12 thoughts on “:WAR-CASTLES-~0.

  1. I attempted a random 15min.

    All I got from it was I hope someone jumps out from the side and stabs him in his stupid face.

    It is a good look into the idiocy of chumptards, though.

  2. SO, “RUSSEL J GOULD” “FIXED” THE WHORE OF BABYLON IN 1999 EH???
    DAMN!!!!
    I THOUGHT I FELT BETTER FOR SOME REASON!!
    (EYEING MY 4TH AND 9TH ARTICLE)
    THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU GIVE AN IDIOT A BIBLE……………
    THIS MAN IS HERE TO TRY TO GET AMERICA TO BE AT EASE. PULL YOUR MAGAZINES OUT OF YOUR WEAPONS, WORK THE BOLT, EJECT THAT CHAMBERED ROUND AND GO BACK TO SLEEP………….
    NO TAXATION WITHOUT FK ING REPRESENTATION!!!
    and i mean a damned bunch of representation. HANG THE DAMN TRAITORS!!!!
    CLOSE THE BORDERS!!
    CLOSE THE DAMNED PORTS!!!
    BREAK OUT YOUR BACKBONE AMERICA!!! RUN THESE DAMN JEWISH BANKERS OUT OF THIS COUNTRY!!!
    BANKRUPTCY MY ASS… ITS YOUR COUNTRY!!!
    WHERE YA GONNA GO? TO MARS OR SOME SHIT????
    TAKE IT BACK!!!!!!!!!!

  3. HE IS RIGHT ABOUT THE IDENTITY OF “THE WHORE OF BABYLON”. BUT I BET HE NEVER SAYS THAT IT IS INDEED….”JEWISH”. THE SECOND BEAST IN REVELATION IS AN “IMAGE” OF THE FIRST ONE…. THE JEWS CAPTURED THE CHURCH IN ROME. CREATING CATHOLICISM.. THE FIRST BEAST WAS THE SANHEDRIN THAT STARTED THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD. THE SECOND BEAST IS THE “COLLEGE OF CARDINALS” THAT CREATED THE CATECHISM……
    THIS POPERY IS STEEPED IN FREEMASONRY, MORMONISM, JEHOVY WITNESSES,AND 7TH DAY ADVENTS, AND EVEN SCIENTOLOGY. SHE IS IN THE PROCESS OF CAPTURING “PROTESTANTISM”. ALL TELEVANGELISTS BOW TO THAT POPE AND KISS HIS RING, AND HIS ASS,
    EVERY
    SINGLE
    DAMNED
    ONE
    OF
    THEM. WHILE “PROTESTANT CHURCHES” FACILITATE THE INVASION ON THE BORDER(SHOW ME A “PROTESTANT” IN THE BIBLE)

    THE NEW WORLD RELIGION IS “LOVE”…..
    WHICH REALLY AMOUNTS TO,”TOLERATION OF ALL AND ANYTHING”…..

    HOW LONG WILL YOU LANGUISH WITHOUT JUDGEMENT AMERICA?
    UNTIL THE HEATHENS RAPE YOUR SONS AND MURDER YOUR DAUGHTERS???????
    UNTIL EVERY FAMILY LIVES IN A TENT DOWN BY THE CREEK???
    SHAME ON YOUR LILLY LIVERED ASSES!!!!!

