Cops Claim Video of them Killing Unarmed Man Can’t Be Used as Evidence, Seize Witness’s Phone

Free Thought Project – by Cassandra Rules

Pasco, WA– Police in Pasco, Washington, on Wednesday, made a ridiculous claim. They stated that a citizen’s video that showed them killing unarmed Antonio Zambrano-Montes, 35, as he ran away, could not be used as evidence.

The video, which was published to YouTube on February 11, captured the shooting very clearly and had been viewed over 1,600,000 times as of Thursday February 19.  

Zambrano-Montes’ shooting marks the fourth killing by Pasco police in less than a year.

The department alleged that they did not know who filmed the video, nor did they have the original file, so it could not be used.  A bizarre claim, since his name has been online the entire week.

On Thursday, the police went to the home of the man who filmed the shooting, Dario Infante Zuniga, 21, and seized his phone without a warrant. Zuniga told The Free Thought Project that the police had made no contact with him prior to invading his privacy.

Dario Infante Zuniga

When the police showed up at his door, they alleged it was because he had not been answering his phone.  They then gave him the choice of either handing his phone over to them or going with them to the station while they retrieved the file.  The police did not give Zuniga the opportunity to clean out his personal files before they took it into their possession.  The officers reportedly told him the only thing that they would look for would be the video, but Zuniga still feels as though his privacy was violated.

“They didn’t have a warrant, and I was going to consult a lawyer tomorrow on what I should do. I spoke with a lawyer today and he told me that the police need the video for evidence, but that I wasn’t required to give a statement,” Zuniga told the Free Thought Project when we asked if he had intended to turn the video over to them before they paid him a surprise visit.

The police attempted to get him to give a statement, but he declined and is wisely waiting until he has a lawyer present.

Zuniga witnessed nearly the entire encounter, he says.  When he arrived, there was only one officer at the scene.

“I don’t think the officers did the right thing. I think they over used their power. There was a few different ways that they could have handled the situation.” Zuniga said, citing a taser gun as one feasible option seeing as the man was unarmed.

Not only did the police wait over a week to contact him, but they also failed to question witnesses at the scene- ushering everyone away as soon as more officers arrived.

Zuniga films every interaction or police encounter he witnesses and urges everyone else to do the same.

“Everyone needs to start filming police so that when things like this happen police don’t try to change things up,” he said.

Had Zuniga not been there, it is very likely that we would never know what exactly took place, having only the department’s statement.

This investigation is already questionable, as police have seemingly launched a full investigation into their victim. This “investigation” is likely an attempt to character assassinate him, instead of investigating why officers decided to shoot a man who was fleeing with his hands up.

Ken Lattin, a spokesperson for the Kennewick Police Department, has stated that he is trying to piece together what Zambrano-Montes was doing “hours, days, and weeks leading up to this incident.”

“It’s curious that when you ask them about the past of some of the officers, they say that information is not pertinent to the investigation,” Felix Vargas, chair of Consejo Latino, a local organization of Hispanic-owned businesses, said after a briefing, Fusion reports. “But somehow what Zambrano was doing weeks before this incident is vital information.”

This video may be a large part of the reason that this case has received much more attention than many of the at least 146 others who have been killed by police this year.  Filming police is one of the best ways that we can police the police, and it is imperative that each one of us film every encounter, every time.

It seems as though the only ones being treated like criminals here are the victim and a witness.

The three officers involved in the fatal shooting were all equipped with microphones that were reportedly on, and there is also dashcam footage of the incident. None of this footage has been released to the public yet.

“My video did shake things up, and I’m glad it did. I just really hope my video helps.  I hope it brings justice and hopefully starts to change things so police stop over using their power just because they have a badge.” Zuniga stated.

We hope so too.  Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and this video has certainly shined some serious light on this situation in Pasco.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/police-claim-video-pasco-police-killing-evidence-seize-witnesses-phone/#H3k5dhSIfcOESoT7.99

9 thoughts on “Cops Claim Video of them Killing Unarmed Man Can’t Be Used as Evidence, Seize Witness’s Phone

  1. Doesn’t need to be used as evidence , we already know what they all are
    Judgment day will come and they will all fear it ( by their actions they already fear us , maybe it’s time WE ramp up our fear propaganda and let them know it will be swift and just)
    The retribution for their acts will be more brutal than they will ever have a clue of
    When the party starts the cowards will shed their costumes and run home To mommy
    Because they are the cowards they have repetitively proven to be

  2. Shouldn’t have answered the door
    Or at least said I don’t talk to police
    And lied to them as they do to us and said it wasn’t recorded on his phone and handed them a blank video camera from the 80’s
    Anything to get them away from you until you talk to a mouth piece

    Maybe we need to start posting video anonymously or by code or many different ways to protect ones identity
    Encrypt the video
    Well what’s been seen , cannot be unseen
    Anyone who isn’t awake to the police state isn’t paying attention

    1. If the country is running like it is supposed to, the jurors decide what is evidence. First the jurors of the grand jury and then the trial jury. The root of the word evidence is evident. I think I’d rather have 12 people deciding what is evident than one, as in the judge, because then all they have to do is corrupt one.

  3. Had it been a scumbag pig that was shot & killed, you could bet the farm that that video would be ROCK SOLID EVIDENCE against ANY perpetrator.

    Pigs are special, don’cha know.

  4. In IL. it is already the law. You can film the police but said film can not be used as evidence in court against them. That is the law there. Tell you all you need to know about what the police in that State are!

  5. The court room proceedings are going to be a joke regardless of the evidence.

    The evidence has been shown, and the verdict is already in. They’ll get theirs.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*