Activist Post – by Brandon Turbeville
In keeping with the tradition of the FBI’s position on gun rights, it appears the Bureau is working overdrive to monitor and harass gun owners and the gun shops that sell to them.
While government surveillance of gun purchases and gun owners is nothing new, a recent visit by an FBI Counterterrorism agent to a Columbia, South Carolina gun shop has only reinforced the knowledge that the U.S. government is growing more and more concerned by the prospect of a well-armed populace – particularly one that prefers to live without constant government interference in their personal lives.
While the narrative surrounding “counterterrorism” operations used to eviscerate civil liberties after 9/11was initially based upon the threat of Muslim fundamentalists, that narrative has clearly shifted to a focus on gun owning, law-abiding American citizens – both those who are politically active and those who are blissfully ignorant of current events.
For many, this shift of focus has been quite the surprise. Thus, when the Columbia, South Carolina gun shop in question was approached by an FBI counterterrorism agent on Monday, April 14, the individuals who spoke with him were somewhat alarmed to realize that the agent’s concern was not fundamentalist Muslims but Americans who promote small government.
According to an individual who was present during the visit (this person will remain anonymous for obvious reasons), the agent pulled up in a regular vehicle in plain clothes and took a look around the shop as if he were considering a purchase before approaching the staff and announcing that he was with the FBI Counterterrorism unit.
“Never in a million years would I have thought this guy was a fed,” said the witness. “He was in a completely normal vehicle. Regular clothes. Everything. I would have thought this guy was just some downhome country boy.”
After showing proper identification, the agent told the shop owners that he was tasked with all the gun shops in the general area and that he was charged with investigating “suspicious purchases” in accordance with counterterrorism operations.
The suspicious purchases he mentioned, however, were completely normal transactions. This included, paying with cash, purchasing long guns, and other similarly innocuous behavior.
However, what surprised the owners the most was his statement regarding what he was most interested in tracking.
According to the witness, the agent stated, “If you see some Middle Eastern guy come in. You don’t have to be so worried about that. What we’re really looking for are people talking about being sovereign such as sovereign citizens or people talking about Big Government.”
The agent also mentioned that he had a spreadsheet of all the gun shops in the area.
After this brief chat, the agent left a flyer with the shop that listed some of the more generic and normal behaviors which they were expected to view as suspicious.
Some of these trigger behaviors are:
- Payment in cash or someone else’s credit card.
- Reluctant or unwilling to produce valid I.D.
- Large purchases or unusual inquiries into buying in bulk
- Lack of knowledge involved in firearms or product usage
- Hints at illegal or misuse of explosives
- New or unknown customers
- Nervousness or evasiveness
In the end, while the visit to a local gun shop by an FBI Counterterrorism agent is no surprise, it should serve as a stark reminder that the U.S. government is vastly concerned about a well-armed populace. Gun rights have been gradually eroded in the United States for decades but the assault on gun rights has been ratcheted up to a new level by the Obama administration.
Still, those expecting a public declaration of total gun illegality and martial law confiscation will be wringing their hands in anticipation for a very long time. Of course, while they wring their hands and anticipate the declaration of outright war against gun owners, their guns are being slowly stripped from their hands in an incremental fashion. Slight rule changes and isolated confiscations will continue to take place over time until the public has been properly acclimated to them as a fact of life, at which point the public’s line in the sand will be moved slightly forward once more. Again, the line will be crossed, but only slightly. Eventually, Americans will wake up to find themselves completely disarmed and neutered in a land in which they once believed they were free. At that point, with a completely defenseless population, the thin veneer of freedom will be lifted.
It is time for gun owners and gun rights activists to go on the political offensive. In 2014, it is no longer a legitimate mode of activism to be content to defend your already attenuated freedoms. It is time to make demands. It is time to throw compromise out the window.
http://www.activistpost.com/2014/04/fbi-visiting-gun-shops-to-investigate.html
Want to talk about “PARANOIA”?
They are afraid. Nice to see those lying, thieving, murdering stinking rats get a taste of what they’ve been dishing out to the American people since they were brought into this country.
You turn on the TV in the evening its always on every channel some Fed Enforcer agency show, or COP show. Intimidation and propaganda is their biggest weapon against us all. We all step onto the field they’re proverbial goose is cooked and they know it. BIG TIME!!!!
I don’t believe a word of this, and nor do I trust anything that comes from the Zionist-protecting “Activist Post”.
The almost-identical story was released shortly after 9-11, but in that version the FBI was paying visits and questioning people who were discussing the possibility of government involvement in 9-11. (that never happened either)
The ONLY reason this story was written is to scare people out of discussing sovereignty. This story didn’t happen, and there are no “anonymous sources” other than those that exist in the lying author’s head. Brandon Turbeville is a lying shill who invented this story (or it was handed to him) in an attempt to silence dissent.
“According to an individual who was present during the visit (this person will remain anonymous for obvious reasons)…”
No. The reasons aren’t obvious, and in fact, they don’t even make sense. Why would he be worried about his identity being revealed if all he did was be present when the FBI showed up?