UlstermanThe Obama White House is very pleased to have three Democrats on the FCC panel decide to approve a government takeover of the Internet. Of course, the effort was called “A free and open” Internet. Free and open meaning the government will have the power to decide who and what and when in the guise of “for the little people.”
Consider this – was the Internet broken? NO. Then what exactly was the Obama administration’s true intent here? Ah, what it is always, whether it be the foods you eat, the cars you drive, or the income you earn, it always comes back to CONTROL.
Here’s the presidential victory lap on today’s FCC decision which was promptly tweeted out by Valerie Jarrett, who likely was its author:
What Barack Obama is actually saying here is that the government will now have the power to control the next generation of Internet entrepreneurs. Having locked up control/support of such big names like Google, Facebook, YouTube, etc., now the Obama administration has the potential power to determine what websites are deemed “acceptable” and those that are not.
They will never admit this of course, but go back to repeating the “free and open” line. That is what soft tyranny does – wrapping itself in the warm and fuzzy as the noose grows increasingly tighter around the neck.
As for the “four million” who wrote into the FCC, that is nothing more than a reflection of yet another Organizing for Action campaign. The Obama machine simply sent out a request that people tell the FCC they support a free and open Internet (who doesn’t?) and then forward that request to the FCC and there you find the “four million people” figure. It’s all manufactured smoke and mirrors, much like the entirety of this administration.
__________________
D.W. Ulsterman is an author and freedom-loving political commentator.
http://ulstermanbooks.com/valerie-jarrett-quick-to-celebrate-takeover-of-internet/
BOTH choices where sh!t.
They get to regulate under the now article II but under article I the service providers would have been able to charge what ever to who ever they wanted and they decided what bandwidth and who gets access.
SO now they can regulate the trenches off the web but the other would have made it possible for the service provider to extort money from the trenches and then limited access to the site and how much bandwidth the site has available and who can connect to it.
Sh!t choice either way. DID YOU EXPECT DIFFERENT from the zio commie crooks?
This is bad voodoo. I haven’t heard the death knell yet but it’s getting close. Let’s see…..
Server tax
Webmaster tax
User tax
The price for the “privilege” of using the net will go up. I don’t think they will mess around with video games, porn or hollywood to much. They don’t want that “shot heard round the world” thing happening. At least not until their ready.
Exactly!
It ALWAYS comes down to mammon, doesn’t it.
Question was it takeover or was it nationalized?
takeover |ˈtākˌōvər|
noun
an act of assuming control of something, esp. the buying out of one company by another.
nationalize |ˈna sh ənəˌlīz|
verb [ trans. ]
1 transfer (a major branch of industry or commerce) from private to state ownership or control.
2 make distinctively national; give a national character to : in the 13th and 14th centuries church designs were further nationalized.
3 [usu. as adj. ] ( nationalized) naturalize (a foreigner) : he is now a nationalized Frenchman.
Only 4 million out of 330 million? That’s not saying much, Barry. That’s worse than saying, “1 out of a million” wanted it. Almost worse than winning the lottery. That’s like saying a few small cities in the US wanted it and saying everyone wanted it. Typical Communist way. Making the minority seem like the majority and making the majority seem like the minority. Pathetic.