All I can say is: Those who would willingly consent to this treasonous act of terrorism, and violation of inherent rights and natural law, shall surely manifest the destiny they unknowingly seek. I choose to exercise my God given liberty, or I will die defending said liberty. I will NEVER see the inside of either a jail cell or camp. PERIOD.
Well, I’ll put it this way: as for turning it around on THEM, either we do it, or God will (indefinite detention in the Lake of Fire…gee you’d think they’d prefer that we do it!)
I think this country is under judgement from God, and we are being delivered to our enemies. If we don’t ourselves step in in a massive way and stop all this insanity this county and most of us are as good as smoking ruins and corpses.
You’re exactly right, Jolly Roger. Laws like this DO put the pigs in more danger, as does the more general trend of police viciously brutalizing or even killing people who attempt to surrender for arrest.
The reason is clear. If someone who faces arrest knows that even peaceful surrender could cost him brain damage from savage beating while in handcuffs, and/or lead to a possible life held without trial in a torture chamber, then he’d have to be crazy to go quietly. He’s far more likely in that case to fight to the death, taking a few hated enforcers with him. The pigs and the tyrants they serve are making this bed for themselves. Woe to them if too many citizens learn to hate their oppressors more than they fear death (which eventually gets us all anyway).
Let’s not forget what happened when a group of journalists challenged the law in federal court: They won their original case with the judge, a female Obama appointee, ruling the indefinite detention provision of the NDAA was unconstitutional. A Black male federal judge and Obama appointee from the Obama administration intervened, putting the decision on ice until appeal. The appeals court ruled the indefinite detention provision was constitutional. The journalists appealed the case to the US Supreme Court.
The US Supreme Court has refused to try the case!!!
I saw Jew-girl Ginsberg on a YouTube video saying, “How can we decide something like that?”
Mr. Government man, remember that a dying man is the most dangerous creature of them all!!
Why? You ask…because they don’t care, and your life is meaningless to them!
Sorry, I gave no consent to any such law.
…………………./´¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯
……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
……………………..’…../
……….”…………. _.·´
……………………..(
…………..………….…
Perfectly phrased #1… 😎
Wow, that didn’t compute until the second look, after my first post!(laughing) Nice work #1! I unwittingly seconded that.
🙂
LOL… they do tend to come out scrambled in the e-mails.
MIDDLE FINGER!!!
Amen#1
All I can say is: Those who would willingly consent to this treasonous act of terrorism, and violation of inherent rights and natural law, shall surely manifest the destiny they unknowingly seek. I choose to exercise my God given liberty, or I will die defending said liberty. I will NEVER see the inside of either a jail cell or camp. PERIOD.
Maybe this needs to be turned around on THEM?
Well, I’ll put it this way: as for turning it around on THEM, either we do it, or God will (indefinite detention in the Lake of Fire…gee you’d think they’d prefer that we do it!)
“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” (Marbury vs.Madison, 1803.)
I think this country is under judgement from God, and we are being delivered to our enemies. If we don’t ourselves step in in a massive way and stop all this insanity this county and most of us are as good as smoking ruins and corpses.
MEN HAVE TURNED THEIR BACK ON THE AKJV,AND REFUSED TO “BE BAPTISED FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS” IN THE NAME OF GOD, ACTS 2;38, THIS IS THE RESULT
It’s a good law, because it’s the kind of law that will get a lot of pigs shot.
Are you going to allow yourself to be handcuffed and hauled away without any guarantee of due process?
If you can stuff me in a dungeon forever without a fair trial, I’m not so sure I’d be willing to “go along quietly” if arrested.
You’re exactly right, Jolly Roger. Laws like this DO put the pigs in more danger, as does the more general trend of police viciously brutalizing or even killing people who attempt to surrender for arrest.
The reason is clear. If someone who faces arrest knows that even peaceful surrender could cost him brain damage from savage beating while in handcuffs, and/or lead to a possible life held without trial in a torture chamber, then he’d have to be crazy to go quietly. He’s far more likely in that case to fight to the death, taking a few hated enforcers with him. The pigs and the tyrants they serve are making this bed for themselves. Woe to them if too many citizens learn to hate their oppressors more than they fear death (which eventually gets us all anyway).
Let’s not forget what happened when a group of journalists challenged the law in federal court: They won their original case with the judge, a female Obama appointee, ruling the indefinite detention provision of the NDAA was unconstitutional. A Black male federal judge and Obama appointee from the Obama administration intervened, putting the decision on ice until appeal. The appeals court ruled the indefinite detention provision was constitutional. The journalists appealed the case to the US Supreme Court.
The US Supreme Court has refused to try the case!!!
I saw Jew-girl Ginsberg on a YouTube video saying, “How can we decide something like that?”
It’s your job, traitor!
Mr. Government man, remember that a dying man is the most dangerous creature of them all!!
Why? You ask…because they don’t care, and your life is meaningless to them!