Washington D.C. –-(Ammoland.com)- Congress is attempting to pass “red flag” gun confiscation orders and other gun control measures in the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act (VAWA).
For years the gun measures have held up negotiations on the bill in the Senate, but it seems like Republicans are ready to cave in pass the bill with the gun control measures intact. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), and Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) said that they see “a path forward” on the bill with the anti-gun provisions in place.
The bill has been one of the centerpieces of President Joe Biden’s anti-gun plan. On the day that Biden announced the David Chipman nomination for Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Director, the president pushed Congress to pass the bill. He framed it as a way to protect women from abusers.
“I held over a thousand hours of hearings to pass the Violence Against Women Act… this has been a hobbyhorse of mine for a long time — got it done once,” Biden told the media during the Chipman announcement.
The bill would establish federal grants to fund firearm seizures from Americans. These grants would be given to states to support the stripping of firearms from the State’s citizens. The bill would also create another category of “red flag” laws that would expand gun confiscations to people convicted of just a misdemeanor.
The bill would also increase funding to prosecute National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) denials. The vast majority of denials are false positives. Roughly 95% of denials are false positives. The funding would burden tens of thousands of law-abiding American gun owners that the system falsely flagged as prohibited.
One of the most concerning parts of the bill is that it provides special appointments and deputations to carry out the gun control measures listed in the proposed law. Many gun-rights advocates see these special appointments as a way of building a new anti-gun force that will violate the firearms rights of Americans. They point out that nothing in the bill makes women safer.
There has been some push back on the bill by Senators Josh Hawley or (R-MO), Tom Cotton (R-AR), and John Cornyn (R-TX). None of the pushback from the Senators centers around the built-in gun control measures. The lack of pushback against the anti-gun efforts concerns many gun rights activists who hoped Republicans would reject the gun control in the bill.
During the hearings in the Senate, Democrats were confident that the bill would be passed with the anti-gun measures intact. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) was all smiles at the end of the hearing on VAWA. He believes that the bill will pass with a filibuster-proof majority. With no filibuster in the House of Representatives, the bill cannot be stopped in that chamber of Congress.
“I look forward to introducing the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act [Senate Compromise Bill] with Senators Ernst, and Feinstein, [and] many of our colleagues, quickly,” Durbin said at the end of the hearing. “We want to move on this. We need to get this bill to a president who is ANXIOUS to receive it as well and sign it into authorization.”
Concerned gun owners have time to encourage their Senators to vote against the VAWA, but time is limited. Right now, it looks like the VAWA has the votes to pass in the Senate with the gun control measures intact.
Nearly 2,000 Women Murdered by Men in One Year, New Violence Policy Center Study Finds
Washington, DC — Nearly 2,000 women were murdered by men in 2018 and the most common weapon used was a gun, according to the most recent edition of the annual Violence Policy Center (VPC) study When Men Murder Women: An Analysis of 2018 Homicide Data.
https://vpc.org/press/nearly-2000-women-murdered-by-men-in-one-year-new-violence-policy-center-study-finds/
Okay – let’s assume that all 2000 were killed by a man using a gun.
Take half the population (so, women) of the USA and multiply it by the number below, and you get your 2,000.
0.0000122699386503%
A woman has a greater chance of dying from a shark attack in Knoxville than she does from being shot by some arsehole dude.
You are probably correct and I’m sorry to say it is just another bullshit irrelevant argument.
The 2nd Article of the absolute unalienable ratified law of December 15, 1791 states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
There is no other argument. That is the law and it ends at that f-king period. Every other argument is completely irrelevant and a distraction. If they go past that period, it is our duty under the natural law to shoot or hang them. Period.
If you want a full scale war, then pass the bill, dickheads! The first place we’ll go will be to each of the Congress members houses and show them what come and take it really means!
I’m sick of this sh$t. The whole lot of them including Joey need to hang for high treason!
And wouldn’t it be interesting if, say, a hundred people fed up with Con-gress crapola against the BoR hired one bodyguard for every ten folks showing up to “send them a message” so to speak….only to have one of those bodyguards “take care of” the Con-gress crap they’re supposed to guard?
Hanging may have to happen, but I’d rather send them to Antarctica, and, when they die of freezing or starvation or after eating each other, they’ll wind up roasting in the sulphur-and-brimstone Lake of Fire…. or the outer darkness, “where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth”….