Published on Aug 13, 2013 by SiBorg Jonnie
It’s just sickening that even with this video evidence, everyday people still believe the government story.
From the Trenches World Report
Enforce our Bill of Rights
Published on Aug 13, 2013 by SiBorg Jonnie
It’s just sickening that even with this video evidence, everyday people still believe the government story.
Wow! That’s news to me! Never saw this footage before. Funny how Communist News Network never showed it again after this. Great find, Cath! I’ll save this one.
Yes Cathleen good find excellent post. “) excelant post.
YEA;
I would Excelent post..
Cathlene :lo:
Bodies…where were the bodies (a common fault in contemporary hoaxes) – just like Sandy Hoax.
Forget the Pentagon. Here’s why:
1. There are no photos available that prove anything conclusively.
2. There are no credible witnesses whose accounts aren’t disputed by others.
3. An airplane is little more than a hollow aluminum tube, and can be expected to be shredded into untraceable debris upon 600 mph impact with a reinforced concrete structure. (you shouldn’t expect very much of the fuselage to remain visible in that particular crash, and in fact, there WAS some airplane wreckage inside the building)
4. There is plenty of video footage that was confiscated by the FBI, and hasn’t been shown since. They may be waiting for the right moment to release it. That moment will be when it can be used to discredit everyone who doubts the official story.
Since nothing can be proven conclusively about what happened there, endless discussion of the “Pentagon evidence” is the favorite topic of the truth movement’s subversive spies because it forever dooms the truth of 9-11 to the realm of “conspiracy theories”. This leaves a “truth movement” unable to prove anything, which convinces others that we don’t really have any proof, because if we did, that’s what we’d be showing them.
Now let’s move north, to NYC, where you have the controlled demolition of three skyscrapers, and mountains of irrefutable evidence and scientific data that proves what happened there, complete with all the supporting photos you can ask for, seismic data, infrared satellite photos, and even a confession from Larry Silverstein himself. Slam dunk.
And THAT’s why the spies are always insisting that everyone analyze “the Pentagon evidence.” There is none. Only endless conspiracy theories at the Pentagon. At the World Trade Center you have irrefutable proof that you can bring to anyone, and use to win any argument.
With all due respect, Jolly Roger, just my take on this:
“3. An airplane is little more than a hollow aluminum tube, and can be expected to be shredded into untraceable debris upon 600 mph impact with a reinforced concrete structure. (you shouldn’t expect very much of the fuselage to remain visible in that particular crash, and in fact, there WAS some airplane wreckage inside the building)”
600mph speed was/is impossible at that elevation. The air is too “thick”. Also it was supposedly banking, coming out of a sharp turn, again impossible at 600mph.
Slower speed would show large parts of the plane and engines, and would not turn into “untraceable debris”
Also the size of the hole vs the size of the “plane” doesn’t “fly” if you will.
The airplane parts “found/shown” were parts from another type of plane (smaller aircraft) then the one cited as having crashed.
I am a Civil Engineering Technician by formation and during my 40 year career I have worked on many major bridge and via-duct contracts. Reinforced concrete was my speciality. The h-beams we normally use as foundation piling are basicaly the same type & size as used in the pentacon, and twin towers. I have driven many “miles” of h-beam piles, so I am quite familiar with steel also.
Aluminum vs concrete and steel, Aluminum always loses. And does not desintigrate (Hollywood being an exception). For me, from experience, an aluminum tube does not “slice” through reinforced concrete and steel, I know that for a fact. It does not desintigrate, it will tear and crumble, yes, but parts would still be fairly recognizable, certainly the engines.
That being said, please do not think that I am picking a fight. I’m not. I’m just adding to the discussion and giving my take on the event based on my experience and some common sense.
I wholeheartily agree with you that the time of splitting hairs is long past. I think we know enough of the events to recognize that the official story line is a lie and fabrication. That should be enough to move people to action, and by now, to have done something about it. But like the JFK assassinaiton, a whole cottage industry of book writting, conference giving etc…has grown around it and we are here over 50 years later still discussing and dissecting the “magic bullet”, the Zapruder film and the “grassy knoll” while those responsible still go free (if alive). The same goes for 911, a lot of people are making money by keeping the debate alive, and in the end they know, by keeping people discussing and analysing, that is all that will happen. During that time they remain scott-free. It’s all planned that way. I must add that they have it all well planned out, but one thing is certain,they could not change the laws of physics. The time for action is long past, but sadly, I don’t think we’ll see action any time soon.
Aluminum vs. steel & concrete.
No contest.
only disagree with one thing you said..
“the time for action is long past”
no sir it is never too late
Meant it in the sense of “long overdue” Sorry
I recorded this live on VHS, for days.