Brunei could start whipping or stoning gay people to death next week when strict new laws are introduced, human rights groups have warned.
The tiny oil-rich nation already implements Sharia laws, with homosexuality punishable with up to ten years in prison.
But from the start of next month the government plans to amend the penal code to mean LGBT people and adulterers could be stoned to death, with thieves facing having hands or feet amputated.
Amnesty International today slammed the plans, describing the Islamic criminal laws for gay sex and theft as ‘vicious’.
Brunei was the first East Asian country to introduce Islamic criminal law in 2014 when it announced the first of three stages of legal changes that included fines or jail for offences like pregnancy outside marriage or failing to pray on Friday.
Previously, homosexuality was illegal in Brunei and punishable by up to ten years imprisonment. But the changes would allow whipping and stoning to death for Muslims found guilty of adultery, sodomy and rape, said human rights groups.
The new penalty for theft is amputation of the right hand for a first offence, and the left foot for a second offence.
The new penalties, which also apply to children, are in new sections under Brunei’s Sharia Penal Code and will come into effect April 3, Amnesty said in a statement.
The country delayed implementing the final two stages of changes after an international backlash in 2014 which included a boycott of the Beverley Hills Hotel, which is linked to Brunei’s government.
But now Brunei authorities plan to go ahead with both stages, said Matthew Woolfe, founder of human rights group The Brunei Project.
Brunei’s sultan instituted the Sharia Penal Code in 2014 to bolster the influence of Islam in the tiny, oil-rich monarchy, which has long been known for conservative policies such as banning the public sale of liquor.
The Sultan is no stranger to controversy at home – the monarchy was deeply embarrassed by a family feud with his brother Jefri over the latter’s alleged embezzlement of $15 billion during his tenure as finance minister in the 1990s.
Court battles and investigations revealed salacious details of Jefri’s un-Islamic jetset lifestyle, including claims of a high-priced harem of foreign women and a luxury yacht he owned called ‘Tits’.
Brunei first announced the measures in 2013 but implementation has been delayed as officials worked out the practical details and in the teeth of opposition by rights groups.
Amnesty labelled the penal code as a ‘deeply flawed piece of legislation’ with a range of provisions that violate human rights.
The legal changes were announced in a discreet notice on the attorney general’s website, the human rights group said.
Rachel Chhoa-Howard, Brunei researcher at Amnesty International, said some of the potential offences ‘should not even be deemed crimes at all, including consensual sex between adults of the same gender’.
She added: ‘To legalise such cruel and inhuman penalties is appalling of itself.
‘Brunei must immediately halt its plans to implement these vicious punishments and revise its penal code in compliance with its human rights obligations.
‘The international community must urgently condemn Brunei’s move to put these cruel penalties into practice.’
There has been no vocal opposition to the law in Brunei, where Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah rules as head of state with full executive authority. Public criticism of his policies is extremely rare in Brunei.
The Sultan, who has reigned since 1967, has previously said the Shariah Penal Code should be regarded as a form of ‘special guidance’ from God and would be ‘part of the great history’ of Brunei.
Under secular laws, Brunei already prescribes caning as a penalty for crimes including immigration offences, for which convicts can be flogged with a rattan cane.
Phil Robertson of Human Rights Watch said Brunei will become the only country in Southeast Asia to punish gay sex with death if it pushes through with the law.
He warned that implementation of the law ‘will quickly drive the country towards human rights pariah status in the eyes of foreign investors, tourists, and international agencies’.
Under a shift towards hardline Islamic law, Brunei in 2015 banned excessive Christmas celebrations for fear that Muslims could be led astray.
ASEAN SOGIE Caucus, a Manila-based human rights group, confirmed the implementation of the remaining changes were due to take place on April 3, citing government documents.
Manila-based OutRight Action International also confirmed Brunei was about to implement a new stage in its sharia laws.
The Brunei Prime Minister’s Department did not respond to a request for comment.
‘We are trying to get pressure placed on the government of Brunei but realise there is a very short time frame until the laws take affect,’ Woolfe said, calling on governments to step up diplomatic pressure on Brunei.
‘It took us by surprise that the government has now given a date and is rushing through implementation,’ said the Australia-based campaigner.
Woolfe said there had been no major public announcements on the implementation of the penal code changes aside from a statement on attorney general’s website late December which only came to light this week.
Socially conservative attitudes prevail across Asia with Myanmar, Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei banning sexual relationships between men while Indonesia has seen an increase in raids targeting LGBT+ people in recent years.
