Rep. Jennifer Wexton Hangs Transgender Pride Flag Outside Her Capitol Hill Office

Time

Newly-elected Virginia congresswoman Jennifer Wexton is showing solidarity with the LGBTQ community by hanging a transgender pride flag alongside the official Virginia flag outside her D.C. office.

Narissa Rahaman, a regional field organizer for the Human Rights Campaign, shared an image of the flag on Twitter Thursday, which she said is the only office on the Hill with one. Rahaman also said Wexton told her the flag is there because of the community’s support.  

The congresswoman, who is also an aunt to a transgender child, told theWashingtonian that she raised the flag in front of her office as a show of support for the transgender community.

“The trans community has been under attack,” she said. “I wanted to show my solidarity because we are talking about my friends and family.”

Read the rest here: http://time.com/5494775/jennifer-wexton-transgender-pride-flag/

7 thoughts on “Rep. Jennifer Wexton Hangs Transgender Pride Flag Outside Her Capitol Hill Office

  1. THEY ARE BEING “RULED OVER” BY AN “IT”…………………NO PITCHFORKS/ NO TORCHES? LOVIN THAT MARXISM?
    PUSSIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. “The congresswoman, who is also an aunt to a transgender child,”
    THATS CHILD ABUSE. THAT FAMILY NEEDS TO BE LITERALLY BURNED AT THE STAKE………..

  3. “Organized Jewry (Communism) is a corrosive acid that seeps into the fissure of society (race, gender, class) in the name of ‘social change’ in order to undermine it. Despite this moral posture, there is no genuine desire to empower the goyim. See liberalism, feminism, #MeToo, migration, homosexuality in this light.”
    — Henry Makow

    “Only a society that wants to die could convince itself that men’s sexual desire for women is ‘toxic’ and harmful.”
    — J. Flamengo

    “It seems that almost anything can be discussed today except the Jewish problem. The very mention of the word ‘Jew’ is cause for a storm. Personally, I feel that the only hope for a moderate solution lies in an open and frank discussion.”
    — C. Lindbergh, 1941

    .

  4. “If someone obstinately objects to the massive control and unwelcome influence and the robbing of others rights and property, under the pretext of divine entitlement, does that person become the unreasonable ‘bigot?’ What kind of skewed logic is that? … I denounce any person or group who turns a blind eye and reacts with a deafening silence to the unimaginable repulsive racism that oozes from some Jewish supremacist groups, yet instead, hysterically and shamelessly react to someone who accidentally came to discover such horrors.”
    — N. Izzat

    .

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*