Published on May 14, 2014 by John DoeX
Visit http://pilotsfor911truth.org/store#sk… to grab your copy in HD.
You are the Jury as new and existing evidence is gathered with regard to the aviation related events of September 11, 2001. Analysis includes in depth study of the Departure Gate at Dulles, In-Flight navigation and alignment combined with further scrutiny of the data provided by government agencies which far exceed the capabilities of the alleged aircraft reported. Encompassing a fresh comprehensive examination into the extreme speeds reported based on new evidence as it compares to precedent set by other aircraft accidents on the record with respect to manufacturer limitations… and more. Exhibits are presented making a strong case for a new independent investigation into the day which changed our world.
proven science is a M-Fer to a proven lie isnt it
I was given two copies of the 911 Commission Report (both gifts) but never opened them. I did take them to my local library for a donation and asked the woman at the desk to place them under FICTION please. She looked up at me and by the expression on her face I knew she got it. Made my day.
priceless
For people claiming to be pilots, they sure don’t know much about;
1. Indicated Airspeed
2. Calibrated Airspeed
3. Equivalent Airspeed
4. True Airspeed
5. Ground Speed.
I go news for these pilots. Almost all jet liners fly between 450 to 550 kts.
Criminal investigation doesn’t compare serial number of parts in the aircraft. That for accidents so the FAA can check them back to their maintenance history.
Stop the presses. I just got the whole story from the Abraham Rabbinowitz Institute for 9-11 Truth.
The towers never collapsed. The new tower is really just a hologram that encompasses the old towers, so when you walk inside it looks like you’re headed into a new building, but you’re really walking into the original Twin Towers, because they never really collapsed. It was all a stunt to collect on life insurance policies, but everyone who worked in the World Trade Center is back at their old job, in their original office. The Black Pope did it all with mirrors.
Theorize all you like, but when talking to other people who aren’t “awake”, please limit the conversation to things that can be proven scientifically, or we’ll all be made fools of in the press, and they’ll think EVERYTHING we tell them is foolish.
I can prove that the twin towers were felled with explosives in less than a minute, with facts that can be confirmed in any library. NO ONE can refute my argument, unless they can re-write all known laws of physics and chemistry.
The Zionist media made A-holes of all of us the last time the “no plane” theory was making the rounds, and it put years of progress down the toilet.
Since the “no plane” thing is rearing its ugly head again, I’m going to add an addendum here (without being angry or sarcastic) and I hope the no plane proponents get back here to see it.
I don’t have a day to spend digging up the formulas and doing the math, it was all done 9 years ago, I hate doing it, and I’m not doing it again, but interested parties need to remember this:
Fluid dynamics 101: The fuel that’s stored in the wings (or any encapsulated liquid) will behave as a solid, and should be treated as a solid in all of your mass x velocity calculations, so we’re not talking about hollow aluminum wings…. as far as calculating sheer force is concerned, you’re talking about heavy solid wedges moving at 500 mph. (I didn’t look at the BS this time around, but the last time the no plane thing was being circulated, that was the crux of their lie) A 767 with full tanks has more than enough weight in the wings to cut through the beams on the upper floors. (many WTC beams tapered to thinner widths to save weight toward the upper floors — make sure your calculations account for the steel thickness 82 floor up — which would be a lot thinner than on the ground floor) Unfortunately, the true wing weight may never be known, because we’re not sure what kind of plane hit the towers.
Also, there are many eye-witnesses to the second plane hit, as well as a few independent videos, because a lot of people were watching the first tower burn, and at least two people put videos cameras on tri-pods after the first hit. I don’t know how the present “no planers” are explaining that, but last time they claimed they were all doctored, which is a bit too far fetched to believe.
Also, live coverage of the event on 9-11 proves that most of the news agencies were out of the loop until a day or two later, and if you look at the live reporting of the incident from 9-11, anchormen and news crews were actually telling the truth. The “no plane” theory puts all of the news agencies in on the plot long before it happened if they were to show all of this doctored footage on TV, and all of the reporting from the day indicates that most of them knew nothing.
and remember — there’s a lot of “scientific” evidence that supports global warming too, but it’s still BS. It’s just a matter of ignoring the important science.
If 1% is true…