U.N. to vote Monday on call for U.S. Jerusalem decision to be withdrawn

Reuters

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) – The United Nations Security Council is due to vote on Monday on a draft resolution calling for the withdrawal of U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, diplomats said, a move likely to face a Washington veto.

The one-page Egyptian-drafted text, seen by Reuters, does not specifically mention the United States or Trump. Diplomats say it has broad support among the 15-member council, and while it is unlikely to be adopted, the vote will further isolate Trump on the issue.  

To pass, a resolution needs nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the United States, France, Britain, Russia or China.

Trump abruptly reversed decades of U.S. policy this month when he recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, generating outrage from Palestinians. Trump also plans to move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley has praised Trump’s decision as “the just and right thing to do.”

The U.S. mission to the United Nations was not immediately available to comment on Sunday.

Arab foreign ministers agreed to seek a U.N. Security Council resolution on the issue. The draft U.N. text expresses “deep regret at recent decisions concerning the status of Jerusalem.”

It “affirms that any decisions and actions which purport to have altered, the character, status or demographic composition of the Holy City of Jerusalem have no legal effect, are null and void and must be rescinded in compliance with relevant resolutions of the Security Council.”

The draft also calls upon all countries to refrain from establishing diplomatic missions in Jerusalem.

Israel considers the city its eternal and indivisible capital and wants all embassies based there.

“No vote or debate will change the clear reality that Jerusalem” is the capital of Israel, Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, said in a statement on Saturday.

Palestinians want the capital of an independent Palestinian state to be in the city’s eastern sector, which Israel captured in a 1967 war and annexed in a move never recognized internationally.

The draft council resolution “demands that all states comply with Security Council resolutions regarding the Holy City of Jerusalem, and not to recognize any actions or measures contrary to those resolutions.”

A U.N. Security Council resolution adopted in December 2016 “underlines that it will not recognize any changes to the 4 June 1967 lines, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties through negotiations.”

That resolution was approved with 14 votes in favor and an abstention by former U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration, which defied heavy pressure from longtime ally Israel and Trump, who was then president-elect, for Washington to wield its veto.

7 thoughts on “U.N. to vote Monday on call for U.S. Jerusalem decision to be withdrawn

    1. They’re just voting to ask that the decision be withdrawn, at least publicly.

      Behind the scenes, you may be right.

  1. What is the U.S.policy on this again? Just ask “israel”, whatever that is.

    They’ll tell ya what it is. And then the united snakes will follow up with whatever action this fictional place tells US to.

    The u.n. can suck my butt, too. They’ve been nothing but an illegal smoke screen zionist controlled opposition group like the nra that NEVER should have existed and we NEVER should have been a part of in the first place! They declared this “israel” into existence.

    1. “They declared this “israel” into existence.”

      Believe it or not… that was THE main objective of both WWI & WWII.

      1. Oh, absolutely, #1! Balfour declaration of 1917 was complicit enough and Haavara 1933 sealed the deal. Genociding the Germans was key and they’ve suffered aplenty over the last 100 for sure.

        1. It was supposed to have been accomplished with the League of Nations after WW I, but that failed (the U.S. vetoed, of all ‘people’), Martist.

          If it had been, there wouldn’t have been a WW II.

          Or maybe there would have been anyway, but there would have been no need for it to accomplish the stinking jews’ NWO agenda.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*