Wow. That was fast. It’s only been two weeks (15 days to be exact).
“I plan to devote all of my strength and resources to seeing that some good comes from this evil,” wrote Andy Parker in his recent Washington Post op-ed titled “My daughter was killed on live television. I will do whatever it takes to end gun violence”. “I am entering this arena with open eyes. I realize the magnitude of the force that opposes sensible and reasonable safeguards on the purchase of devices that have a single purpose: to kill.”
"To make change we need to keep pressure on lawmakers until they do the right thing." -Andy Parker #WhateverItTakes pic.twitter.com/AXZO2UooEQ
— NNEDV (@nnedv) September 10, 2015
Andy Parker, who recently dropped everything including his run for the Henry County Board of Supervisors to focus all of his attention on his new “bigger mission” of gun control just weeks after the highly reported shooting of his daughter Alison Parker and her cameraman Adam Ward on live TV, is now leading an anti-gun rally in D.C. under the banner of #WhateverItTakes. The hashtag campaign is the baby of Bloomberg-funded anti-gun group Moms Demand Action. “We have to ask ourselves: What do we need to do to stop this insanity? In my case, the answer is: ‘Whatever it takes’,” Parker said. Whatever it takes apparently means that, only two weeks after his daughter was reportedly shot to death on live TV, he is making every public appearance he can, giving speeches and smiling for photo ops.
Andy Parker, father of murder victim Allison Parker, calls out @RepGoodlatte for being in NRA's pocket. @MomsDemand pic.twitter.com/lBp0pgXLSN
— Moe Davis (@ColMorrisDavis) September 10, 2015
The group aims to make September 10th of each year into a “national day of action”: “We’re turning September 10 — the week Congress returns from its summer recess — into a national day of action to make good on our pledge to do ‘whatever it takes’,” declared Moms Demand Action founder Shannon Watts.
It can only be said so many times. Gun laws aren’t going to stop criminals because criminals don’t follow laws. Law-abiding gun owners don’t kill people.
Living in a police state where the government and its standing army are the only ones with all the guns is the exact scenario the 2nd Amendment was written and put in place to prevent. On a side note, considering today we live in an America where three citizens a day on average are shot and killed by cops, do we really want the cops to be the only ones with all the guns?
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Contributed by The Daily Sheeple of www.TheDailySheeple.com.
You go girl…go on straight to shallow ditch that is your future, fairy.
“I realize the magnitude of the force that opposes sensible and reasonable safeguards on the purchase of devices that have a single purpose: to kill.”
If guns and killing are always bad, then take guns away from the police and military first. Or does killing magically become okay when it’s done in service to a government?
Whether or not a specific killing is morally justifiable has nothing to do with whether it is committed by a government employee or by a private citizen. Only the reasons and circumstances behind the killing are relevant to a moral judgment. Put another way, “lawful” and “moral” are wholly different considerations.
Also, it’s clearly false that guns are only for killing. Hasn’t this guy ever heard of recreational shooting? I use my guns for that all the time, though their primary purpose is to serve as weaponry if that should become necessary.
Well hey, if that don’t work out for him, he could always dig up graves and extract the gold and silver fillings. What a guy!
“We have to ask ourselves: What do we need to do to stop this insanity?”
A .40 to the back of your head?
I think “whatever it takes” applies to our side of the battle, too, so you just do what you have to, and let’s get the show on the road.
Hoo-Rah, J.R.!
By the way:…..
Why is it we never see ANY photography or live reporting by eyewitnesses at the “assumed” funerals of these “supposed” dead folks a-layin’ in their caskets all dead an’ stuff….? Too brutal an image to show a dead human all painted up by the embalmers? My Dad died from Mesothelioma… lung cancer…, and we still had an open casket funeral, despite him looking like his dead great-grandfather as he lay in that casket.
Where are the photos of the dead tart and her minion:
A: At the crime scene…
B: at the morgue…
C: in the casket…
D: surrounded by mourning family members and colleagues at the funeral – with real tears and weeping for their loss…
The terrible consequences of evil gunmen that would reveal the actual pain of real murders of real people is NEVER shown on the MSM…. and it would be the BEST propaganda they could provide to delude the dumb-masses… I wonder why they don’t use that imagery to sell their paranoia control aganda?
I’m still waiting for the Sandy Hoax evidence to arrive on the scene and prove it was a real event…. Since it appears many of those “alleged to have been murdered” children (albeit older-looking and with minor cosmetic modifications) sang at the Stupid Bowl:
(If you want to pretend that all the secrecy regarding the identities of those children and the blanket secrecy overall regarding ANYONE involved in that torrid affair is anything other than a stonewall effort to prevent the truth from being known, then YOU are the dead-minded sheeple we speak about daily)
…and this, to boot:
and this….
and this, too….sheesh!
“Where are the photos of the dead tart and her minion:
A: At the crime scene…
B: at the morgue…
C: in the casket…
D: surrounded by mourning family members and colleagues at the funeral – with real tears and weeping for their loss…
The terrible consequences of evil gunmen that would reveal the actual pain of real murders of real people is NEVER shown on the MSM…. and it would be the BEST propaganda they could provide to delude the dumb-masses… I wonder why they don’t use that imagery to sell their paranoia control aganda?”
Yep! Exactly, Darzak. Where are these pictures? You’d think they would want to show this stuff if it was “real”. It would make the people actually believe that it happened and not be so questionable and would get their NWO thing underway even faster.
It’s almost like murderers and psychopaths who are afraid to murder people. I’m confused.
Instead, they hire Hollywood production companies and crisis actors to make people believe that they did.
(Disclaimer: I’m in no way encouraging nor do I ever want these psychopaths or anyone else to go out and murder people whatsoever, just so they can show the real bodies. I’m just merely making an observational point.)