  4. The language construct brought forth by David Miller, you can see in the mandamus on this site. I have no doubt that what is claimed he constructed is mathematically correct in matter of fact.
    However the construct he developed is in support of a one world system. What he fails to mention is the sovereignty of the free individual and the fact that via the ratified law for the united States of the Americas (the Bill of Rights), there was never any authority for any of these foreign sovereigns to bring the admiralty vessel upon our shores, in fact it is forbidden in the 9th and 10th Articles, and that Donald John Trump and every corporate operative in this unlawful corporate government and the creation of the birth certificate system are all fraudulent, again, as they violate the supreme law of the individual free sovereign nationals for the united States of the Americas.
    I have set across the table from David Miller at a seminar in Reno, Nevada. I was summoned there by patriots for the purpose of confronting David. He declared through his seminar that we would conduct the confrontation as if in the common law court.
    My lieutenant produced the only lawsuit using the language and procedures to ever physically be signed by a judge. It was a Russian judge and was unbinding and unenforceable. You will notice in the mandamus on this site that there is no physical signature of any judge.
    We had agreed at the beginning of the confrontation that it would be conducted without emotion and without raising our voices.
    In the finale, I took David’s law procedures from whence I learned to write fact of law in present tense. I held them up in front of him.
    One of the slogans David had always used was that two plus two does not equal three, but must equal four.
    Holding his procedures before his face, I told him, “David I believe this to be absolutely correct, this is the common law correctly presented.”
    I had brought with me a great big book called the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
    I laid his procedures on the table and said, “This is the truth and it is correct”.
    Then I held the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure before him and I said, “This is the unlawful admiralty, this has guns behind it.”
    I then slammed the book down on top of his procedures and said, “Two plus two equals three.”
    He then became very agitated and started speaking loudly, saying that I and my people were ahead of the curve and this is why we were beaten outside the courtrooms by the corporate enforcers. As his seminar was falling apart, some of the goons he had with him came to me and my lieutenant and tried to offer us money for what we had suffered in our attempt to implement the procedures and correct the jurisdiction.
    We told them we didn’t want their f-king money, got up from the table and headed for the door, with his $500 a pop seminar attendees right on our heels. They asked us to stay in Reno and asked if I would speak to them further. They offered us motel rooms and all accommodations. I explained that two of my children were home from college for a break and that I had to return to Chiloquin.
    I then proceeded further toward the door when one of the gentlemen put his hand on my shoulder, looked me in the eye, and said, “We are not going to be able to stop this without a war, are we?” To which I replied, “No sir, we are not”.
    The work Miller has done, I have no doubt is without flaw, but like I have told you people before, on April 19, 1775, the people by their own initiative went to war with the king’s men, solely for their natural unalienable rights. A year and half later the corporate elite, formerly the king’s men in the colonies, wrote the Declaration of Independence as an announcement of a revolution, specifically to create a new country that they intended to rule.
    The whole hypotheses that one of the criminals operating under the unlawful 14th Amendment has anything to do with our individual rights and freedoms under the ratified law of the Bill of Rights is erroneous.
    Miller’s effort is not for the individual free sovereign national. It is for an international system of commerce to be legitimatized, which cannot occur as long as he is dealing with the unlawful corporation known as the United States.
    Only we the people in our individual capacity can enforce the absolute law that removes the unlawful corporation and leaves us as individuals to decide who we engage in commerce with through written fact of law in present tense.
    As indicated by the video, though correct in grammar and syntax, the whole hypotheses revolves around nation states, completely ignoring the fact that the individual free sovereign national for the united States of the Americas, as an individual, is the nation state. All the rest is pure fraud, as evidenced absolutely through the violation of the absolute ratified law of the individual free sovereigns of this country (the Bill of Rights), which is grammatically correct and cannot be changed.
    To suggest that Donald Trump is some sort of savior puts all those involved in compliance with treason.
    Back at ya, David.

    1. BUT, BUT, HENREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!
      THE WHORE OF BABYLON WAS “FIXED” IN 1999!!!!!!
      BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

    2. Henry, I wasn’t going to watch the vid in its entirety, but now I know I have to make to time so I can better understand all the points you are referring to. Thank you, for remembering me, and him, and her, and them over there, and over there – all the unnamed INDIVIDUALS who want to be at the helm of our own lives, sovereign and free, with no directing force menacing our determinism. At first, some of what you wrote here seemed over my head but as you summarized, I got it. We could have all the best of mathematical precision pointing to solutions but lost in the shuffle is that the whole is made up of the sum of its parts, and individuals are the “parts.” If the parts are compromised, the whole suffers. In other words, a free society REQUIRES free individuals. I guess I’ve no right to comment until I’ve seen the whole vid. Will try to watch it today. Thanks for once again making me stretch.

      🙂

      .

  5. Russel J. Gould- This name is mentioned in writing in the very beginning of the video regarding copy right. I looked this name up & here is what I found.

  6. I was just reading through the comments on above video. One said this David Miller was dead and was alluded to it being something strange.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*