The Prepper Journal – by Pat Henry
The news this week of the terrorist attacks in Paris that killed 12 people left me with a few different emotions and thoughts. On one hand I felt a sense of loss for the families and victims who appear to have been murdered over what was essentially a joke. On the other, I was silently thankful this attack was far away from anyone I know or care about personally and that absent my shared grief for other innocent humans, I had not been affected in any real sense.
The current working rationale given for this tragedy appears to be terrorism, but in my mind it wouldn’t matter if this was a bizarre love triangle that went south or a mentally defective Kim Kardashian fan who was upset over a social media post denigrating the object of his obsession. The facts are that someone took lives and to get caught up on the reasoning is a waste of time. There is evil in this world and evil will do evil things when it can.
Whatever the reason; anytime there is a shooting of innocent people, as long as that shooting is not gang or crime related, (or in Chicago apparently) it makes news. Because this is an apparent terrorist attack, it deserves a different kind of attention but at the same time will undoubtedly be used by some as another opportunity to say that guns are bad and should be taken away from law-abiding citizens. Mass shooting events, more so than any other statistics seems to drive this conversation and I suppose the total loss of life at one time is viewed as more tragic and who could really argue with that?
The arguments for and against guns are legion especially in our country and I don’t see them ending anytime soon, but for me at least; getting caught up in statistics is a foolish way to settle this debate. I am not anti-science or anything, but statistics can be and are frequently total crap. It is how one person is viewing, interpreting and massaging the numbers. Mark Twain said it best, “there are three kinds of lies: lies, damn lies and statistics.” You can take statistics that are pro-gun that show that violent crime rates have been dropping and some attribute this to more personal ownership of firearms.
According to the FBI:
In 2013, the estimated number of murders in the nation was 14,196. This was a 4.4 percent decrease from the 2012 estimate, a 7.8 percent decrease from the 2009 figure, and a 12.1 percent drop from the number in 2004
On the flip side you can get statistics from anti-gun people that say violent crime is increasing now for the first time since 2006. Which statistic is right? The one you want to believe is always going to be the right statistic. But to use these particular statistics you have to willfully ignore other statistics like:
Leading Causes of Non-Violent Death
- Heart disease: 596,577
- Cancer: 576,691
- Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 142,943
- Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 128,932
- Accidents (unintentional injuries): 126,438
- Alzheimer’s disease: 84,974
- Diabetes: 73,831
- Influenza and Pneumonia: 53,826
- Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 45,591
- Intentional self-harm (suicide): 39,518
But even looking back at non-health related deaths:
- Unintentional Poisoning: 36,332
- Motor Vehicle: 34,935
- Unintentional Falls: 28,753
Looking at these statistics makes me think that we should really be focusing on so many other things if you are really concerned with saving lives. In my opinion, quoting statistics misses the entire point of the larger gun argument though and for me it doesn’t come down primarily to the Second Amendment although I fully support and believe in that right. No, for me it is a matter of what I believe to be simple common sense. If a bad guy has a gun and is trying to shoot me, I want to have the opportunity to defend myself with the same ability. I don’t care if crime is going down or going up. I still reserve the right to defend my life and yes by the way, the Constitution was written to affirm that right.
Guns only belong in the hands of trained soldiers or law enforcement
But you can’t argue with the idea that guns only belong in the hands of highly qualified and trained individuals like police and soldiers can you? A normal civilian has no need to own firearms and keep them in their home. Why, they could go crazy and kill someone!
People do go crazy all the time and others don’t go crazy at all but commit atrocities just the same. Why are police and soldiers perceived as more entitled to defending their own lives or the lives of others? What about ex-police or veterans? Are they OK to carry firearms since they have had the training? What about civilians that have had extensive firearms training?
Just because you have a job that requires you to carry a firearm that does not make you any more special or more qualified than anyone else. Police officers have committed crimes and yes, even shot people illegally. Veterans and even active duty soldiers have done the same in some instances, but so have Judges, Doctors, and Professors. Your job doesn’t guarantee you are a better or more stable person.
If we take guns away from everyone, the world will be a safer place
The thing about this argument that kills me is that criminals have always gotten their hands on guns but we assume that simply having a gun legally will make you engage in criminal behavior. Why do people believe that if we make everyone simply turn their guns in that the criminals will listen and obey? We already have laws on the books that criminals break every single day and yet you expect that because we make another law, they will finally listen?
The only people who would turn their guns in are the people who actually obey the law. These are the very people who need protection from the ones who do not obey the law.
I hope you shoot yourself with your gun!
I actually had someone say this to me in the comments and for the life of me I can’t understand it. If you don’t believe in gun violence, why are you wishing for my death? I have never heard a pro-gun person say to anyone that wants to take guns away, “I hope you die”! Of course that is possible I guess, but completely irrational.
I don’t want anyone to die. I only want the same ability to defend my life as anyone else has. I don’t want any more limits or rules on what I can do unless I break the law. If I break the law, then I should be tried and if found guilty, face the consequences. It’s called Due Process. If I haven’t broken any laws, why are you restricting my rights but more importantly, why are you hoping a perfectly law abiding citizen dies?
You can’t make evil people stop being evil
Finally, I guess my overarching point is that there will always be evil in the world. There will be people who believe they are righteously killing in the name of their religion. There will be people who are crazy, there will be gangs, there will be drug addicts, and there will be rapists and pedophiles, serial killers and burglars. Let’s deal with all of them first and maybe we can talk about guns then. If you can’t get rid of evil, I don’t want you getting rid of my right to defend myself from it.
http://www.theprepperjournal.com/2015/01/09/will-paris-attacks-renew-call-ban-guns/
Sadly, were this event even true, a few people WITH guns could have made all the difference….
HOWEVER……….
I believe that the need to disarm citizens is ALSO predicated on their fear that if someone interfered in their little dramas, the fraud could quickly become far more evident to even the dullest of people, but the simplest logic eludes most gun-control advocates; CRIMINALS WILL ALWAYS HAVE GUNS.
.
“The arguments for and against guns are legion…..”
Stop it. There’s no real debate. There are responsible, rational, and sensible reasons why the population needs to remain armed, and on the other side there are a bunch of brainwashed disciples of the Church of the New York Times insisting that we all embrace the goodness of Obama.
I’m not even discussing it anymore. I hope there is another call to ban guns, and an actual attempt to confiscate them. It’s exactly what we need.
“But you can’t argue with the idea that guns only belong in the hands of highly qualified and trained individuals like police and soldiers can you? A normal civilian has no need to own firearms and keep them in their home.”
Pfffft JR is right. There is no argument. Those two sentences are enough reason alone.
Some people are stuck on the concept of protecting ourselves from each other or some other outside invading force and it always seems to exclude the one aggressor that has been just as lethal to its victim as any of the others. That would be the government that you allow to wield too much power.
” The facts are that someone took lives and to get caught up on the reasoning is a waste of time.”
So those are the FACTS, are they, genius? And you know this exactly HOW? Because the lying, Zionist MSM TOLD you so?
I no more believe people were killed there than they were at Sandy Hoax. Unless I see some CONCRETE evidence (seriously doubt there is any), I’m not fallin’ for the banana in the tailpipe.