Brunei, a former British protectorate of about 400,000 nestled between two Malaysian states on Borneo island, is the first country in east Asia to adopt the criminal component of sharia at a national level.
‘The full implementation of sharia penal law will apply severe penalties against consensual same-sex relations, including death penalty via stoning,’ Ryan Silverio, a coordinator at ASEAN SOGIE Caucus.
Dede Oetomo, one of Indonesia’s most prominent LGBT+ activists, said it would be a gross violation of international human rights if the changes went ahead.
‘It is horrible. Brunei is imitating the most conservative Arab states,’ he said.
QUICK!!!!
SEND US TROOPS TO BOMB THEIR ASSES!!!!
“THE POLES” SHOW THAT 98% OF AMERICANS THINK HOMOSEXUALITY IS GREAT!!!
AND THAT STONING FAGS IS BADDDDDDDDDDDD….
IT AINT ABOUT OIL!!!
ITS ABOUT SEX!!!!!
LMAO!!!!!!!!!
A bit more here:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/28/brunei-brings-in-death-by-stoning-as-punishment-for-gay-sex
.
Stoning to death as a punishment for adultery is NO WHERE
spoken of in the Holy Quran.
At one instance stoning was done
to a Jew- that was based on the Jewish Holy Book. The Jews
referred a case on fornication to the Messenger of God (pbuh).
He asked them what punishment the Torah prescribed in case
of adultery. The Jews tried first to conceal the fact that it was
stoning to death, but the Jewish scholar living then ( Abd-Allah
ibn Salam) admitted the existence of such a punishment and the
guilty persons were dealt with as given in Torah ( Bukhari
61;25)
The New Testament narrates a similar incident during the time
of Jesus(pbuh) I quote from John Chapter 8 Verses 3,4 and 5.
Verse 3. Then the scribes and Pharisees brought to him (Jesus-
pbuh) a woman caught in adultery. And when they set her in
the midst.
Verse 4. They said to him, “Teacher, this woman was caught in
adultery, in the VERY ACT.
Verse 5. “Now Moses, in the law commanded us that such
SHOULD BE STONED. But what do you say?” JOHN 8: 3-5
So you can see that stoning was the punishment for adultery in
the Jewish Law and that in the case of Jewish offenders, this
punishment was resorted to by the Holy Prophet( pbuh) when
he was the ruler of Medinah.
Was the same punishment given to Muslims in Medinah at any
time? Yes.
It is true that the same punishment was given in certain cases
when the offenders were Muslims. BUT CERTAINLY THIS
WAS BEFORE THE REVELATION OF THE QURANIC
VERSE 24:2 which says:
“ As for the adulteress and the adulterer-flog each of them with
a hundred stripes, and let not compassion with them keep you
from this law of God, if you believe in God and the Last Day;
and let a group of the believers witness their chastisement”
24:2
Verse 24:2 speaks of MILD flogging, aiming at disgracing the
offenders rather than torturing. The number of those to witness
has been deliberately left unspecified, thus indicating that while
the mild punishment must be given publicly, it need not be made
a ‘public spectacle’.
The Arabic word for flogging is JALD( means: skin). In other
words, the punishment by flogging should be felt only by the
skin. It aims more at disgracing the culprits rather than
torturing them.
Hence the Holy Quran positively excludes death
or stoning to death. In fact, anyone who does deep research
and objective interpretation of the Quranic Verse 4: 25, can see
that, all possibilities of death as a punishment for adultery are
precluded.
Verse 4.25 gives the law on punishing for immoral conduct
(fornication) of believing maidens ( the community rightfully possess) They
shall be liable to HALF the penalty to which free married
women are liable.
The weaker social status of a slave woman makes her, obviously
more accessible to sexual temptation than a free married
woman is presumed to be.
Now the important point here is to understand that the number
of 100 flogging can be halved but death or stoning to death can
never be halved.
So it is very clear that the Holy Quran speaks about flogging not
death as a punishment for adultery.
Now the question arises: Why did the prophet(pbuh) punish
the Muslim adulterers making use of the Laws of Moses?
The answer is, it was the Prophet’s practice to follow the earlier
revealed law until he received an amended and a definite law on
a specific wrong doing.
It’s these policies I detest, and it matters not to me where they spring from, be it scripture or forgery, or even any particular deity. Whatever the excuse, this makes The State the judge and punisher, exercising its supremacy using shame and pain. Like The Dark Ages advancing. The Common Law restored, can’t come soon enough.
.