Pentagon Goes Barbarian
The Pentagon’s new Law of War Manual – a 1,200-plus page document issued in June by the Defense Department’s Office of the General Counsel – is barbaric.
The Manual is so bad that one of the leading experts on the law of war (Dr. Francis Boyle) – who wrote the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, the American implementing legislation for the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, served on the Board of Directors of Amnesty International, and teaches international law at the University of Illinois, Champaign – says :
This Law of War Manual reduces us to the level of Nazis. There’s no other word for it.
Boyle also says the Manual:
Reads like it was written by Hitler’s Ministry of War.
Why is the Manual so bad?
Manual Authorizes Slaughter of Innocent Civilians
Because – according to Boyle – the Manual allows massacres of civilian populations. The most comprehensive previous such document – the 1956 Pentagon field manual – assumed that any deliberate targeting of civilians was illegal and a war crime.
Reporters Can Be Assassinated
And the Manual treats allows reporters to be treated as “unprivileged combatants”, who can be assassinated.
Boyle points out that this retroactively legalizes assassination of reporters, such as Al Jazeera reporters during Iraq war. Boyle notes that even a SPY would be treated better, and given a trial.
(As we’ve previously noted, the U.S. government treats real reporters as terrorists. Because the core things which reporters do could be considered terrorism, in modern America, journalists are sometimes targeted under counter-terrorism laws.)
Manual Authorizes Barbarous War Crimes
Boyle also says the Manual authorizes the following barbarous war crimes:
(1) Warfare with nuclear weapons. Specifically, the manual states:
There is no general prohibition in treaty or customary international law on the use of nuclear weapons.
This flies in the face of the United Nations Charter, which – as noted by the World Court in its Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons – makes even threatening to use nuclear weapons a war crime.
This is also particularly worrisome because – as documented in
Towards a World War III Scenario, by Michel Chossudovsky – the U.S. is so enamored with nuclear weapons that it has authorized low-level field commanders to use them in the heat of battle in their sole discretion … without any approval from civilian leaders.
2. Depleted uranium. The use of depleted uranium can cause cancer and birth defects for decades (seethis, this, this, this, this and this).
3. Landmines.
4. Cluster bombs.
5. Napalm, which is banned under Protocol III of the 1980 UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.
6. Expanding hollow-point bullets, banned under the 1868 St. Petersburg declaration.
7. Herbicides, like Agent Orange in Vietnam.
The Good News
The good news – according to Dr. Boyle – is that both Congress and the president have power to revoke the Manual.
So – if we stand up and raise holy hell – we might be able to walk back from the fascist path we’re heading down. And we can prove that we’re not the rogue nation that the rest of the world thinks we are.
“Reporters Can Be Assassinated”
You make it sound like that’s a bad thing.
Not to mention it reveals your ignorance…
… the word assassination is reserved for the murder of politicians.
“This Law of War Manual reduces us to the level of Nazis. There’s no other word for it.”
There’s another word for it… BULLSH#T!!!
Hitler did NOT kill German nationals!!!
Try the Bolsheviks, if you want to make a valid comparison.
Agreed #1. The Nazi’s “supposedly” killed 6 million but that pales in comparison the Bolshevik revolution that resulted in, what was it, 60 million? Either way, the Nazi’s were way more convenient to demonize for sympathy once the dust settled from both wars.
We are already a fascist country and have been since 1913, when private industry eloped with government to control the economy.
Jackson is dead as well as Kennedy.
Not sure who remains to take on the money men (ie: Banksters) that control the Gov.
The US is not ‘fascist’ or ‘communist’. The Fabian socialists use whatever flavor of socialism gets the job done for them at that point in time.
National Socialism, Nazi/fascism, was all about building the national economy and national pride of the nation. Is that what we have in the US? NO. We have globalism and a tearing down of national pride and our economy for other nations interests. We have global communism right now. A sharing of our national wealth with the rest of the world.
Earlier in our history we did indeed fall under the category of ‘fascism’. But this changes with the goals of the powers that be.
we have currently,a MONGRELIZED political system
Please give a reference in the Law permitting “Slaughter of Innocent Civilians.”
“The good news – according to Dr. Boyle – is that both Congress and the president have power to revoke the Manual.”
I’m curious. How is that “good news”? They’re both crazy as Hell.
“And the Manual treats allows reporters to be treated as “unprivileged combatants”, who can be assassinated.”
Unprivileged combatants? WTF is that supposed to mean? Sounds like “underprivileged combatants”.
So I guess that means the government is considered “privileged” by We the People who are their employers are “unprivileged”. What’s wrong with that picture?
im an “underpriveliged combatant”. i got a .22,,,,,,,,,a rusty barlow pocket knife and a shi#$$y disposition.