, as do the other PROPAGANDA agencies you mentioned.
#1 wanted to talk about the assertions in the article, as many others like to talk about the assertions in many other articles coming out of the PROPAGANDA ministry.
We put up articles on an article to article basis. If we just stopped putting up articles from any given source and every one else did the same, the PROPAGANDA would go unchallenged. Don’t you think?
Yes, well put.
thanks ……….
Again, thanks Henry.
I would just like to add this:
Paraclete, when I sent this in to Henry, I specifically pointed out to him that it was from Al Jazeera. Do you deny that prescription drugs are an epidemic in this country, or that they kill more people every year than the other drugs mentioned (although mentioning pot in that context is OBVIOUSLY b.s)? That was the main theme of the article, and much of it is true. I was willing to overlook the minor propaganda aspect in light of that.
Or is it your contention that I am deliberately posting disinfo in an effort to decieve my friends here at FTT? Because if that’s the case, then we DEFINITELY have a serious problem.
No, what I’ve said has NO reflection on you.
Draw back your claws ………
Through out the history of warfare, propaganda
has always been used to demoralize or misinform.
Regardless whether the content was true or accurate.
The issue is; using any form of information that’s been created by one’s enemies. You know the old adage about the ‘camels nose’ ?
Once a source becomes accepted, it’s easy over time, for opinions to be reshaped without one
noticing. Gradualism…….So it would be safer to
not to even use it. I stopped having anything to
do with the MSM, local and national, 22 + years
ago, as many folks have. Sources such as aj or
rt and many others should only be shunned.
Unless the point being made is to discredit them.
Which, by the way, why even bother ?
So the best way to ascertain our enemy’s intentions and motivations is to completely ignore all of their lies and propaganda, rather than post them here to be dissected by everyone? In case you haven’t noticed, we have some very astute, highly intelligent, and VERY well informed posters here, and I’m proud of the fact that we ALWAYS manage to ferret out any untruthful information posted, among the lot of us.
It’s what we do best.
Yeah, your right…..
We, ( you and I ), know who our enemies are.
But the newbies don’t.
For some reason it irks me to see
a rag head or commie source.
Have you noticed that aj is airing
in country now ?
That’s true, on both accounts. But one of our main objectives here, as I see it, is to educate those newbies as to the nature of the deceptions perpetrated by the enemy. One method of doing so (imo) is to post and then thoroughly debunk their deceptions/propaganda by means of citing proven credible sources, thereby leaving no room for doubt.
As previously stated, we’re exceptionally adept at doing just that.
By aj, I’m assuming you mean the (formerly owned) Arab news agency, as opposed to the Infowars clown? If so, that was to be expected after Al Gore (I believe it was) bought it.
We bother because when we point out the propaganda, more and more people see it as such and its power is exponentially diminished.
This is why I love you people. You are hard headed and think independently. If the enemy only knew what they are facing, they would turn and run in a panic. LOL
Thanks Henry …..
Being a rather heavy contributor
here, I am only driven by my
Passion for what’s right.
I am an eighth gen American.
I’ll be DAMNED if we’re going to
lose this Republic on my watch !
The enemy had better be scared.
I’ll be terminating with extreme prejudice.