Failure to find a sexual partner is now a DISABILITY says World Health Organisation

Express – by Rebecca Perring

Until now, infertility – the failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sex – was considered a disability.

But now in dramatic move the World Health Organisation will change the standard to suggest that a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children – will now be equally classified as disabled.   

WHO says the change will give every individual “the right to reproduce”.

Under the new rules, heterosexual single men and women and gay men and women who want to have children will now be given the same priority as a couple seeking IVF because of medical fertility problems.

But critics branded the new laws as “absurd nonsense” arguing that the organisation has overstepped the mark by moving into social matters rather than health.

Gareth Johnson MP, former chair of the All Parliamentary Group on Infertility, whose own children were born thanks to fertility treatment, said: “I’m in general a supporter of IVF. But I’ve never regarded infertility as a disability or a disease but rather a medical matter.

“I’m the first to say you should have more availability of IVF to infertile couples but we need to ensure this whole subject retains credibility.

“This definition runs the risk of undermining the work Nice and others have done to ensure IVF treatment is made available for infertile couples when you get definitions off the mark like this. I think it’s trying to put IVF into a box that it doesn’t fit into frankly.”

Josephine Quintavalle,from Comment on Reproductive Ethics added: “This absurd nonsense is not simply re-defining infertility but completely side-lining the biological process and significance of natural intercourse between a man and a woman.

“How long before babies are created and grown on request completely in the lab?”

But Dr David Adamson, an author of the new standards, argued it is a “big chance” for single and gay people.

He said: “The definition of infertility is now written in such a way that it includes the rights of all individuals to have a family, and that includes single men, single women, gay men, gay women.

“It puts a stake in the ground and says an individual’s got a right to reproduce whether or not they have a partner. It’s a big change.

“It fundamentally alters who should be included in this group and who should have access to healthcare. It sets an international legal standard. Countries are bound by it.”

A spokesman for the Department of Health said the NHS was under no obligation to follow WHO’s final advice.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/723323/Sexual-partner-fertility-disability-World-Health-Organisation-IVF

9 thoughts on “Failure to find a sexual partner is now a DISABILITY says World Health Organisation

  1. One wonders if this is not a blinded, one-sided view, that speaks of only those, who can afford children, having such a right, by legal definition…

    .It may include each individual, but its only based on class. Thus ignoring, that the world can no longer cope with the population, we now have….and so allows without much ado, the starvation-death of millions yearly….
    As much as the now-dead leader of Libya was denigrated, he at least had a vision of creating a African development bank, to spur the same domestic growth for each nation-state in Africa, as the West had taken through forced colonialism —
    -Still, the West and NATO, speak to the rights of all, but only to placate, never to actually enforce such rights. Leaving those in Africa to continue to be treated as lesser-than. The same determination is now being forced on most of the Middle East.through war….Hypocrisy rules….as do corporations using trade agreements to stifle real economic growth by any domestic small to medium-sized businesses…see bilaterals.org.

  2. “Under the new rules, heterosexual single men and women and gay men and women who want to have children will now be given the same priority as a couple seeking IVF because of medical fertility problems.”

    AND GAY MEN AND WOMEN???

    Let me clue you in on something… medical fertility has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT A WOMAN CANNOT IMPREGNATE ANOTHER WOMAN, AND NEITHER CAN A MAN DO LIKEWISE TO ANOTHER MAN!!!

    Insanity abounds! 😡

  3. “a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children – will now be equally classified as disabled.”

    Where do I sign up? Do I get benefits?

  4. “Failure to find a sexual partner is now a DISABILITY says World Health Organisation”…….
    AS WIFIE WOULD SAY, “THIS BEGS THE QUESTION; EVEN THE ONES WITH BATTERIES??????”

  5. “How long before babies are created and grown on request completely in the lab?”

    I believe that’s the point. Engineering abominations that are the perfect frankenstein coollies for deviant special-interest snowflakes and queers gives tptb the perfect base for a completely controlled humanoid populace.

    Those that sign onto such a procedure in the first place would NEVER question anything that their religion called “science” would or could propose.

    That would be heresy to them. After all, they have been “educated” the most on the unquestionable so-called compilation of facts that their government controlled universities and msm have created for them.

  6. I smell a “Children of Men” scenario afoot, or at least a pre-trial “Brave New World” one…who said movies are the only vehicle for predictive programming? And don’t tell me Aldous Huxley had no clue about this!

    And doesn’t the Bible–Genesis Six to be exact–say something about this as well?

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*