What These Two Bundy Ranch Protesters Filed For Will Have the Feds Shaking in Their Boots

Freedom Outpost – by Tim Brown

Not backing off from the threat of tyrants, two Bundy Ranch protesters have made requests for pretrial discover that is sure to expose the corruption in the DC government. Radio show host Peter Santilli has filed a similar pretrial discovery request to that of militia leader Joseph O’Shaughnessy who was also arrested the day that Santill was.

According to the request, which was dated at the first of March, Santilli requested the following:  

  • All documents and information relating to orders or requests any law enforcement officer made to Santilli asking or directing him to change his broadcasts in any way from April 1, 2014 through January 26, 2016
  • All documents and information relating to any notice from law enforcement officers to Santilli from April 1, 2014 through January 26, 2016 that his broadcasts were considered to be unlawful in any way.
  • All documents and information showing whether Santilli is or was on the terror watch list anytime from January 2013 to the present, and if his name was on the terror watch list, all documents showing why it was so placed there.
  • All documents and information showing whether Santilli acted as an informant for the FBI or any other federal law enforcement agency from January 2011 to the present.
  • All documents and information showing any efforts the FBI or any other federal law enforcement agency took to investigate the false information published on the Internet from January 2014 to the present claiming that Santilli had worked as an FBI informant.
  • All documents and information showing communications from or by any federal law enforcement agent relating to or naming Santilli from January 2013 to the present, including but not limited to any email or text communications.
  • All documents and information showing or relating to any communications naming or relating to Pete Santilli, sent to or from the BLM Special Agent Daniel P. Love and/or FBI Special Agent Gregory Bretzing, including but not limited to all email and text communications naming or relating to Santilli, from January 2014 to the present.
  • All documents showing whether the FBI or any other law enforcement agency has or had super administrator privileges or back-door administrative privileges with ThePeteSantilliShow.com, Guerilla Media Network, Santilli’s YouTube channel, or other internet sites through which Santilli publishes content such as Spreaker or Facebook, from January 2013 through the present.
  • All notes, reports or other documents relating to federal law enforcement officer(s) watching Santilli online, his live streaming video productions, or The Pete Santilli Show, from March 2014 to the present, including the names of any officers watching Santilli, the date the officer watched Santilli, the show episode number and any notes or reports generated from watching him or his show.

Why is this important? First and foremost it will expose whether or not the feds were following the law and whether or not there were lawful warrants issued via the Fourth Amendment to engage in surveilling Santilli.

Second, Santilli has been accused of being and FBI informant by several people on the internet with what Santilli has said are fake documents. This discovery will put that issue to bed, and I have no doubt that those who put out that information will be facing a civil suit.

Finally, the documents should expose what was going on behind the scenes and what the mindset of the feds were in the entire Bundy Ranch siege, as well as the standoff that occurred in Oregon.

On Tuesday, Santilli posted the following update on hisFacebook page:

Judge Anna Brown has ruled that defendants being held in Multnomah County Jail in the case of US vs Ammon Bundy et al.. that are being charged in the Nevada case of US vs Cliven Bundy et al — Will be released to Nevada and due to arrive there on april 13th 2016, and that they must be returned back to Oregon within 10 days of their arraignments in the Nevada Court —

In the ex parte hearing heard today by Judge Brown in the case of Peter T. Santilli asking for the judge to sign a subpoena concerning the order of certain private records of particular government agents, she has decided to put that signing on hold but has not ruled it out —

The government will now have to argue why she should refuse to sign a subpoena that would force them to turn over these records for the Defense — Get ready for the first real court battle over evidence to begin!!

My hope is that this is the beginning of the end in exposing the depth of corruption within not only our government, but also members of the alternative media.

Other protesters are still jailed, including Cliven Bundy, on trumped up charges. No violence was committed at Bundy Ranch or the Oregon Wildlife Refuge. In fact, the only shots that came from guns were those taken by members of the Oregon State Police and the FBI. That, my friends, should tell you who the criminals are in this matter.

Freedom Outpost

5 thoughts on “What These Two Bundy Ranch Protesters Filed For Will Have the Feds Shaking in Their Boots

  1. Um, all this is for is to keep Santilli from being shanked in prison. The feds will have 0 problem falsifying info for him, denying a relationship. This request does not a damned thing to incriminate the feds in any way…

  2. “My hope is that this is the beginning of the end in exposing the depth of corruption within not only our government, but also members of the alternative media.”

    That has been exposed REPEATEDLY over the years.

    Your hope SHOULD be that the stupid sheeple in this country finally get pissed enough to do what needs to be done to remedy the situation.

    That’s the REAL problem we’re facing these days!

  3. I met Pete for the first time at the rally Jan 2nd in Burns. He’s a right on, stand up guy not affraid to excercise his freedom of speech. He had a guy with a camera following him around, and everything I heard him say was spot on. He called out other news media there as being state sponsored, and for saying they didn’t believe in the entire Constitution, a crowd actually formed as Pete kept asing the news anchor what part don’t you believe in? What part ? the guy finally left in a hurry, Ha ha. You got to like the guy. I was talking to him and mentioned I was down from Alaska and he just came right over and gave me a big bear hug, and thanked me for coming down! I hope the truth here comes out, because nobody deserves to be slandered. Pete is doing what most people are affraid of doing, documenting the truth and standing by his words, and for what is right

  4. Sounds like that judge anna brown is another piece of work just making things up making up new laws court rules andI don’t care I’m Anna brownstain , innocent til prove guilty not in that courtroom, it’s all about power respect so they can just up any.charge they want County wildlife refuge plus they just made some things up

  5. The Feds only need a court order to monitor stuff that isn’t already in the public domain. Santilli’s broadcasts were and still are in the public domain, so the discovery request is nothing more than a not-so-clever fishing expedition. Make what you want of any “revelations” that FBI was monitoring Santilli’s radio show, but it’s just not going to get very far, or as they say in the South, that dog won’t hunt.

    On the other hand if anyone can prove that Santilli was an FBI agent, Pete should get an Academy Award for his performance.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*