The Common Sense Show – by Dave Hodges
Over 90% of the American people do not want Obama to attack Syria. The top military leadership in this country has also advised against this fool’s errand.
The following people, pictured below, and the criminal bankers that they represent, are the only ones that are itching for a fight with Syria. These are the faces of the people who will be the world’s next war criminals.
On Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said the U.S. received new physical evidence in the form of blood and hair samples that show sarin gas was used in the August 21 attack. To Mr. Kerry, I would say that nobody is disputing the use of sarin gas in Damascus. What is at issue is who perpetrated that attacks, al-Qaeda or Assad? Since Assad had nothing to gain from the use of the chemical agents except to invite Western intervention, the perpetrator was undoubtedly the CIA backed al-Qaeda.
The fact that Secretary of State, John Kerry, said the U.S. must respond because its credibility on the line. Really, Mr. Kerry, we have to attack Syria, kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians all because your administration’s credibility is on the line? Where do reckless statements, such as these, cross over the line from abject stupidity and enter the realm of casting this administration as a regime which commits war crimes against the helpless? If this administration attacks the innocent people in Syria, that is precisely what the responsible people will be, war criminals.
Assad is nobody’s fool, he has had time to make himself and his military an elusive target in which multitudes will perish in the attempt to find and eradicate his forces.
Knowing that an unwarranted American military attack is inevitable, military officials have stated that Assad has moved assets such as military helicopters, tanks as well as heavy artillery pieces around the country, thus forcing the U.S. to reconfigure the use of cruise missiles and air strikes over a wider range of territory. Further, this does not totally mitigate the nearly 700 SCUD missiles that Assad has pointed at Israel. If Syria is attacked, it is clear that Israel will also be attacked and this when events could quickly spin out of control.
Therefore, if Obama sticks with targeting a well-defined set of military and intelligence assets, then the wider dispersal range of the cruise-missile strikes will kill untold number of civilians.
Since military officials have told Obama that he could adjust his attack strategy to Assad’s dispersal of weapons by expanding the number of strikes to hit more targets, this increases the likelihood that Hamas will become involved as agents of Assad. Will they be given chemical weapons? Will they carry out suicide attacks? Subsequently, there is a hidden cost to pay for Obama to widening the war. A wider dispersal of American cruise missiles will undoubtedly cause collateral damage, thus greatly increasing the number of civilian casualties. This fact, alone, exposes the Obama deception for what it truly is because no rational leader would avenge Syrian civilian casualties caused by a sarin gas attack by killing tens of thousands of more Syrians. It is so clear that taking out Assad is a means to an end which is to use Syria as a launching pad from which to conduct a regime change in Iran and thus, save the almighty Petrodollar.
Another senior official said the dispersal of Assad’s military assets was “certainly detrimental” to target planning. This means a wider and more deadly war along with the possibility of escalating into World War III.
Even General Dempsey has reservations about attacking Syria.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey, has issued a warning to this administration about the folly of a military attack upon Syria. Dempsey wrote last month that, “As we weigh our options, we should be able to conclude with some confidence that use of force will move us toward the intended outcome. Once we take action, we should be prepared for what comes next. Deeper involvement is hard to avoid.” And what would Dempsey be referring to with regard to deeper involvement and problems that would follow? Dempsey is clearly worried about what comes after an attack upon Syria? He is warning about the possibility of World War III. This is what Dempsey warned Congress about in a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee. In an interview with ABC News,Dempsey stated that the lessons of Iraq heavily influenced his beliefs regarding Syria.
The rank and file of the military is speaking out against Obama’s war mongering ways. I have been in inundated with communications from active duty personnel which strongly indicate that they are opposed to war in Syria. The military has crossed a milestone. The military used to accept their mission without question. However, with the slaughter in Iraq and the US military forced to guard the heroin shipments by al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, the military has had enough. This also explains why we witnessed two senior command officers, General Hamm and Admiral Gayoutte, attempt to rescue Ambassador Stevens in violation of Obama’s orders. I called the event an attempted coup against the President and if these two officers had rescued Ambassador Stevens, Obama would have had his hands full with the military.
Obama has changed military leadership more than most people change their underwear. The military has had enough of bankster driven goals which are serving to undermine and misuse the military. I have often written that Obama could very well be the victim of a military coup and when the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff question Obama’s intentions in Syria and that criticism is public, Obama had better surround himself with more than the Secret Service.
Last week, I serendipitously watched the 1964 classic movie, Seven Days in May, starring Kirk Douglas and i thought I was watching a news story about today’s strained relationships between senior military command leadership and their President. In the movie, the Joint Chiefs launched an unsuccessful coup against the President. Today, I think a coup could and would succeed.
The topic of a military coup is a slippery slope because they usually lead to a military dictatorship and that frightens me almost as much as Obama’s presidency. However, Obama’s presidency is unsustainable and he must be removed from office, hopefully through the impeachment process.
The Syrians Are Opportunistic Propaganda Warriors
The Syrian Electronic Army (SEA) wrote a lengthy message to their “friends” in the U.S military according to the International Business Times. The SEA hacked pictures American soldiers holding signs protesting the coming Syrian war. This was a brilliant move! The Syrians know our troops are war weary and they are playing upon military frustration.
Conclusion
Nobody wants this war except the people who have much to gain and they are going to attempt to achieve their goals at the expense of the welfare of humanity. The late, great, Michael Jackson, was wrong about one thing, one bad apple does indeed spoil the whole bunch. We are seeing evidence of this fact inside of these events. If we do not quickly change course with regard to Syria, we may soon find out if America is truly a nation under judgment.
http://thecommonsenseshow.com/2013/09/02/the-us-military-fears-war-with-syria/
The “late, great Michael Jackson”????
Impeachment is fine…but then we get the Israel-firster Joe Biden…we need to do better than that! But since most Americans are too fearful and cowardly, unfortunately the military would have to be relied on to remove the traitors from power (and then they can get started on the banksters…) Hopefully, without violence
some while back, a few years anyway, i recall reading where Biden was one of the people who wrote the Patriot Act, that having been done a few years before Sept.11th happened. The legislation was then put into a drawer, and when 2001 happened, it was pulled out, shoved through congress at 3am where no one read it……..and here we are……
I don’t know if this is 100percent accurate…do think its close, though!
God! high school students could do a better job of governing then this monkey show.
I wonder if the Joint Chiefs of Staff told Obama that without Congressional approval they would refuse his illegal order to attack Syria. Congress on board would at least give them some cover from war crime charges, maybe.
Thanks to Boehner and Cantor, Congress is more than happy to give Obama and Israel their blessing and approval. So as always, you can forget Congress.
Boehner Comes Out, “Supports Obama’s Call For Action” Says Colleagues Should Also; Stocks Slide
http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/boehner-comes-out-supports-obamas-call-for-action-says-colleagues-should-also-stocks-slide/56238#comment-439800
I’m sure Congress will give Israel what they want, when have they not? Even without benefiting Israel, the Dems will support their fuhrer and the Repubs never saw a war they didn’t love. I’m just saying that the military commanders must be a least a little nervous about committing war crimes by illegally attacking another country, especially on the order of one lone psychopath.
It needs to be done over his birth certificate and Social Security number, Then ever act as President is null and void! He is not qualified to hold office!
What ever happened to Vetting candidates for Office?